• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人就地养老/长期护理计划决策与实施的基本原理及研究设计

Rationale and study design for decision making & implementation of aging-in-place/long term care plans among older adults.

作者信息

Lindquist Lee A, Muhammad Ruqayyah, Miller-Winder Amber P, Opsasnick Lauren, Kim Kwang-Youn, Benavente Julia Yoshino, Wolf Michael, Ramirez-Zohfeld Vanessa

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Mar 16;22:100756. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100756. eCollection 2021 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100756
PMID:33869887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8040099/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remaining in one's own home and community is a priority for many older adults as they age. Decision-making and planning is critical to ensure successful aging-in-place (AIP), especially when individuals experience age-related changes such as cognitive decline. : We are testing how decision-making and planning for AIP is impacted by changes in older adults' cognition and function, chronic conditions, social influences, environmental factors and identifying the mediating/moderating interactions between factors. We will also assess whether decision-making and planning for AIP translates into timely adoption of plans and goal concordance between older adults and their surrogate/caregiver decision makers.

METHODS

We will conduct a longitudinal single-group interventional clinical trial of community-dwelling older adults who are enrolled in LitCog, (R01AG03611) and expose them to an online intervention, PlanYourLifespan.org, which facilitates decision-making and planning for AIP. Enrolled participants (n = 398) will complete interviews at baseline, one month, and every six months up to 42 months in conjunction with the LitCog study, where cognitive, social, functional, and health literacy data is collected. Additionally, we will collect data on decision-making, resource use, communication of plans, timing of plan implementation, and goal concordance.

PROJECTED OUTCOMES

Findings from this study may generate evidence on how age-related changes in older adults may affect decision-making and implementation in relation to AIP as well as the impact of social relationships and support. Ultimately these findings may help shape the design of programs and practices that may improve the lives of older adults and the capacity of institutions to adapt to societal aging and AIP.

摘要

背景

随着年龄增长,许多老年人优先选择留在自己家中和社区。决策和规划对于确保成功的就地养老(AIP)至关重要,尤其是当个体经历与年龄相关的变化,如认知衰退时。我们正在测试老年人认知与功能的变化、慢性病、社会影响、环境因素如何影响AIP的决策和规划,并确定各因素之间的中介/调节相互作用。我们还将评估AIP的决策和规划是否能转化为计划的及时采纳,以及老年人与其替代/照顾者决策者之间的目标一致性。

方法

我们将对参加LitCog(R01AG03611)的社区居住老年人进行一项纵向单组干预性临床试验,并让他们参与在线干预PlanYourLifespan.org,该干预有助于AIP的决策和规划。登记的参与者(n = 398)将在基线、1个月、每6个月直至42个月时结合LitCog研究完成访谈,在LitCog研究中收集认知、社会、功能和健康素养数据。此外,我们将收集关于决策、资源使用、计划沟通、计划实施时间和目标一致性的数据。

预期结果

本研究的结果可能会产生关于老年人与年龄相关的变化如何影响与AIP相关的决策和实施以及社会关系和支持的影响的证据。最终,这些发现可能有助于塑造项目和实践的设计,从而改善老年人的生活以及机构适应社会老龄化和AIP的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c69/8040099/e600391c1a09/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c69/8040099/88cb88ee3e6f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c69/8040099/e600391c1a09/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c69/8040099/88cb88ee3e6f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c69/8040099/e600391c1a09/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Rationale and study design for decision making & implementation of aging-in-place/long term care plans among older adults.老年人就地养老/长期护理计划决策与实施的基本原理及研究设计
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Mar 16;22:100756. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100756. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Aspects of cognition that impact aging-in-place and long-term care planning.影响就地养老和长期护理规划的认知方面。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2646-2652. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17927. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
3
Impact of Early Life Socioeconomic Status on Decision Making in Older Adults Without Dementia.早年社会经济地位对无痴呆老年成人决策的影响。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Jul-Aug;95:104432. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104432. Epub 2021 May 9.
4
Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced?丰富化对成人认知发展的影响:老年人的功能能力能否得到保持和增强?
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Oct;9(1):1-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
A logic of choice: Problematizing the documentary reality of Canadian aging in place policies.一种选择的逻辑:对加拿大就地养老政策的文献现实提出质疑。
J Aging Stud. 2019 Mar;48:40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
7
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: A Delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders.优先考虑支持和服务,以帮助老年人就地安享晚年:一项德尔菲研究,比较了家庭/朋友护理伙伴和医疗保健利益相关者的观点。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 9;16(11):e0259387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259387. eCollection 2021.
10
Defining Aging in Place: The Intersectionality of Space, Person, and Time.就地养老的定义:空间、人及时间的交叉性
Innov Aging. 2020 Aug 24;4(4):igaa036. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa036. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-medical barriers and facilitators of ageing in place: a cohort study in the Netherlands.就地养老的非医疗障碍与促进因素:荷兰的一项队列研究。
Eur J Ageing. 2025 May 30;22(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00859-9.
2
What Changed Your Mind? Influencers of Older Adults Changing Decisions About Aging-In-Place Versus Long-Term Care.是什么改变了你的想法?影响老年人改变居家养老与长期护理决策的因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19475.
3
Fluctuating decision making about aging-in-place/long term care planning among older adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Longitudinal Follow-Up of Long-Term Care Planning Using PlanYourLifespan.org.使用 PlanYourLifespan.org 进行长期护理规划的纵向随访。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 May;40(5):536-540. doi: 10.1177/0733464820943066. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
2
Helping Seniors Plan for Posthospital Discharge Needs Before a Hospitalization Occurs: Results from the Randomized Control Trial of PlanYourLifespan.org.在住院发生前帮助老年人规划出院后需求:PlanYourLifespan.org随机对照试验的结果。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Nov;12(11):911-917. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2798. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
PlanYourLifeSpan.org - an intervention to help seniors make choices for their fourth quarter of life: Results from the randomized clinical trial.
老年人对原地养老/长期护理规划的决策波动不定。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Dec;71(12):3938-3940. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18536. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
4
Subjective cognitive decline and missed aging-in-place/long-term care planning.主观认知衰退与错失就地养老/长期护理规划
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Oct;71(10):3314-3316. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18425. Epub 2023 May 26.
5
Improvement in self-efficacy among older adults aging-in-place during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间居家养老老年人自我效能感的改善。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Nov;70(11):3318-3321. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17946. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
6
Aspects of cognition that impact aging-in-place and long-term care planning.影响就地养老和长期护理规划的认知方面。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2646-2652. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17927. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
7
Aging-in-place preferences and institutionalization among Japanese older adults: a 7-year longitudinal study.日本老年人就地老化偏好与机构化:一项 7 年纵向研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02766-5.
8
The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Older Adults' Decision-Making Related to Health, and Health and Social Care Services in Daily Life-A Scoping Review.信息和通信技术(ICT)在老年人日常生活中与健康和健康及社会保健服务相关的决策中的作用:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):151. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010151.
PlanYourLifeSpan.org - 一项帮助老年人为人生第四季做出选择的干预措施:随机临床试验结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Nov;100(11):1996-2004. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.028. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
4
Caregivers and Families of Critically Ill Patients.重症患者的护理人员及家属
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 8;375(10):1000. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1608225.
5
Advanced life events (ALEs) that impede aging-in-place among seniors.阻碍老年人居家养老的重大生活事件。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 May-Jun;64:90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
6
Physician involvement in life transition planning: a survey of community-dwelling older adults.医生参与生活转变规划:对社区居住老年人的一项调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Jul 30;16:92. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0311-0.
7
Cognitive decline is associated with risk aversion and temporal discounting in older adults without dementia.认知能力下降与无痴呆症老年人的风险规避和时间贴现有关。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0121900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121900. eCollection 2015.
8
The future as a series of transitions: qualitative study of heart failure patients and their informal caregivers.作为一系列转变的未来:对心力衰竭患者及其非正式照料者的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Feb;30(2):176-82. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3085-5. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
9
Anxiety and stigma in dementia: a threat to aging in place.痴呆症中的焦虑和耻辱感:就地老化的威胁。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2014 Jun;49(2):213-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2014.02.008.
10
Family matters: effects of birth order, culture, and family dynamics on surrogate decision-making.家庭因素:出生顺序、文化和家庭动态对代孕决策的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Jan;62(1):175-82. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12610. Epub 2014 Jan 2.