• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高保真模拟持续时间和本科护生学习成果之间的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。

High-fidelity simulation duration and learning outcomes among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau SAR, China; Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Est. Repouso No. 35, R/C, Macau SAR, China.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep;116:105435. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105435. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105435
PMID:35728333
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the effects of different lengths of the three key steps (prebriefing, simulation, and debriefing) of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) on the knowledge and skills of undergraduate nursing students.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was conducted for Chinese and English publications from the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and two Chinese databases (Wanfang and CNKI) up to November 24, 2021.

REVIEW METHODS

Two independent raters screened the retrieved studies and extracted data based on a coding protocol from the studies that met the inclusion criteria. Data were synthesized using meta-analytic procedures based on a random-effect model and computing effect sizes by standard mean differences (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Forty-four studies were included, and 23 studies were analyzed. High-fidelity simulation (HFS) with debriefing of 10 min or less (SMD = 1.18), simulation of 15-20 min (SMD = 1.43), and debriefing of 11-30 min (SMD = 1.19) showed larger effect sizes for knowledge, while HFS with debriefing of >10 min (SMD = 0.91), simulation of 15 min or less (SMD = 0.89), and over 30 min of debriefing cultivation (SMD = 0.84) showed larger effect sizes for skill.

CONCLUSIONS

During the prebriefing, simulation, and debriefing, shorter sessions are more effective for improving knowledge in BSN students, whereas longer sessions are most effective for improving skills in BSN students. Nurse educators can schedule HFS to meet the expectations of learning outcomes based on the actual situation.

摘要

目的

探讨高保真模拟(HFS)三个关键步骤(预介绍、模拟、讨论)的不同时长对本科护理学生知识和技能的影响。

设计

系统回顾和荟萃分析。

资料来源

从 Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 以及两个中文数据库(万方和知网)系统地检索了 2021 年 11 月 24 日之前发表的中文和英文文献。

审查方法

两名独立的评估员根据纳入标准筛选检索到的研究,并根据研究的编码方案提取数据。使用基于随机效应模型的荟萃分析程序和计算标准均数差(SMD)的 95%置信区间(CI)来综合数据。

结果

共纳入 44 项研究,其中 23 项进行了分析。高保真模拟(HFS),讨论时间少于 10 分钟(SMD=1.18)、模拟时间 15-20 分钟(SMD=1.43)和讨论时间 11-30 分钟(SMD=1.19)对知识的影响较大,而讨论时间超过 10 分钟(SMD=0.91)、模拟时间 15 分钟或更短(SMD=0.89)和讨论时间超过 30 分钟(SMD=0.84)对技能的影响较大。

结论

在预介绍、模拟和讨论中,较短的时间对提高 BSN 学生的知识更有效,而较长的时间对提高 BSN 学生的技能最有效。护理教育者可以根据实际情况安排 HFS 以满足学习成果的期望。

相似文献

1
High-fidelity simulation duration and learning outcomes among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高保真模拟持续时间和本科护生学习成果之间的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep;116:105435. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105435. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
2
Impact of scenario validity and group size on learning outcomes in high-fidelity simulation: A systematics review and meta-analysis.情景有效性和小组规模对高保真模拟学习效果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Feb;121:105705. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105705. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
3
Effectiveness of simulation debriefing methods in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.模拟教学后反馈方法在护理教育中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Dec;107:105113. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105113. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
4
Effects of high-fidelity simulation teaching on nursing students' knowledge, professional skills and clinical ability: A meta-analysis and systematic review.高保真模拟教学对护理学生知识、专业技能和临床能力的影响:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Mar;60:103306. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103306. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
5
The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students' clinical reasoning-related skills: A systematic review.高保真模拟对本科护生临床推理相关技能的有效性:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Feb;121:105679. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105679. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Effects of simulation technology-based learning on nursing students' learning outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies.基于模拟技术的学习对护生学习成果的影响:实验研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Dec;107:105127. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105127. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
7
Effect of simulation on stress, anxiety, and self-confidence in nursing students: Systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.模拟对护生应激、焦虑和自信的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Sep;133:104282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104282. Epub 2022 May 24.
8
Stimulating ambulance specialist nurse students' ethical reflections by high-fidelity simulation.通过高仿真模拟激发急救专科护生的伦理思考
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Jun;32(4):1197-1209. doi: 10.1177/09697330241291162. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
9
Blended learning vs traditional teaching: The potential of a novel teaching strategy in nursing education - a systematic review and meta-analysis.混合式学习与传统教学:一种新型教学策略在护理教育中的潜力——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Aug;63:103354. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103354. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
10
Prebriefing for high-fidelity simulation in nursing education: A meta-analysis.护理教育中的高保真模拟前简报:一项荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Dec;119:105609. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105609. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Readiness for Practice Among Nursing College Graduates: A Cross-Sectional Correlation Study.护理专业本科毕业生的实践准备情况:一项横断面相关性研究。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Aug 25;11:23779608251371497. doi: 10.1177/23779608251371497. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
The impact of simulation on the development of critical thinking and reflection among nursing and medical students: a systematic review.模拟对护理和医学生批判性思维与反思能力发展的影响:一项系统综述。
Korean J Med Educ. 2025 Jun;37(2):187-202. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2025.334. Epub 2025 May 29.
3
Electronic Feedback Alone Versus Electronic Feedback Plus in-Person Debriefing for a Serious Game Designed to Teach Novice Anesthesiology Residents to Perform General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Randomized Controlled Trial.
针对一款旨在教授麻醉新手住院医师进行剖宫产全身麻醉的严肃游戏,单纯电子反馈与电子反馈加现场汇报的对比:随机对照试验
JMIR Serious Games. 2024 Nov 19;12:e59047. doi: 10.2196/59047.
4
Post-simulation debriefing as a stepping stone to self-reflection and increased awareness - a qualitative study.模拟后汇报作为自我反思和提高意识的垫脚石——一项定性研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Aug 13;9(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00306-2.
5
The effects of simulation-based education on undergraduate nursing students' competences: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.基于模拟的教育对本科护生能力的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 17;23(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02069-7.
6
Assessing satisfaction in simulation among nursing students: psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience - Italian Version scale.评估护理专业学生对模拟教学的满意度:模拟体验满意度量表-意大利语版的心理测量特性
BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 30;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01974-1.
7
Mock trial as a simulation strategy allowing undergraduate nursing students to experience evidence-based practice: A scoping-review.模拟审判作为一种模拟策略,使护理本科生能够体验循证实践:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 10;18(8):e0289789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289789. eCollection 2023.