College of Management, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 22;12(1):10511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11877-3.
Under the background of the new development concept, compared with the absolute impacts, the relative impacts of climate change on agricultural growth deserve more attention. Based on the data from China for years 1991 and 2018, this paper uses historical fluctuations in temperature within cities to identify the heterogeneous effects on aggregate agricultural outcomes during farming and fallow periods. The results show that: first, as temperature rises reduce the economic growth rate of each agricultural sector, and the areas that are relatively vulnerable (i.e., areas where disposable income of farm households is below the sample mean) are more significantly affected by the negative impact of temperature rise; second, the impact of temperature rise on agricultural economic growth is mainly concentrated in the farming period, while the marginal damage of temperature rise is on a decreasing trend; third, the heterogeneous impact of temperature rise on agricultural economic growth during the agricultural fallow period is also not negligible. At the same time, its impact on agricultural economy is still in the primary stage, that is, its marginal damage tends to increase with the increase in temperature fluctuation. These results inform identifying the climate's role in agricultural development and provide a theoretical and operational perspective for further optimizing the adaptive policy systems. With wide coverage of adaptive technology, we should pay more attention to the even distribution of technological dividends and continuously improve the coping ability of vulnerable groups.
在新发展理念背景下,气候变化对农业增长的相对影响相较于绝对影响更值得关注。本文基于中国 1991 年至 2018 年的数据,利用城市内温度的历史波动来识别在农忙和休耕期内对农业总产出的异质影响。结果表明:第一,随着温度升高降低了各农业部门的经济增长率,且相对脆弱的地区(即农户可支配收入低于样本均值的地区)受到温度升高负面影响的冲击更大;第二,温度升高对农业经济增长的影响主要集中在农忙期,而温度升高的边际损害呈下降趋势;第三,温度升高对农业休耕期农业经济增长的异质影响也不可忽视。同时,其对农业经济的影响仍处于初级阶段,即其边际损害随着温度波动的增加而增加。这些结果有助于确定气候在农业发展中的作用,并为进一步优化适应性政策体系提供了理论和操作视角。随着适应性技术的广泛覆盖,我们应更加关注技术红利的公平分配,并不断提高弱势群体的应对能力。