Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), the Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre (RadboudUMC), Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2022 Jun;14(2):181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 May 25.
Following the recognition of the adverse effects of right ventricular pacing, alternative permanent pacing strategies aiming to maintain a synchronous ventricular contraction have been sought. The quest for the optimal pacing site has recently led to several promising and rapidly emerging new pacing strategies, such as left ventricular septal pacing and left bundle branch pacing. In both animal and human studies, these pacing strategies seem to maintain electrical and mechanical activation of the left ventricle to a (near)physiologic level. However, more studies on the long-term effects of both strategies are needed.
继认识到右心室起搏的不良影响后,人们一直在寻找旨在维持心室同步收缩的替代永久性起搏策略。对于最佳起搏部位的探索最近导致了几种有前途且迅速涌现的新起搏策略,如左心室间隔起搏和左束支起搏。在动物和人体研究中,这些起搏策略似乎能将左心室的电和机械激活维持在(接近)生理水平。然而,仍需要更多研究来评估这两种策略的长期效果。