Alizade Elchin, İlhan Mehmet, Durak Görkem, Kaan Gok Ali Fuat, Ertekin Cemalettin
Department of General Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Radiology, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Jul-Sep;18(3):431-437. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_259_21.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting diaphragmatic injury by comparing preoperative computed tomography (CT) and MRI imaging results with diagnostic laparoscopy/thoracoscopy results in patients with left thoracoabdominal penetrating injury. We investigated whether MRI reduces the rate of unnecessary surgery by examining its sensitivity and specificity.
Patients with left thoracoabdominal penetrating injuries who applied to the Emergency Surgery Unit of Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine between November 2017 and December 2020 were evaluated. Patients who underwent emergency surgery, who could not undergo MRI or CT for any reason or who could not be operated on were excluded from the study. Preoperative MRI and CT images of patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy/thoracoscopy due to left thoracoabdominal injury in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively by a radiologist who did not know the surgical results. MRI results of the cases were compared with surgical findings and CT images.
A total of 43 (41 males, mean age: 31, range: 15-57) patients were included in the study. The most common physical examination finding was lateral injury. The diaphragmatic injury was detected in 13 (30%) cases during surgical interventions. Laparoscopic repair was performed in 11 (84%) cases and thoracoscopic repair was performed in 2 (15%) cases with diaphragmatic injuries. MRI images of 14 (32%) cases were found to be compatible with diaphragmatic injury, in 1 of them no injury was observed during surgical intervention. According to these data, the sensitivity of MRI was calculated as 100%, specificity 94%, positive predictive value 86%, and negative predictive value 100%. The mean hospital stay was 6 days (1-30) in all cases.
In our study, MRI was found to have high specificity and sensitivity in detecting diaphragmatic injuries. The number of negative laparoscopy/thoracoscopy can be reduced by performing surgical intervention only in cases with positive or suspected diaphragmatic injury on MRI. Results should be supported by conducting new studies with larger case series with normal MRI findings and long follow-ups.
在本研究中,我们旨在通过比较术前计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)的影像结果与左胸腹穿透伤患者的诊断性腹腔镜检查/胸腔镜检查结果,来研究MRI在检测膈肌损伤方面的效果。我们通过检查其敏感性和特异性来研究MRI是否能降低不必要的手术率。
对2017年11月至2020年12月期间到伊斯坦布尔大学伊斯坦布尔医学院急诊外科就诊的左胸腹穿透伤患者进行评估。排除那些接受了急诊手术、因任何原因无法进行MRI或CT检查或无法进行手术的患者。由一位不知道手术结果的放射科医生对因左胸腹损伤在我们诊所接受诊断性腹腔镜检查/胸腔镜检查的患者的术前MRI和CT图像进行回顾性评估。将病例的MRI结果与手术结果和CT图像进行比较。
共有43例(41例男性,平均年龄:31岁,范围:15 - 57岁)患者纳入研究。最常见的体格检查发现是侧方损伤。在手术干预期间,13例(30%)患者被检测出膈肌损伤。11例(84%)膈肌损伤患者进行了腹腔镜修复,2例(15%)进行了胸腔镜修复。14例(32%)患者的MRI图像被发现与膈肌损伤相符,其中1例在手术干预期间未观察到损伤。根据这些数据,计算出MRI的敏感性为100%,特异性为94%,阳性预测值为86%,阴性预测值为100%。所有病例的平均住院时间为6天(1 - 30天)。
在我们的研究中,发现MRI在检测膈肌损伤方面具有高特异性和敏感性。仅对MRI上有阳性或疑似膈肌损伤的病例进行手术干预,可以减少阴性腹腔镜检查/胸腔镜检查的数量。结果应通过对具有正常MRI表现且随访时间长的更大病例系列进行新的研究来加以支持。