Suppr超能文献

富白细胞富血小板纤维蛋白与先进富血小板纤维蛋白治疗牙龈退缩缺损的临床疗效比较评估:一项随机对照试验。

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin with Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, SRM Dental College, Chennai, India.

出版信息

Med Princ Pract. 2022;31(4):376-383. doi: 10.1159/000525560. Epub 2022 Jun 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this research was to determine and compare the clinical efficacy of leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of gingival recession defects.

METHODS

Systemically healthy subjects presenting with 30 Miller's class I or II gingival recession defects in maxillary anteriors and premolars, were treated with either CAF + L-PRF or CAF + A-PRF. Clinical parameters such as recession height (RH), width, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue height (KTH), and width of attached gingiva (WAG) were measured at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Gingival biotype was evaluated at baseline and 6 months post-surgery. Mean root coverage percentage (MRC%) was evaluated at 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Statistically significant reduction in mean RH was observed from baseline (2.53 ± 0.74 mm, 2.63 ± 0.82 mm) to 6 months (0.87 ± 0.83 mm, 0.53 ± 0.91 mm) in CAF + L-PRF and CAF + A-PRF groups, respectively. The MRC% achieved at 6 months was 67.20 ± 32.81 in the CAF + L-PRF group and 81.66 ± 28.21 in the CAF + A-PRF group. Statistically significant gain in CAL, WAG, and KTH was observed in both therapeutic groups (p < 0.05). Intergroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences among study parameters between groups at any time point (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this study, both L-PRF and A-PRF may be suggested as viable treatment options for the management of gingival recession in maxilla.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定和比较白细胞富血小板纤维蛋白(L-PRF)和先进的富血小板纤维蛋白(A-PRF)与冠向推进瓣(CAF)联合治疗牙龈退缩缺陷的临床疗效。

方法

系统地选择上颌前牙和前磨牙有 30 例 Miller Ⅰ类或Ⅱ类牙龈退缩缺陷的健康受试者,分别用 CAF+L-PRF 或 CAF+A-PRF 治疗。在基线、3 个月和 6 个月时测量临床参数,如退缩高度(RH)、宽度、探诊袋深度、临床附着水平(CAL)、角化组织高度(KTH)和附着龈宽度(WAG)。在基线和术后 6 个月时评估牙龈生物型。在 3 个月和 6 个月时评估平均根覆盖率百分比(MRC%)。

结果

CAF+L-PRF 和 CAF+A-PRF 组从基线(2.53±0.74mm,2.63±0.82mm)到 6 个月(0.87±0.83mm,0.53±0.91mm)时,平均 RH 显著降低。CAF+L-PRF 组的 MRC%在 6 个月时为 67.20±32.81,CAF+A-PRF 组为 81.66±28.21。在两个治疗组中,CAL、WAG 和 KTH 均有显著增加(p<0.05)。组间分析显示,在任何时间点,组间研究参数均无统计学差异(p>0.05)。

结论

根据本研究的结果,L-PRF 和 A-PRF 均可作为上颌牙龈退缩的可行治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/491e/9485915/8222327ccaad/mpp-0031-0376-g01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验