Sinno Solara, Najem Fadi, Dumas Georges, Abouchacra Kim Smith, Mallinson Art, Perrin Philippe
EA 3450 DevAH, Development, Adaptation and Handicap, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Laboratory for the Analysis of Posture, Equilibrium and Motor Function (LAPEM), University Hospital of Nancy, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Audiol Res. 2022 Jun 6;12(3):316-326. doi: 10.3390/audiolres12030033.
: The skull vibration-induced-nystagmus test (SVINT) is a noninvasive and effective screening tool for the function of the otolith and canal structures in children. It can instantaneously assess vestibular asymmetry. This study aimed to analyze the SVINT results of healthy children vs. children with hearing loss (HL) and to correlate it with sensory organization test (SOT) results as a functional balance evaluation tool. : This case-controlled study compared the results of SVINT to the results of the SOT of the computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) in a control group of 120 healthy normal-hearing children (i.e., NH group) vs. hearing loss (HL) group of 60 children, including 30 children with hearing aids (HAs) and 30 children with a unilateral cochlear implant (CI). The SVINT results were compared to the caloric test (CaT) and video head impulse test (vHIT) and associated with SOT scores. : Thirty-one children in the HL group had normal SVINT and normal SOT results. A total of 21 children in the HL group had SVINT-negative and abnormal results in the SOT (possibly due to bilateral vestibular loss (BVL)). Eight children in the HL group had positive SVINT and abnormal SOT results. However, none of the children had only positive SVINT with normal SOT findings. Moreover, 52% of children had a normal result on both the SOT and CaT, whereas 27% had abnormal results on both tests (17% bilateral weakness and 10% unilateral), and 22% had the only result of the SOT suggesting a functional abnormality. Similarly, when associating the result to vHIT, 51% had normal results on both tests, and 25% had abnormal results (13% bilateral and 12% unilateral weakness). : SVINT findings can be correlated with SOT findings in the case of the unilateral vestibular lesion (UVL), which adds a diagnostic value in these pediatric cases but may differ in the case of the bilateral vestibular lesion (BVL). However, SVINT findings need to be cautiously interpreted in light of other test findings such as the SOT, CaT, and vHIT.
颅骨振动诱发眼震试验(SVINT)是一种用于评估儿童耳石和半规管结构功能的无创且有效的筛查工具。它能即时评估前庭不对称性。本研究旨在分析健康儿童与听力损失(HL)儿童的SVINT结果,并将其与作为功能平衡评估工具的感觉统合测试(SOT)结果相关联。 : 本病例对照研究将120名听力正常的健康儿童(即NH组)与60名听力损失(HL)儿童(包括30名佩戴助听器(HA)的儿童和30名单侧人工耳蜗植入(CI)的儿童)的SVINT结果与计算机动态姿势描记术(CDP)的SOT结果进行了比较。将SVINT结果与冷热试验(CaT)和视频头脉冲试验(vHIT)进行比较,并与SOT分数相关联。 : HL组中有31名儿童的SVINT和SOT结果正常。HL组中共有21名儿童的SVINT为阴性且SOT结果异常(可能由于双侧前庭丧失(BVL))。HL组中有8名儿童的SVINT为阳性且SOT结果异常。然而,没有儿童仅SVINT为阳性而SOT结果正常。此外,52%的儿童SOT和CaT结果均正常,而27%的儿童两项测试结果均异常(17%为双侧减弱,10%为单侧减弱),22%的儿童仅SOT结果提示功能异常。同样,当将结果与vHIT相关联时,51%的儿童两项测试结果均正常,25%的儿童结果异常(13%为双侧减弱和12%为单侧减弱)。 : 在单侧前庭病变(UVL)的情况下,SVINT结果可与SOT结果相关联,这在这些儿科病例中增加了诊断价值,但在双侧前庭病变(BVL)的情况下可能有所不同。然而,鉴于其他测试结果,如SOT、CaT和vHIT,需要谨慎解释SVINT结果。