Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jul;37(7):1657-1668. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04179-7. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
The objective was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis in patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer.
Patients with cT3-4N0M0 or cTxN1-2M0 rectal cancer were included in this retrospective study. Patients who received NCRT (radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine) or TNT (radiotherapy with two concurrent cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) followed by another two cycles of CAPOX) during January 2011 and November 2016 at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University were included. All patients had received radical surgery. Adverse events, pathological response and survival outcomes in the two groups were compared.
One hundred eighty-two patients were enrolled, 120 in the TNT and 62 in the NCRT groups. No significant between-group differences in neoadjuvant therapy-associated adverse events or surgical complications were found. TNT achieved a higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate (25.8%) compared with NCRT (12.9%, P = 0.044). Patients in the TNT group had a higher 3-year DFS rate (82.8% versus 75.7%, P = 0.041) and lower distant metastasis rate (19.2% versus 33.1%, P = 0.049) than those in the NCRT group. Multivariate analysis showed that NCRT was an independent risk factor for DFS (95%CI 2.023-13.415, P = 0.001) and distant metastasis (95% CI 2.149-20.082, P = 0.001).
With similar adverse events and a higher pCR rate when compared with NCRT, TNT might be considered as a safe and effective therapeutic strategy to improve prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
比较新辅助放化疗(NCRT)和全新辅助治疗(TNT)治疗局部进展期直肠癌患者的无病生存率(DFS)和远处转移情况。
本回顾性研究纳入了 cT3-4N0M0 或 cTxN1-2M0 局部进展期直肠癌患者。纳入 2011 年 1 月至 2016 年 11 月期间在北京朝阳医院首都医科大学接受 NCRT(放疗联合卡培他滨)或 TNT(放疗联合两周期卡培他滨和奥沙利铂(CAPOX),随后再行两周期 CAPOX)治疗并接受根治性手术的患者。比较两组患者的不良事件、病理反应和生存结局。
共纳入 182 例患者,其中 TNT 组 120 例,NCRT 组 62 例。两组患者的新辅助治疗相关不良事件或手术并发症发生率无显著差异。TNT 组的病理完全缓解(pCR)率(25.8%)显著高于 NCRT 组(12.9%,P=0.044)。TNT 组患者的 3 年 DFS 率(82.8%比 75.7%,P=0.041)更高,远处转移率(19.2%比 33.1%,P=0.049)更低。多因素分析显示,NCRT 是 DFS(95%CI 2.023-13.415,P=0.001)和远处转移(95%CI 2.149-20.082,P=0.001)的独立危险因素。
与 NCRT 相比,TNT 具有相似的不良事件发生率和更高的 pCR 率,可能是改善局部进展期直肠癌患者预后的一种安全有效的治疗策略。