• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响就地养老和长期护理规划的认知方面。

Aspects of cognition that impact aging-in-place and long-term care planning.

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

Division of Preventative Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2646-2652. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17927. Epub 2022 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.17927
PMID:35726136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9489627/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults frequently defer decisions about their aging-in-place/long-term care (AIP-LTC) needs. As a result, when older adults experience worsening Alzheimer's disease, family members/friends become surrogate decision makers. We sought to understand what aspects of cognition impact older adult AIP-LTC planning.

METHODS

As part of the PlanYourLifespan (PYL)-LitCog study, we longitudinally examined AIP-LTC decision-making among a cohort (LitCog) of community-based older adults (65 years and older) recruited from hospital-associated primary care clinics in Chicago, Illinois, with extensive cognitive testing. PlanYourLifespan.org (PYL) is an evidence-based online intervention that facilitates AIP-LTC planning. Subjects underwent baseline testing, received the PYL online intervention, and then were surveyed at 1, 6, and 12 months about AIP-LTC decision-making. Cross-sectional logistic regression analysis was conducted examining cognitive variables that impacted AIP-LTC decision-making.

RESULTS

Of the 293 older adults interviewed (mean age 73.0 years, 40.4% non-White), subjects were more likely to have made AIP-LTC decisions if they had adequate inductive reasoning (ETS letter sets total-OR = 1.14 (95% CI = 1.03-1.27; p < 0.05)) and adequate working memory (size judgment span total-OR = 1.76 (95% CI = 1.13-2.73; p < 0.05)). There were no differences in decision-making observed in verbal abilities, long-term memory, or processing speed. All analyses were adjusted for participant gender, race, age, and decision-making response at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Inductive reasoning and working memory are critical to AIP-LTC decision-making. Screening routinely for these specific cognitive domains is important in targeting and helping older adults prepare in time for their future AIP-LTC needs.

摘要

背景

老年人经常推迟有关他们就地养老/长期护理(AIP-LTC)需求的决策。因此,当老年人的阿尔茨海默病恶化时,家庭成员/朋友成为替代决策者。我们试图了解认知的哪些方面会影响老年人的 AIP-LTC 规划。

方法

作为 PlanYourLifespan(PYL)-LitCog 研究的一部分,我们对来自伊利诺伊州芝加哥医院附属初级保健诊所的社区老年人(65 岁及以上)队列(LitCog)进行了 AIP-LTC 决策的纵向研究,对他们进行了广泛的认知测试。PlanYourLifespan.org(PYL)是一种基于证据的在线干预措施,可以促进 AIP-LTC 规划。受试者接受基线测试,接受 PYL 在线干预,然后在 1、6 和 12 个月时接受关于 AIP-LTC 决策的调查。进行了横断面逻辑回归分析,以检查影响 AIP-LTC 决策的认知变量。

结果

在接受采访的 293 名老年人中(平均年龄 73.0 岁,40.4%为非白人),如果他们具有足够的归纳推理能力(ETS 字母集总数的优势比[OR]为 1.14(95%置信区间[CI]为 1.03-1.27;p<0.05))和足够的工作记忆能力(大小判断跨度总数的优势比[OR]为 1.76(95%CI 为 1.13-2.73;p<0.05)),他们更有可能做出 AIP-LTC 决策。在言语能力、长期记忆或处理速度方面,没有观察到决策方面的差异。所有分析均调整了参与者的性别、种族、年龄和基线时的决策反应。

结论

归纳推理和工作记忆对 AIP-LTC 决策至关重要。常规筛查这些特定的认知领域对于确定目标人群并帮助老年人及时为未来的 AIP-LTC 需求做好准备非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9259/9796315/54af7d4f97cd/JGS-70-2646-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9259/9796315/54af7d4f97cd/JGS-70-2646-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9259/9796315/54af7d4f97cd/JGS-70-2646-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Aspects of cognition that impact aging-in-place and long-term care planning.影响就地养老和长期护理规划的认知方面。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2646-2652. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17927. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
2
Rationale and study design for decision making & implementation of aging-in-place/long term care plans among older adults.老年人就地养老/长期护理计划决策与实施的基本原理及研究设计
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Mar 16;22:100756. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100756. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Longitudinal Follow-Up of Long-Term Care Planning Using PlanYourLifespan.org.使用 PlanYourLifespan.org 进行长期护理规划的纵向随访。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 May;40(5):536-540. doi: 10.1177/0733464820943066. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
4
Relationship between frailty and long-term care needs in Chinese community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study.中国社区居住的老年人虚弱与长期护理需求的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e051801. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051801.
5
The role of cognitive function in the relationship between age and health literacy: a cross-sectional analysis of older adults in Chicago, USA.认知功能在美国芝加哥老年人年龄与健康素养关系中的作用:一项横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 23;5(4):e007222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007222.
6
Associations of multilingualism and language proficiency with cognitive functioning: epidemiological evidence from the SwissDEM study in community dwelling older adults and long-term care residents.多语言能力和语言熟练程度与认知功能的关联:来自瑞士社区居住的老年人和长期护理居民的 SwissDEM 研究的流行病学证据。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04311-4.
7
Association of potentially inappropriate medications and need for long-term care among older adults: a matched cohort study.老年人潜在不适当药物与长期护理需求的关联:一项匹配队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):972. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03681-5.
8
Factors associated with older people's long-term care needs: a case study adopting the expanded version of the Anderson Model in China.与老年人长期护理需求相关的因素:一项在中国采用安德森模型扩展版的案例研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0436-1.
9
Factors related to the decision-making for moving the older adults into long-term care facilities in Taiwan.与将老年人转移到台湾长期护理机构的决策相关的因素。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Sep;17(9):1319-1327. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12860. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
PlanYourLifeSpan.org - an intervention to help seniors make choices for their fourth quarter of life: Results from the randomized clinical trial.PlanYourLifeSpan.org - 一项帮助老年人为人生第四季做出选择的干预措施:随机临床试验结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Nov;100(11):1996-2004. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification and synthesis of end-of-life decision-making measures: a scoping review.临终决策措施的识别与综合:一项范围综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 31;12:1540486. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1540486. eCollection 2025.
2
What Changed Your Mind? Influencers of Older Adults Changing Decisions About Aging-In-Place Versus Long-Term Care.是什么改变了你的想法?影响老年人改变居家养老与长期护理决策的因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19475.
3
Development and validation of an experimental verbal Episodic Memory task in Spanish.

本文引用的文献

1
Aging-in-place preferences and institutionalization among Japanese older adults: a 7-year longitudinal study.日本老年人就地老化偏好与机构化:一项 7 年纵向研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02766-5.
2
Out-of-pocket expenses related to aging in place for frail older people: a scoping review.与体弱老年人就地养老相关的自付费用:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Feb;20(2):537-605. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00413.
3
Rationale and study design for decision making & implementation of aging-in-place/long term care plans among older adults.
发展和验证西班牙语实验性词语情节记忆任务。
Codas. 2023 Sep 18;35(4):e20220067. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022067es. eCollection 2023.
4
Subjective cognitive decline and missed aging-in-place/long-term care planning.主观认知衰退与错失就地养老/长期护理规划
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Oct;71(10):3314-3316. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18425. Epub 2023 May 26.
老年人就地养老/长期护理计划决策与实施的基本原理及研究设计
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Mar 16;22:100756. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100756. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Rates of Cognitive and Functional Impairments in Older Adults Residing in a Continuing Care Senior Housing Community.老年人在持续照料高级住房社区中的认知和功能障碍的发生率。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022 Jan;28(1):62-73. doi: 10.1017/S1355617721000163. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
Dynamic awareness of age-related losses predict concurrent and subsequent changes in daily inductive reasoning performance.动态感知与年龄相关的损失可预测当前和随后日常归纳推理表现的变化。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2021 Jun;39(2):282-298. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12344. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
6
Longitudinal Follow-Up of Long-Term Care Planning Using PlanYourLifespan.org.使用 PlanYourLifespan.org 进行长期护理规划的纵向随访。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 May;40(5):536-540. doi: 10.1177/0733464820943066. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
7
Overcoming Reluctance to Accept Home-Based Support from an Older Adult Perspective.克服老年人对家庭支持的抵触情绪。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Sep;66(9):1796-1799. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15526. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
8
Choosing between staying at home or moving: A systematic review of factors influencing housing decisions among frail older adults.居家还是迁居的抉择:对影响体弱老年人住房决策因素的系统评价
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189266. eCollection 2018.
9
PlanYourLifeSpan.org - an intervention to help seniors make choices for their fourth quarter of life: Results from the randomized clinical trial.PlanYourLifeSpan.org - 一项帮助老年人为人生第四季做出选择的干预措施:随机临床试验结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Nov;100(11):1996-2004. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Engaging Older Adults in Health Care Decision-Making: A Realist Synthesis.让老年人参与医疗保健决策:一项实在论综合分析
Patient. 2016 Oct;9(5):383-93. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0168-x.