• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际性急性脊髓损伤监测研究证实了跨国临床试验的可行性。

International surveillance study in acute spinal cord injury confirms viability of multinational clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.

SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2022 Jun 14;20(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02395-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12916-022-02395-0
PMID:35705947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9202190/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The epidemiological international landscape of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) has evolved over the last decades along with given inherent differences in acute care and rehabilitation across countries and jurisdictions. However, to what extent these differences may influence neurological and functional recovery as well as the integrity of international trials is unclear. The latter also relates to historical clinical data that are exploited to inform clinical trial design and as potential comparative data.

METHODS

Epidemiological and clinical data of individuals with traumatic and ischemic SCI enrolled in the European Multi-Center Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) were analyzed. Mixed-effect models were employed to account for the longitudinal nature of the data, efficiently handle missing data, and adjust for covariates. The primary outcomes comprised demographics/injury characteristics and standard scores to quantify neurological (i.e., motor and sensory scores examined according to the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury) and functional recovery (walking function). We externally validated our findings leveraging data from a completed North American landmark clinical trial.

RESULTS

A total of 4601 patients with acute SCI were included. Over the course of 20 years, the ratio of male to female patients remained stable at 3:1, while the distribution of age at injury significantly shifted from unimodal (2001/02) to bimodal distribution (2019). The proportional distribution of injury severities and levels remained stable with the largest percentages of motor complete injuries. Both, the rate and pattern of neurological and functional recovery, remained unchanged throughout the surveillance period despite the increasing age at injury. The findings related to recovery profiles were confirmed by an external validation cohort (n=791). Lastly, we built an open-access and online surveillance platform ("Neurosurveillance") to interactively exploit the study results and beyond.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some epidemiological changes and considerable advances in clinical management and rehabilitation, the neurological and functional recovery following SCI has remained stable over the last two decades. Our study, including a newly created open-access and online surveillance tool, constitutes an unparalleled resource to inform clinical practice and implementation of forthcoming clinical trials targeting neural repair and plasticity in acute spinal cord injury.

摘要

背景

过去几十年中,创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)的国际流行病学格局发生了变化,这与各国和司法管辖区在急性护理和康复方面的固有差异有关。然而,这些差异在多大程度上可能影响神经和功能恢复以及国际试验的完整性尚不清楚。后者还涉及到历史临床数据,这些数据被用来为临床试验设计提供信息,并作为潜在的比较数据。

方法

分析了欧洲多中心脊髓损伤研究(EMSCI)中纳入的创伤性和缺血性 SCI 患者的流行病学和临床数据。采用混合效应模型来解释数据的纵向性质,有效地处理缺失数据,并调整协变量。主要结果包括人口统计学/损伤特征和标准评分,以量化神经(即根据国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准检查的运动和感觉评分)和功能恢复(行走功能)。我们利用已完成的北美标志性临床试验的数据对外验证了我们的发现。

结果

共纳入 4601 例急性 SCI 患者。在 20 年的时间里,男女患者的比例保持在 3:1,而受伤时的年龄分布从单峰(2001/02)显著转变为双峰分布(2019)。损伤严重程度和水平的比例分布保持稳定,最大百分比为运动完全损伤。尽管受伤时的年龄增加,但神经和功能恢复的速度和模式在整个监测期间保持不变。在外部验证队列(n=791)中也证实了恢复特征的发现。最后,我们构建了一个开放访问和在线监测平台(“神经监测”),以互动方式利用研究结果和其他信息。

结论

尽管在临床管理和康复方面取得了一些进展,但过去二十年中 SCI 后的神经和功能恢复仍然保持稳定。我们的研究包括一个新创建的开放访问和在线监测工具,是一个无与伦比的资源,可以为临床实践提供信息,并为针对急性脊髓损伤的神经修复和可塑性的即将到来的临床试验提供信息。

相似文献

1
International surveillance study in acute spinal cord injury confirms viability of multinational clinical trials.国际性急性脊髓损伤监测研究证实了跨国临床试验的可行性。
BMC Med. 2022 Jun 14;20(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02395-0.
2
Natural history of neurological improvement following complete (AIS A) thoracic spinal cord injury across three registries to guide acute clinical trial design and interpretation.三种登记处对完全性(AIS A)胸段脊髓损伤后神经功能改善的自然史研究,以指导急性临床试验的设计和解读。
Spinal Cord. 2019 Sep;57(9):753-762. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0299-8. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
3
Prediction of segmental motor outcomes in traumatic spinal cord injury: Advances beyond sum scores.创伤性脊髓损伤节段性运动预后的预测:超越总和评分的进展。
Exp Neurol. 2024 Oct;380:114905. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2024.114905. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
4
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration for neurological improvement in patients with postrehabilitation chronic incomplete traumatic spinal cord injuries: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.粒细胞集落刺激因子对康复后慢性不完全性创伤性脊髓损伤患者神经功能改善的作用:一项双盲随机对照临床试验
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jul;29(1):97-107. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.SPINE17769. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
5
Neurological and functional status 1 year after acute spinal cord injury: estimates of functional recovery in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study II from results modeled in National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study III.急性脊髓损伤1年后的神经和功能状态:根据国家急性脊髓损伤研究III的模型结果对国家急性脊髓损伤研究II中的功能恢复情况进行评估。
J Neurosurg. 2002 Apr;96(3 Suppl):259-66. doi: 10.3171/spi.2002.96.3.0259.
6
Against the odds: what to expect in rehabilitation of chronic spinal cord injury with a neurologically controlled Hybrid Assistive Limb exoskeleton. A subgroup analysis of 55 patients according to age and lesion level.克服重重困难:使用神经控制的混合辅助肢体外骨骼对慢性脊髓损伤进行康复治疗的预期效果。根据年龄和损伤水平对55例患者进行的亚组分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E15. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.FOCUS171.
7
Evaluation of a ketogenic diet for improvement of neurological recovery in individuals with acute spinal cord injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.生酮饮食改善急性脊髓损伤患者神经功能恢复的评价:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 May 4;21(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04273-7.
8
Riluzole in Spinal Cord Injury Study (RISCIS)-Pharmacokinetic (PK) Sub-Study: An Analysis of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Impact on Axonal Degradation of Riluzole in Patients With Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Enrolled in the RISCIS Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial.利鲁唑脊髓损伤研究(RISCIS)-药代动力学(PK)子研究:对参加RISCIS III期随机对照试验的创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者中利鲁唑的药代动力学、药效学及其对轴突降解影响的分析
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Sep;40(17-18):1889-1906. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0499.
9
Prediction of bladder outcomes after ischemic spinal cord injury: A longitudinal cohort study from the European multicenter study about spinal cord injury.缺血性脊髓损伤后膀胱结局的预测:来自欧洲脊髓损伤多中心研究的纵向队列研究。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jun;37(5):1779-1784. doi: 10.1002/nau.23521. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
External Validation Confirms Validity of a Simple Model to Predict Bowel Outcome After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.外部验证证实了一种简单模型预测创伤性脊髓损伤后肠道结局的有效性。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Aug;35(8):659-662. doi: 10.1177/15459683211023191. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Landscape of Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury.探索脊髓损伤生物标志物的前景
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2025 Spring;31(2):1-12. doi: 10.46292/sci24-00076. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting 7-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.用于预测创伤性脊髓损伤重症患者7天死亡率的机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项多中心回顾性研究
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02308-y.
3
Identification of needs for an assistive robotic arm in individuals with tetraplegia: a mixed-methods approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptive trial designs for spinal cord injury clinical trials directed to the central nervous system.用于针对中枢神经系统的脊髓损伤临床试验的适应性试验设计。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Dec;58(12):1235-1248. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-00547-8. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
2
Acute Traumatic and Ischemic Spinal Cord Injuries Have a Comparable Course of Recovery.急性创伤性和缺血性脊髓损伤的恢复过程相似。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 Aug;34(8):723-732. doi: 10.1177/1545968320939569. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
3
Updates of the International Standards for Neurologic Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: 2015 and 2019.
四肢瘫痪患者对辅助机器人手臂需求的识别:一种混合方法。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 May 20;22(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01642-8.
4
Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation of dysphagia in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.脊髓损伤患者吞咽困难的诊断与康复方法:一项系统综述
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2025 Feb;61(1):41-51. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08614-3. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
5
Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers and Long-Term Motor Score Recovery in Patients With Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.急性颈脊髓损伤患者的医院获得性压疮与长期运动评分恢复
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2444983. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44983.
6
Impact of commonly administered drugs on the progression of spinal cord injury: a systematic review.常用药物对脊髓损伤进展的影响:一项系统综述
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Oct 24;4(1):213. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00638-0.
7
Next-gen spinal cord injury clinical trials: lessons learned and opportunities for future success.下一代脊髓损伤临床试验:经验教训和未来成功的机会。
EBioMedicine. 2024 Nov;109:105381. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105381. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
8
An updated systematic review of neuroprotective agents in the treatment of spinal cord injury.神经保护剂治疗脊髓损伤的更新系统评价。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Mar 28;47(1):132. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02372-6.
9
Studying missingness in spinal cord injury data: challenges and impact of data imputation.研究脊髓损伤数据中的缺失值:数据插补的挑战和影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jan 6;24(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02125-x.
10
Assessing an Online Patient Decision Aid about Upper Extremity Reconstructive Surgery for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Testing Knowledge, Decisional Conflict, and Acceptability.评估一款关于颈椎脊髓损伤上肢重建手术的在线患者决策辅助工具:知识、决策冲突及可接受性的初步测试
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Oct 18;8(2):23814683231199721. doi: 10.1177/23814683231199721. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.
国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准更新:2015 年和 2019 年。
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2020 Aug;31(3):319-330. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
Can real-world data really replace randomised clinical trials?真实世界数据真的能取代随机临床试验吗?
BMC Med. 2020 Jan 15;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1481-8.
5
The Effect of Non-Gabapentinoid Anticonvulsants on Sensorimotor Recovery After Human Spinal Cord Injury.非加巴喷丁类抗惊厥药对人脊髓损伤后感觉运动功能恢复的影响。
CNS Drugs. 2019 May;33(5):503-511. doi: 10.1007/s40263-019-00622-6.
6
Natural History, Predictors of Outcome, and Effects of Treatment in Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury: A Multi-Center Cohort Study from the North American Clinical Trials Network.胸段脊髓损伤的自然史、结局预测因素和治疗效果:来自北美临床试验网络的多中心队列研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Nov 1;35(21):2554-2560. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5535. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
7
Age-specific characterization of spinal cord injuries over a 19-year period at a Japanese rehabilitation center.19 年间日本康复中心脊髓损伤患者的年龄特征分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 29;13(3):e0195120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195120. eCollection 2018.
8
SCIM III (Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III): reliability of assessment by interview and comparison with assessment by observation.SCIM III(脊髓独立性测量版本 III):通过访谈评估的可靠性和与观察评估的比较。
Spinal Cord. 2018 Jan;56(1):46-51. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.97. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
9
Does Specialized Inpatient Rehabilitation Affect Whether or Not People with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Return Home?专门的住院康复治疗是否会影响创伤性脊髓损伤患者是否能够回家?
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Oct 15;34(20):2867-2876. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4930. Epub 2017 May 24.
10
Early Administration of Gabapentinoids Improves Motor Recovery after Human Spinal Cord Injury.加巴喷丁类药物的早期使用可改善人类脊髓损伤后的运动恢复。
Cell Rep. 2017 Feb 14;18(7):1614-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.048.