• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机工作者的人体工程学评估

Ergonomic evaluation of computer workers.

作者信息

Bersanetti Michelli Belotti, Gorla Camila, Turci Aline Mendonça

机构信息

Departamento de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade de Araraquara, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Med Trab. 2021 Dec 30;19(4):445-453. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2021-628. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.

DOI:10.47626/1679-4435-2021-628
PMID:35733544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9162287/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Information technologies have become indispensable in the office environment with a considerable increase in the use of computers. Musculoskeletal complaints in computer workers have a multifactorial etiology; therefore, an ergonomic investigation should be based on both self-reporting of symptoms and quantifiable observational methods.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate ergonomic and biomechanical characteristics of computer workers to identify the presence of symptoms and to assess the existence of a correlation between experts' observational assessment and workers' self-perception.

METHODS

Participants were approached by an observer responsible for screening of symptoms and demographic characteristics. Volunteers were then evaluated simultaneously by two blinded observers.

RESULTS

Seventy-one computer workers participated, and no significant differences were observed for duration of work on a computer between participants with and without pain. Interobserver reliability was good (0.93, 95%CI 0.88-0.96). No correlation was found between Maastricht Upper Extremity Questionnaire and Rapid Office Strain Assessment scores (p = 0.054/r = 0.230). There was no difference between participants with and without pain in the Rapid Office Strain Assessment (p = 0.931). In the Maastricht Upper Extremity Questionnaire assessment, there were differences in job demand (p = 0.004), complaints (p = 0.034), and total score (p = 0.044), with higher scores for asymptomatic participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that asymptomatic individuals are subject to higher job demands probably because they have not previously experienced significant pain. However, they have other complaints, such as stiffness, disability, weakness, edema, and paresthesia. Symptomatic individuals, in turn, have greater trouble in aspects such as reduced amount of time spent on work and performance of work requiring extra effort.

摘要

引言

随着计算机使用量的大幅增加,信息技术在办公环境中已变得不可或缺。计算机工作者的肌肉骨骼不适具有多因素病因;因此,人体工程学调查应基于症状的自我报告和可量化的观察方法。

目的

本研究旨在评估计算机工作者的人体工程学和生物力学特征,以确定症状的存在,并评估专家的观察评估与工作者自我认知之间的相关性。

方法

由一名负责筛查症状和人口统计学特征的观察员接触参与者。然后由两名不知情的观察员同时对志愿者进行评估。

结果

71名计算机工作者参与了研究,有疼痛和无疼痛的参与者在计算机上的工作时长未观察到显著差异。观察者间信度良好(0.93,95%CI 0.88 - 0.96)。马斯特里赫特上肢问卷得分与快速办公室劳损评估得分之间未发现相关性(p = 0.054/r = 0.230)。在快速办公室劳损评估中,有疼痛和无疼痛的参与者之间没有差异(p = 0.931)。在马斯特里赫特上肢问卷评估中,工作需求(p = 0.004)、主诉(p = 0.034)和总分(p = 0.044)存在差异,无症状参与者得分更高。

结论

结果表明,无症状个体可能因之前未经历过明显疼痛而面临更高的工作需求。然而,他们有其他主诉,如僵硬、功能障碍、虚弱、水肿和感觉异常。有症状的个体则在诸如工作时间减少和需要额外努力的工作表现等方面有更大困难。

相似文献

1
Ergonomic evaluation of computer workers.计算机工作者的人体工程学评估
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2021 Dec 30;19(4):445-453. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2021-628. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
2
Differences in ergonomic and workstation factors between computer office workers with and without reported musculoskeletal pain.有和没有报告肌肉骨骼疼痛的计算机办公人员在人体工程学和工作站因素方面的差异。
Work. 2017;57(4):563-572. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172582.
3
Ergonomic risk factors among computer office workers for complaints of arm, neck and shoulder and workstation evaluation.电脑办公人员的手臂、颈部和肩部投诉的人机工程学风险因素以及工作站评估。
Work. 2022;73(1):321-326. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211029.
4
Associations between musculoskeletal pain and work-related factors among public service sector computer workers in Kaunas County, Lithuania.立陶宛考纳斯县公共服务部门计算机工作者的肌肉骨骼疼痛与工作相关因素之间的关联。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Oct 7;17(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1281-7.
5
Ergonomic interventions for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck among office workers.预防办公室职员上肢和颈部工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病的工效学干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 23;10(10):CD008570. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008570.pub3.
6
Measurement properties of a self-report index of ergonomic exposures for use in an office work environment.用于办公室工作环境的人体工程学暴露自我报告指标的测量属性。
J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jan;44(1):73-81. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200201000-00012.
7
Workstyle: development of a measure of response to work in those with upper extremity pain.工作方式:开发一种针对上肢疼痛患者工作反应的测量方法。
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Jun;15(2):87-104. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-3420-0.
8
Effects of ergonomic intervention on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders among computer workers: a randomized controlled trial.人体工程学干预对计算机工作人员与工作相关的上肢肌肉骨骼疾病的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014 Jan;87(1):73-83. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0838-5. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
9
Workstyle and upper-extremity symptoms: a biobehavioral perspective.工作方式与上肢症状:一种生物行为学视角
J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Apr;47(4):352-61. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000158705.50563.4c.
10
Prevalence of complaints of arm, neck and shoulder among computer office workers and psychometric evaluation of a risk factor questionnaire.计算机办公人员手臂、颈部和肩部不适的患病率及危险因素问卷的心理测量评估
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Jul 14;8:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-68.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of arm, neck and shoulder complaints and scapular static malposition among computer users.电脑使用者手臂、颈部和肩部不适及肩胛骨静态位置异常的评估
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2019 Dec 1;17(4):465-472. doi: 10.5327/Z1679443520190329. eCollection 2019.
2
Rapid office strain assessment (ROSA): Cross cultural validity, reliability and structural validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version.快速办公人群压力评估(ROSA):巴西葡萄牙语版的跨文化有效性、可靠性和结构有效性。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Feb;75:143-154. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
3
Differences in ergonomic and workstation factors between computer office workers with and without reported musculoskeletal pain.有和没有报告肌肉骨骼疼痛的计算机办公人员在人体工程学和工作站因素方面的差异。
Work. 2017;57(4):563-572. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172582.
4
Associations between musculoskeletal pain and work-related factors among public service sector computer workers in Kaunas County, Lithuania.立陶宛考纳斯县公共服务部门计算机工作者的肌肉骨骼疼痛与工作相关因素之间的关联。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Oct 7;17(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1281-7.
5
Upper-extremity and neck disorders associated with keyboard and mouse use.与使用键盘和鼠标相关的上肢及颈部疾病。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;131:427-33. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62627-1.00022-6.
6
The Brazilian Portuguese version of the revised Maastricht Upper Extremity Questionnaire (MUEQ-Br revised): translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and structural validation.修订版马斯特里赫特上肢问卷的巴西葡萄牙语版本(修订版MUEQ-Br):翻译、跨文化调适、信度及结构效度
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 25;16:41. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0497-2.
7
Office work and complaints of the arms, neck and shoulders: the role of job characteristics, muscular tension and need for recovery.办公室工作与手臂、颈部和肩部的抱怨:工作特征、肌肉紧张和恢复需求的作用。
J Occup Health. 2012;54(4):323-30. doi: 10.1539/joh.11-0152-oa. Epub 2012 May 18.
8
Office workers' risk factors for the development of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies.办公室工作人员发生非特异性颈部疼痛的危险因素:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价。
Occup Environ Med. 2012 Sep;69(9):610-8. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100459. Epub 2012 May 12.
9
Development and evaluation of an office ergonomic risk checklist: ROSA--rapid office strain assessment.开发和评估办公环境人体工程学风险清单:ROSARapid Office Strain Assessment(快速办公压力评估)。
Appl Ergon. 2012 Jan;43(1):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 May 6.
10
Work-related complaints of arm, neck and shoulder among computer office workers in an Asian country: prevalence and validation of a risk-factor questionnaire.在一个亚洲国家,电脑办公人员手臂、颈部和肩部与工作相关的抱怨:危险因素调查问卷的流行率和有效性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Apr 4;12:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-68.