• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient Experiences of and Priorities for Traumatic Brain Injury Health Care in a US Level 1 Trauma Center: A Qualitative Study.美国一级创伤中心创伤性脑损伤医疗保健的患者体验与优先事项:一项定性研究
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2025 Jun 13;9(4):100630. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100630. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
"It's a tool, it's got hardships": a qualitative study of patient experience of colonoscopy and implications for trauma-informed care.“这是一种工具,会有艰难之处”:一项关于结肠镜检查患者体验及对创伤知情护理影响的定性研究
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 21;18:17562848251346250. doi: 10.1177/17562848251346250. eCollection 2025.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
7
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
8
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Associated with Uptake of Patient Portals at a Federally Qualified Health Care Center.联邦合格医疗中心患者门户网站使用情况的相关因素。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 30;12(15):1505. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12151505.
2
Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting.主题分析在健康心理学中应用得好吗?对已发表研究的批判性评价,以及对质量实践和报告的建议。
Health Psychol Rev. 2023 Dec;17(4):695-718. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2161594. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
3
Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research.创伤性脑损伤:预防、临床护理和研究方面的进展和挑战。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Nov;21(11):1004-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00309-X. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Management of traumatic brain injury: practical development of a recent proposal.创伤性脑损伤的管理:近期提案的实用开发。
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Jul;22(4):353-357. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0719. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
5
Symptom Frequency and Persistence in the First Year after Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study.创伤性脑损伤后第一年的症状频率和持续时间:TRACK-TBI 研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Mar;39(5-6):358-370. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0348. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
6
Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study.在前瞻性、纵向 TRACK-TBI 研究中,中度至重度创伤性脑损伤后第一年的功能结局。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Aug 1;78(8):982-992. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2043.
7
Unmet Rehabilitation Needs after Traumatic Brain Injury across Europe: Results from the CENTER-TBI Study.欧洲创伤性脑损伤后未满足的康复需求:CENTER-TBI研究结果
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 3;10(5):1035. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051035.
8
Management of traumatic brain injury (TBI): a clinical neuroscience-led pathway for the NHS.创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的管理:NHS的临床神经科学主导路径。
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Mar;21(2):e198-e205. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0336.
9
A Manual for the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Interview.《格拉斯哥结局量表-扩展访谈手册》
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Sep 1;38(17):2435-2446. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7527. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
10
Care transitions in the first 6months following traumatic brain injury: Lessons from the CENTER-TBI study.创伤性脑损伤后 6 个月内的护理交接:来自 CENTER-TBI 研究的经验教训。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Nov;64(6):101458. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.10.009. Epub 2021 Jul 23.

美国一级创伤中心创伤性脑损伤医疗保健的患者体验与优先事项:一项定性研究

Patient Experiences of and Priorities for Traumatic Brain Injury Health Care in a US Level 1 Trauma Center: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Nelson Lindsay D, Gray Samuel, Barry Courtney O, Young Staci A

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology.

Department of Neurosurgery.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2025 Jun 13;9(4):100630. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100630. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100630
PMID:40584562
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12205785/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To learn patient perspectives about health care in a level I trauma center for traumatic brain injury (TBI) that inform the design of better TBI systems of care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a community-engaged qualitative study that enrolled 42 individuals who had been either treated and discharged home from a level I trauma center emergency department (n=21, 50%) or who were admitted to the trauma center inpatient units (n=21, 50%). Interviews, conducted from August 12, 2022, to September 22, 2023, inquired about injury, post-acute and after post-acute care, clinical and community supports received, unexpected experiences, and things that helped or hurt access to care and outcome. Thematic analyses were completed in October 2024.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged. Participants conveyed a desire to be informed and engaged in their health and health care, reporting deficiencies, for example, in health care providers' explanation of their TBI diagnosis, communication about in-hospital care, and discharge instructions. They reported varied difficulties navigating the health care system after discharge, resulting in no or insufficient TBI follow-up care. Third, responses illuminated the importance of social risk and resilience factors, with particularly important roles of financial strain and social support. Fourth, participants conveyed unique feelings of vulnerability and uncertainty about TBI resulting from its variable, uncertain course.

CONCLUSION

The findings align with and expand on findings from quantitative studies of common gaps in TBI care, whereas illuminating distinct targets for ongoing national and international efforts to develop more coordinated, patient-centered systems of care.

摘要

目的

了解一级创伤中心中创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者对医疗保健的看法,以为更好地设计TBI护理系统提供参考。

患者与方法

这是一项社区参与的定性研究,纳入了42名患者,其中21名(50%)在一级创伤中心急诊科接受治疗后出院回家,另外21名(50%)被收治到创伤中心住院部。于2022年8月12日至2023年9月22日进行访谈,询问了损伤情况、急性后期和急性后期护理情况、所获得的临床和社区支持、意外经历,以及有助于或阻碍获得护理和影响治疗结果的因素。2024年10月完成了主题分析。

结果

出现了四个主题。参与者表达了希望了解并参与自身健康及医疗保健的愿望,报告了医疗保健提供者在解释其TBI诊断、沟通住院护理情况及出院指导方面存在的不足。他们报告了出院后在医疗保健系统中遇到的各种困难,导致没有或没有足够的TBI后续护理。第三,回答阐明了社会风险和恢复力因素的重要性,其中经济压力和社会支持的作用尤为重要。第四,参与者表达了由于TBI病程多变、不确定而产生的独特的脆弱感和不确定感。

结论

这些发现与TBI护理常见差距的定量研究结果一致并有所扩展,同时为正在进行的国家和国际努力指明了不同的目标,以开发更协调、以患者为中心的护理系统。