• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球变暖加剧了全球经济不平等。

Global warming has increased global economic inequality.

机构信息

Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;

Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 14;116(20):9808-9813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816020116. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1816020116
PMID:31010922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6525504/
Abstract

Understanding the causes of economic inequality is critical for achieving equitable economic development. To investigate whether global warming has affected the recent evolution of inequality, we combine counterfactual historical temperature trajectories from a suite of global climate models with extensively replicated empirical evidence of the relationship between historical temperature fluctuations and economic growth. Together, these allow us to generate probabilistic country-level estimates of the influence of anthropogenic climate forcing on historical economic output. We find very high likelihood that anthropogenic climate forcing has increased economic inequality between countries. For example, per capita gross domestic product (GDP) has been reduced 17-31% at the poorest four deciles of the population-weighted country-level per capita GDP distribution, yielding a ratio between the top and bottom deciles that is 25% larger than in a world without global warming. As a result, although between-country inequality has decreased over the past half century, there is ∼90% likelihood that global warming has slowed that decrease. The primary driver is the parabolic relationship between temperature and economic growth, with warming increasing growth in cool countries and decreasing growth in warm countries. Although there is uncertainty in whether historical warming has benefited some temperate, rich countries, for most poor countries there is >90% likelihood that per capita GDP is lower today than if global warming had not occurred. Thus, our results show that, in addition to not sharing equally in the direct benefits of fossil fuel use, many poor countries have been significantly harmed by the warming arising from wealthy countries' energy consumption.

摘要

了解经济不平等的原因对于实现公平的经济发展至关重要。为了研究全球变暖是否影响了最近不平等的演变,我们结合了一系列全球气候模型的反事实历史温度轨迹,以及历史温度波动与经济增长之间关系的广泛复制的经验证据。这些使我们能够生成关于人为气候强迫对历史经济产出影响的概率国家层面的估计。我们非常有把握地认为,人为气候强迫增加了国家之间的经济不平等。例如,在人口加权的国家层面人均 GDP 分布的最贫穷的四个十分位数中,人均 GDP 减少了 17-31%,这使得贫富差距的比值比没有全球变暖的情况下大 25%。因此,尽管过去半个世纪以来国家间的不平等有所减少,但全球变暖很可能减缓了这种减少。主要驱动因素是温度与经济增长之间的抛物线关系,变暖会增加寒冷国家的增长,减少温暖国家的增长。尽管对于历史变暖是否使一些温带富裕国家受益存在不确定性,但对于大多数贫穷国家来说,全球变暖没有发生的情况下,今天的人均 GDP 低于过去的可能性大于 90%。因此,我们的研究结果表明,除了不能平等地分享化石燃料使用的直接好处外,许多贫穷国家还因富裕国家的能源消耗导致的变暖而受到严重损害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c27f/6525504/7918f9af10e0/pnas.1816020116fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c27f/6525504/f9476d4ec0dd/pnas.1816020116fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c27f/6525504/72944384ae10/pnas.1816020116fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c27f/6525504/2399ecf5341d/pnas.1816020116fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c27f/6525504/7918f9af10e0/pnas.1816020116fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c27f/6525504/f9476d4ec0dd/pnas.1816020116fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c27f/6525504/72944384ae10/pnas.1816020116fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c27f/6525504/2399ecf5341d/pnas.1816020116fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c27f/6525504/7918f9af10e0/pnas.1816020116fig04.jpg

相似文献

1
Global warming has increased global economic inequality.全球变暖加剧了全球经济不平等。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 14;116(20):9808-9813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816020116. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
2
Uncertain impacts on economic growth when stabilizing global temperatures at 1.5°C or 2°C warming.将全球气温稳定在升温1.5°C或2°C时对经济增长的影响尚不确定。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018 May 13;376(2119). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0460.
3
Large potential reduction in economic damages under UN mitigation targets.在联合国减排目标下,经济损失有很大的潜在减少。
Nature. 2018 May;557(7706):549-553. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0071-9. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
Climate change and economic growth: a heterogeneous panel data approach.气候变化与经济增长:基于异质面板数据的研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Aug;25(23):22725-22735. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2305-7. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production.全球温度对经济产量的非线性影响。
Nature. 2015 Nov 12;527(7577):235-9. doi: 10.1038/nature15725. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
6
The effect of carbon dioxide emission and the consumption of electrical energy, fossil fuel energy, and renewable energy, on economic performance: evidence from Pakistan.二氧化碳排放及电力、化石燃料和可再生能源消耗对经济绩效的影响:来自巴基斯坦的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(21):21760-21773. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05550-y. Epub 2019 May 27.
7
Approximate calculations of the net economic impact of global warming mitigation targets under heightened damage estimates.在提高损害估计的情况下,对全球变暖缓解目标的净经济影响进行近似计算。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239520. eCollection 2020.
8
Income Inequality, Economic Growth and Stroke Mortality in Brazil: Longitudinal and Regional Analysis 2002-2009.巴西的收入不平等、经济增长与中风死亡率:2002 - 2009年纵向与区域分析
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 9;10(9):e0137332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137332. eCollection 2015.
9
Globally unequal effect of extreme heat on economic growth.极端高温对经济增长的全球不平等影响。
Sci Adv. 2022 Oct 28;8(43):eadd3726. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add3726.
10
Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality.气候计量经济学模型表明,太阳地球工程将减少国家间的收入不平等。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 13;11(1):227. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13957-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Refining methods for attributing health impacts to climate change: a heat-mortality case study in Zürich.将健康影响归因于气候变化的细化方法:苏黎世的热死亡率案例研究
Clim Change. 2025;178(9):165. doi: 10.1007/s10584-025-04011-5. Epub 2025 Sep 10.
2
Assessing the Policy Gaps for Achieving China's Carbon Neutrality Target.评估实现中国碳中和目标的政策差距
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Sep 2;59(34):18124-18133. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c12478. Epub 2025 Aug 19.
3
Large reductions in tropical bird abundance attributable to heat extreme intensification.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic carbon cycle feedbacks may offset additional warming from natural feedbacks.经济碳循环反馈可能会抵消自然反馈带来的额外升温。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 15;116(3):759-764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805187115. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
2
Strengthened scientific support for the Endangerment Finding for atmospheric greenhouse gases.加强对大气温室气体危害认定的科学支持。
Science. 2019 Feb 8;363(6427). doi: 10.1126/science.aat5982. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
3
Large potential reduction in economic damages under UN mitigation targets.
热带地区鸟类数量因极端高温加剧而大幅减少。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02811-7.
4
The impact of social crises on nursing students' mental health: a cross-sectional study.社会危机对护生心理健康的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 7;24(1):1039. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03706-5.
5
Spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of apple carbon emissions in China, 1991-2020.1991 - 2020年中国苹果碳排放的时空演变特征
Sci Rep. 2025 May 27;15(1):18478. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02419-8.
6
Epidemiological insight into bacterial risk associated with flooded areas of city agglomeration (Wrocław, Poland 2024).对城市群洪水泛滥地区相关细菌风险的流行病学洞察(波兰弗罗茨瓦夫,2024年)
Sci Rep. 2025 May 25;15(1):18182. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03001-y.
7
Greenhouse gas emissions reduction potential by increasing aquatic food consumption in China.中国通过增加水生食物消费实现温室气体减排的潜力
NPJ Sci Food. 2025 May 24;9(1):85. doi: 10.1038/s41538-025-00457-0.
8
Urban and non-urban contributions to the social cost of carbon.城市和非城市地区对碳社会成本的贡献。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 6;16(1):4193. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59466-y.
9
Carbon majors and the scientific case for climate liability.碳巨头与气候责任的科学依据。
Nature. 2025 Apr;640(8060):893-901. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08751-3. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
10
Mitigation justice.缓解正义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 29;122(17):e2411231122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2411231122. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
在联合国减排目标下,经济损失有很大的潜在减少。
Nature. 2018 May;557(7706):549-553. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0071-9. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States.估算美国气候变化造成的经济损失。
Science. 2017 Jun 30;356(6345):1362-1369. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4369.
5
Quantifying the influence of global warming on unprecedented extreme climate events.量化全球变暖对史无前例的极端气候事件的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 9;114(19):4881-4886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618082114. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
6
Social and economic impacts of climate.气候的社会和经济影响。
Science. 2016 Sep 9;353(6304). doi: 10.1126/science.aad9837.
7
Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production.全球温度对经济产量的非线性影响。
Nature. 2015 Nov 12;527(7577):235-9. doi: 10.1038/nature15725. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
8
Inequality in the long run.长期不平等。
Science. 2014 May 23;344(6186):838-43. doi: 10.1126/science.1251936.
9
Geography and macroeconomics: new data and new findings.地理学与宏观经济学:新数据与新发现
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7;103(10):3510-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509842103. Epub 2006 Feb 10.