Comparing core-genome MLST with PFGE and MLST for cluster analysis of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

OBJECTIVES

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a prevalent pathogen contributing to hospital infections. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and core-genome MLST (cgMLST) are frequently used methods to illuminate the nosocomial transmission of CRAB. In this study, we compared the discriminatory power of the three typing methods.

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed by the broth microdilution and Vitek2 methods. PFGE, MLST and cgMLST were conducted to determine the clonality and phylogenetic relationship of the strains. Whole-genome sequence data were acquired by an Illumina HiSeq 2000, and cgMLST was analysed by the Ridom SeqSphere+ v.7.2.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 149 carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates had 15 different PFGE profiles (A-O type), and 73 of the isolates had related subtypes (A1 and A2), accounting for the majority of type A isolates. The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis based on the cgMLST genes grouped the same PFGE clonal pattern A into nine different clusters. ST_Pasteur grouped all the strains into ST2, whereas ST_Oxford grouped the PFGE clonal pattern A isolates into six STs. In addition, the gdhB allele in the ST_Oxford scheme had two copies in five strains, which complicated the ST_Oxford typing.

CONCLUSIONS

cgMLST was more discriminant than PFGE and MLST. CgMLST is the most suitable and comprehensive method for genotyping A. baumannii in surveillance and epidemiological research.