• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一家社区医院中新冠疫情前两波的临床特征与结局:一项回顾性队列研究

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in a community hospital: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Egoryan Goar, Yanez-Bello Maria A, Ozcekirdek Emre C, Zhang Qishuo, Poudel Bidhya, Ozen Ece, Trelles-Garcia Daniela P, Chung Chul Won, Ginsburg Beth, Friedman Harvey J, Rodriguez-Nava Guillermo

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, AMITA Health Saint Francis Hospital, Evanston, IL.

Department of Internal Medicine, AMITA Health Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

IJID Reg. 2022 Jun;3:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.02.001
PMID:35720147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8817945/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A de-identified dataset of patients with COVID-19 admitted to our community hospital in Evanston, Illinois, from March 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients from the first wave were identified as those admitted during the initial peak of admissions observed at our hospital between March 1, 2020 and September 3, 2020. The second wave was defined as those admitted during the second peak of admissions observed between October 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021.

RESULTS

In total, 671 patients were included. Of these, 399 (59.46%) were identified as patients from the first wave and 272 (40.54%) as patients from the second wave. Significantly more patients received steroids (86.4% vs 47.9%, < 0.001), remdesivir (59.6% vs 9.5%, < 0.001), humidified high-flow nasal cannula (18% vs 6.5%, < 0.001), and noninvasive ventilation (11.8% vs 3.3%, < 0.001) during the second wave. Patients from the first wave had a greater hazard for death compared with patients from the second wave (hazard ratio [HR] 1.62, 95% CI 1.08-2.43;  = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in our community hospital, there was a decrease in case-fatality rate in the second surge of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the first wave.

摘要

目的

描述新冠疫情两波疫情的临床特征和结果。

方法

回顾性分析了2020年3月1日至2021年2月28日在伊利诺伊州埃文斯顿我们社区医院收治的新冠患者的去识别数据集。第一波患者被确定为在2020年3月1日至2020年9月3日我们医院观察到的入院初始高峰期间入院的患者。第二波被定义为在2020年10月1日至2021年2月28日观察到的入院第二个高峰期间入院的患者。

结果

共纳入671例患者。其中,399例(59.46%)被确定为第一波患者,272例(40.54%)为第二波患者。在第二波疫情期间,接受类固醇治疗的患者显著增多(86.4%对47.9%,<0.001),瑞德西韦(59.6%对9.5%,<0.001),高流量湿化鼻导管吸氧(18%对6.5%,<0.001),以及无创通气(11.8%对3.3%,<0.001)。与第二波患者相比,第一波患者的死亡风险更高(风险比[HR]1.62,95%可信区间1.08 - 2.43;P = 0.019)。

结论

在我们社区医院收治的新冠住院患者中,与第一波相比,新冠疫情第二波高峰时的病死率有所下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ef/9216266/d6c90a9a8aa8/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ef/9216266/170309784426/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ef/9216266/d6c90a9a8aa8/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ef/9216266/170309784426/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3ef/9216266/d6c90a9a8aa8/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in a community hospital: a retrospective cohort study.一家社区医院中新冠疫情前两波的临床特征与结局:一项回顾性队列研究
IJID Reg. 2022 Jun;3:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
2
Stroke Care During the First and the Second Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Community Hospital.一家社区医院在新冠疫情第一波和第二波期间的中风护理情况
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 2;12:655434. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.655434. eCollection 2021.
3
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit during the first and second waves of the pandemic in Brazil: a single-center retrospective cohort study.巴西第一波和第二波大流行期间入住重症监护病房的 COVID-19 患者的临床特征和结局:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2023 Jul 21;21:eAO0233. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0233. eCollection 2023.
4
[Comparative analysis of clinical characteristics, evolution and mortality of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 during the first and second wave of the pandemic (ECCOVID Study)].[大流行第一波和第二波期间新冠病毒病住院患者的临床特征、病情演变及死亡率的比较分析(ECCOVID研究)]
Medicina (B Aires). 2023;83(4):551-557.
5
Difference in mortality among individuals admitted to hospital with COVID-19 during the first and second waves in South Africa: a cohort study.南非第一波和第二波期间因 COVID-19 住院的个体的死亡率差异:一项队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Sep;9(9):e1216-e1225. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00289-8. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
6
Mortality due to COVID-19 infection: A comparison of first and second waves.新型冠状病毒肺炎感染导致的死亡率:第一波与第二波的比较。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021 Nov 15;11(6):747-752. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1978154. eCollection 2021.
7
Clinical profile of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in first & second wave of the pandemic: Insights from an Indian registry based observational study.COVID-19 住院患者在第一波和第二波大流行期间的临床特征:来自印度基于观察性研究登记的观察结果。
Indian J Med Res. 2021 May;153(5&6):619-628. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1628_21.
8
Comparison of characteristics, predictors and outcomes between the first and second COVID-19 waves in a tertiary care centre in Switzerland: an observational analysis.瑞士一家三级保健中心的第一波和第二波 COVID-19 之间的特征、预测因素和结局比较:一项观察性分析。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Aug 10;151:w20569. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.20569. eCollection 2021 Aug 2.
9
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in a Brazilian hospital: a retrospective study of the first and second waves.巴西一家医院新冠肺炎住院患者的临床特征及结局:对第一波和第二波疫情的回顾性研究
IJID Reg. 2022 Jun;3:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Pregnant Women With SARS-CoV-2 Infection During the First and Second Wave of COVID-19 in a Tertiary Care Institute in Eastern India.印度东部一家三级医疗机构中,新冠疫情第一波和第二波期间感染SARS-CoV-2的孕妇的母婴结局
Cureus. 2022 Feb 18;14(2):e22360. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22360. eCollection 2022 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of COVID-19 patients with multiorgan injury across the pandemic in a large academic health system in the Bronx, New York.纽约布朗克斯区一个大型学术医疗系统中新冠疫情期间多器官损伤的新冠肺炎患者特征。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr;9(4):e15277. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15277. Epub 2023 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality during the first two waves of the Coronavirus Pandemic: a nationwide cohort study of 29 million adults in England.新冠大流行前两波期间 COVID-19 死亡率的种族差异:英格兰 2900 万成年人的全国队列研究。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;36(6):605-617. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00765-1. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
2
Outcome Improvement Between the First Two Waves of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in a Single Tertiary-Care Hospital in Belgium.比利时一家三级护理医院在2019年冠状病毒病大流行的前两波期间的结果改善情况。
Crit Care Explor. 2021 May 19;3(5):e0438. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000438. eCollection 2021 May.
3
First and second waves of coronavirus disease-19: A comparative study in hospitalized patients in Reus, Spain.
新冠肺炎疫情的第一波和第二波:西班牙雷乌斯住院患者的对比研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 31;16(3):e0248029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248029. eCollection 2021.
4
Second versus first wave of COVID-19 deaths: Shifts in age distribution and in nursing home fatalities.第二波与第一波 COVID-19 死亡:年龄分布和养老院死亡人数的变化。
Environ Res. 2021 Apr;195:110856. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110856. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
5
Decreased COVID-19 Mortality-A Cause for Optimism.新冠病毒疾病死亡率下降——令人乐观的理由。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Apr 1;181(4):478-479. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8438.
6
Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.地塞米松在 COVID-19 住院患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
7
Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 - Final Report.瑞德西韦治疗 COVID-19 的疗效 - 最终报告。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813-1826. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007764. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
8
Five myths about variable selection.关于变量选择的五个误区。
Transpl Int. 2017 Jan;30(1):6-10. doi: 10.1111/tri.12895.
9
Hazard ratio in clinical trials.临床试验中的风险比。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Aug;48(8):2787-92. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.8.2787-2792.2004.