• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学出版中的个人诚信与公共道德。

Individual integrity and public morality in scientific publishing.

作者信息

Della-Sala Sergio

机构信息

University of Edinburgh, Human Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychology, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Dement Neuropsychol. 2022 Apr-Jun;16(2):129-134. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-V001. Epub 2022 May 13.

DOI:10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-V001
PMID:35720652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9173789/
Abstract

Science and science reporting are under threat. Knowingly or not, researchers and clinicians are part of this debacle. This is not due so much to the notorious replication crisis, as to our acceptance of lowering common morality for personal gains, including the widespread, deprecable phenomenon of predatory publishing. Rather than fiercefully countering this loathsome practice, academics are accepting, often supporting a masquerade solution: paying several thousand dollars to publish for all their own papers. This new policy will create a disparity across richer and poorer disciplines; will result in concentrating even more in the hands of large, rich, Western institutions, also penalising younger researchers; will kill observational studies and exploratory research; and will make disseminating science depending more on finances than on quality. This article calls for the full awareness of the academic community on the risks of the current situation in scientific publishing.

摘要

科学及科学报道正受到威胁。无论有意与否,研究人员和临床医生都是这场灾难的一部分。这与其说是由于臭名昭著的复制危机,不如说是因为我们为了个人利益而接受降低共同道德标准,包括普遍存在的、应受谴责的掠夺性出版现象。学者们不是坚决抵制这种令人厌恶的做法,而是接受,甚至常常支持一种伪装的解决方案:为自己所有的论文支付数千美元来发表。这项新政策将在贫富学科之间造成差距;将导致更多资源集中在大型、富裕的西方机构手中,同时也会惩罚年轻研究人员;将扼杀观察性研究和探索性研究;并将使科学传播更多地取决于资金而非质量。本文呼吁学术界充分认识到科学出版当前形势的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9173789/816d1c14c3b6/1980-5764-dn-1980-5764-dn-2022-v001-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9173789/816d1c14c3b6/1980-5764-dn-1980-5764-dn-2022-v001-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9173789/816d1c14c3b6/1980-5764-dn-1980-5764-dn-2022-v001-gf1.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual integrity and public morality in scientific publishing.科学出版中的个人诚信与公共道德。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2022 Apr-Jun;16(2):129-134. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-V001. Epub 2022 May 13.
2
False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals.假金:安全浏览开放获取出版以避免掠夺性出版商和期刊。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):809-817. doi: 10.1111/jan.13483. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
3
Extent of publishing in predatory journals by academics in higher education institutions in Zimbabwe: A case study of a university.津巴布韦高等教育机构学者在掠夺性期刊上发表论文的情况:以一所大学为例
Account Res. 2025 Feb;32(2):143-157. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2256672. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
4
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
5
Predatory journals: The rise of worthless biomedical science.掠夺性期刊:毫无价值的生物医学科学的兴起。
J Postgrad Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;64(4):226-231. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_347_18.
6
Academic nightmares: Predatory publishing.学术噩梦:掠夺性出版。
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Jul;10(4):392-394. doi: 10.1002/ase.1671. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
7
Predatory publishing and cybercrime targeting academics.针对学者的掠夺性出版和网络犯罪。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2018 Apr;24 Suppl 1:e12656. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12656.
8
Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊时代学术作者的最佳实践。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.
9
[Predatory journals: how their publishers operate and how to avoid them].[掠夺性期刊:其出版商的运作方式以及如何避开它们]
Vnitr Lek. 2017 Winter;63(1):5-13.
10
Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research.警惕掠夺性科学期刊:对医学研究诚信的潜在威胁。
Clin Anat. 2017 Sep;30(6):767-773. doi: 10.1002/ca.22899. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality peer review is mandatory for scientific journals: ethical constraints, computers, and progress of communication with the reviewers of International Orthopaedics.高质量同行评审对科学期刊来说是必不可少的:道德约束、计算机以及与《国际骨科学杂志》审稿人的沟通进展。
Int Orthop. 2023 Mar;47(3):605-609. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05715-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Strengthening derivation chains in cognitive neuroscience: A special issue of Cortex.加强认知神经科学中的推导链条:《皮质》特刊
Cortex. 2022 Jan;146:A1-A4. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.12.002.
2
The past, present and future of Registered Reports.注册报告的过去、现在与未来。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Jan;6(1):29-42. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01193-7. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
3
Predatory publishers' latest scam: bootlegged and rebranded papers.掠夺性出版商的最新骗局:盗印并重新包装的论文。
Nature. 2021 Oct;598(7882):563-565. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02906-8.
4
Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones.不可复制的出版物比可复制的出版物被引用得更多。
Sci Adv. 2021 May 21;7(21). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd1705. Print 2021 May.
5
A guide to Plan S: the open-access initiative shaking up science publishing.《“计划S”指南:震动科学出版界的开放获取倡议》
Nature. 2021 Apr 8. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00883-6.
6
Verification Reports: A new article type at Cortex.验证报告:《大脑皮层》的一种新文章类型。
Cortex. 2020 Aug;129:A1-A3. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.020. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams.由多个团队对单个神经影像学数据集进行分析的可变性。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7810):84-88. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2314-9. Epub 2020 May 20.
8
The good, the bad and the rude peer-review.同行评议的优劣与粗陋之处
Int Orthop. 2020 Mar;44(3):413-415. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04504-1.
9
When no more research is needed (without further reflection).当不再需要进行更多研究时(无需进一步思考)。
Cortex. 2020 Feb;123:A1. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.018. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
10
Predatory journals: no definition, no defence.掠夺性期刊:无定义,无辩护。
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7786):210-212. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y.