School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Austin Regional Campus, Austin, TX, USA.
Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Nov 12;24(12):1994-2002. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac150.
Communities with more people of color and economically disadvantaged residents are disproportionately exposed to tobacco marketing from tobacco companies. This study examined if banning tobacco retail outlets (TROs) within 1000 ft of schools would reduce these marketing disparities through a greater reduction in the amount of tobacco advertising around schools in these communities.
Data from objectively audited advertisement data from 106 convenience stores and gas stations around 42 middle and high schools located in the four major metropolitan areas of Texas were linked with schools' enrollment data. ArcGIS (Aeronautical Reconnaissance Coverage Geographic Information System) was used to simulate a 1000-ft ban of tobacco sales around the schools. Independent sample T-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to test mean differences where appropriate.
Schools with a higher enrollment of Hispanic/Latino (mean = 171.6, SD = 96.9) and economically disadvantaged students (mean = 168.9, SD = 102.3) were surrounded with significantly greater advertising at TROs than schools with lower enrollment of these groups (mean = 82.8, SD = 49.1 and mean = 89.2, SD = 50.6, respectively). A simulated 1000 ft ban of TROs around schools led to greater advertising reduction around schools with a higher enrollment of Hispanic/Latino students (13.3%-29.4% reductions) in comparison to schools with lower Hispanic/Latino student enrollment. However, the more economically disadvantaged schools had a smaller reduction in the number of advertisements (5.9%-21.9% reductions) in comparison to schools with less economically disadvantaged students.
The implementation of a ban of tobacco sales at TROs within 1000 ft of schools is one policy approach to reduce youth exposure to tobacco marketing, particularly among students of color.
Tobacco retail outlets (TROs) around schools with a higher enrollment of Hispanic/Latino and economically disadvantaged students had significantly more tobacco advertisements in comparison to schools with lower enrollment of these student groups. A simulated ban of TROs within 1000 ft of schools led to greater advertising reduction around schools with a higher enrollment of Hispanic/Latino students. For schools with more economically disadvantaged students, the ban led to a smaller reduction in advertisements in comparison to schools with less economically disadvantaged students. This proposed place-based strategy could be a successful means to reduce tobacco advertising and marketing disparity among communities of color.
拥有更多有色人种和经济贫困居民的社区不成比例地受到烟草公司的烟草营销活动的影响。本研究通过在这些社区的学校周围减少更多的烟草广告,检验了在距离学校 1000 英尺范围内禁止烟草零售店(TRO)是否会减少这些营销差距。
从位于德克萨斯州四大都会区的 42 所中学和高中周围的 106 家便利店和加油站的客观审核广告数据中收集数据,并将这些数据与学校的入学数据相关联。ArcGIS(航空侦察覆盖地理信息系统)用于模拟学校周围 1000 英尺范围内的烟草销售禁令。在适当的情况下,使用独立样本 T 检验和曼-惠特尼 U 检验来检验均值差异。
具有较高西班牙裔/拉丁裔(均值=171.6,标准差=96.9)和经济贫困学生(均值=168.9,标准差=102.3)入学率的学校,在 TRO 周围的广告数量明显多于入学率较低的学校(分别为均值=82.8,标准差=49.1 和均值=89.2,标准差=50.6)。在学校周围模拟实施 1000 英尺 TRO 禁令,导致具有较高西班牙裔/拉丁裔学生入学率的学校周围的广告减少幅度更大(减少 13.3%-29.4%),而具有较低西班牙裔/拉丁裔学生入学率的学校则减少幅度较小(减少 5.9%-21.9%)。然而,与经济条件较差的学生相比,经济条件较差的学校的广告数量减少幅度较小(减少 5.9%-21.9%)。
在距离学校 1000 英尺范围内禁止烟草销售是减少青少年接触烟草营销的一种政策方法,特别是针对有色人种的青少年。
与入学率较低的学生群体相比,学校周围具有较高西班牙裔/拉丁裔和经济贫困学生入学率的 TRO 有更多的烟草广告。在学校周围模拟实施 1000 英尺 TRO 禁令,导致具有较高西班牙裔/拉丁裔学生入学率的学校周围的广告减少幅度更大。对于经济条件较差的学生来说,与经济条件较差的学生相比,禁令导致广告数量的减少幅度较小。这种基于地点的策略可能是减少有色人种社区烟草广告和营销差距的一种成功手段。