Chen Ziyan, Wu Jinlong, Wang Xiaodong, Ren Zhanbing
College of Physical Education, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
College of Physical Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Heliyon. 2022 Jun 6;8(6):e09656. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09656. eCollection 2022 Jun.
This research quantitatively studied the benefits of foot orthoses for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) from five aspects: pain intensity, knee function, sport and recreation function, knee symptoms, and knee related quality of life.
Potential articles were retrieved using five electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang). The search period was from inception to October 17, 2021.
Two researchers independently completed record retrieval and selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model or fixed-effect model and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Data from six randomized controlled trials (RCT) meeting the inclusion criteria were extracted for meta-analysis with methodological quality assessment scores ranging from seven to ten.
Results showed that compared to the control group, foot orthoses can significantly improve knee function (SMD = -0.45[-0.74, -0.16], = 0.002, = 0%), and improve sport and recreation function (SMD = -0.54[-1.04, -0.03], = 0.04, = 0%). But the foot orthoses had no significant effect in pain intensity (SMD = -0.01[-0.32, 0.30], = 0.95, = 64), knee injury symptoms (SMD = -0.36[-0.86, 0.14], = 0.16, = 0%), and knee related quality of life (SMD = -0.45[-0.95, 0.05], = 0.08, = 0%).Subgroup analysis of pain intensity showed that foot orthoses had some effect compared to flat/soft inserts (SMD = -0.28[-0.57, 0.00], = 0.05, = 0%). The effect of other treatments (physiotherapy and gait retraining) was significantly better than that of foot orthoses (SMD = 0.45[0.09, 0.80], = 0.01, = 46%). Compared with exercise alone, the effect of foot orthoses combined with exercise was more significant (SMD = -0.98[-1.64, -0.32], = 0.004).
The findings suggested that foot orthoses significantly improved knee function and sport and recreation function in patients with PFPS, but had no significant effect on pain intensity, knee injury symptoms, and knee related quality of life. This study supported the positive therapeutic effect of foot orthoses on PFPS.
本研究从疼痛强度、膝关节功能、运动和娱乐功能、膝关节症状以及膝关节相关生活质量五个方面,对足矫形器治疗髌股关节疼痛综合征(PFPS)患者的益处进行了定量研究。
通过五个电子数据库(科学网、PubMed、Scopus、中国知网和万方)检索潜在文章。检索时间段为建库至2021年10月17日。
两名研究人员独立完成记录检索与筛选、数据提取以及方法学质量评估。采用随机效应模型或固定效应模型及95%置信区间(95%CI)计算合并效应量。提取六项符合纳入标准的随机对照试验(RCT)数据进行荟萃分析,方法学质量评估得分在7至10分之间。
结果显示,与对照组相比,足矫形器可显著改善膝关节功能(标准化均数差[SMD]=-0.45[-0.74,-0.16],P=0.002,I²=0%),并改善运动和娱乐功能(SMD=-0.54[-1.04,-0.03],P=0.04,I²=0%)。但足矫形器在疼痛强度(SMD=-0.01[-0.32,0.30],P=0.95,I²=64%)、膝关节损伤症状(SMD=-0.36[-0.86,0.14],P=0.16,I²=0%)以及膝关节相关生活质量(SMD=-0.45[-0.95,0.05],P=0.08,I²=0%)方面无显著效果。疼痛强度的亚组分析显示,与平底/软鞋垫相比,足矫形器有一定效果(SMD=-0.28[-0.57,0.00],P=0.05,I²=0%)。其他治疗方法(物理治疗和步态再训练)的效果显著优于足矫形器(SMD=0.45[0.09,0.80],P=0.01,I²=46%)。与单纯运动相比,足矫形器联合运动的效果更显著(SMD=-0.98[-1.64,-0.32],P=0.004)。
研究结果表明,足矫形器可显著改善PFPS患者的膝关节功能以及运动和娱乐功能,但对疼痛强度、膝关节损伤症状及膝关节相关生活质量无显著影响。本研究支持足矫形器对PFPS的积极治疗作用。