Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Jul;22(4):353-357. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0719. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
A recent article identified weaknesses in the management of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The authors suggested some reasons but overlooked two of the reasons for the low quality of services: a lack of resources and a systemic failure to organise rehabilitation services. They suggested early involvement of a condition-specific service with a new 'neuroscience clinician' and additional neuro-navigators, but the evidence shows this approach does not work. Their proposal failed to acknowledge the neuroscience skills of existing rehabilitation medicine consultants and teams, and ignored the many non-TBI problems patients will have and the consequent need for expert rehabilitation input. We revise and develop their proposal, suggesting an alternative way to improve services. Rehabilitation teams should work in parallel with acute services and remain responsible for the rehabilitation of patients as they move through different settings. This suggested development of rehabilitation mirrors the development followed by geriatric medicine from 40 years ago.
最近的一篇文章指出了创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者管理中的一些弱点。作者提出了一些原因,但忽略了服务质量低下的两个原因:缺乏资源和系统未能组织康复服务。他们建议早期引入特定于病情的服务,配备新的“神经科学临床医生”和额外的神经导航员,但证据表明这种方法行不通。他们的提议没有承认现有的康复医学顾问和团队的神经科学技能,也忽略了患者可能存在的许多非 TBI 问题,以及因此需要专家康复投入。我们修改并完善了他们的提案,提出了一种改进服务的替代方法。康复团队应该与急性服务并行工作,并在患者在不同环境中移动时负责他们的康复。这种康复模式的发展建议反映了 40 年前老年医学所遵循的发展模式。