Rose Shyanika W, Barker Dianne C, D'Angelo Heather, Khan Tamkeen, Huang Jidong, Chaloupka Frank J, Ribisl Kurt M
Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Barker Bi-Coastal Health Consultants, Inc., Calabasas, California, USA.
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii10-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051461.
Since their introduction in 2007, electronic cigarette ('e-cigarette') awareness and use has grown rapidly. Little is known about variation in e-cigarette availability across areas with different levels of tobacco taxes and smoke-free air policies. This paper looks at US retail availability of e-cigarettes and factors at the store, neighbourhood and policy levels associated with it.
In-person store audit data collected in 2012 came from two national samples of tobacco retailers in the contiguous US. Study 1 collected data from a nationally representative sample of tobacco retailers (n=2165). Study 2 collected data from tobacco retailers located in school enrolment zones for nationally representative samples of 8th, 10th and 12th grade public school students (n=2526).
In 2012, e-cigarette retail availability was 34% in study 1 and 31% in study 2. Tobacco, pharmacy and gas/convenience stores were more likely to sell e-cigarettes than beer/wine/liquor stores. Retail availability of e-cigarettes was more likely in neighbourhoods with higher median household income (study 1), and lower percent of African-American (studies 1 and 2) and Hispanic residents (study 2). Price of traditional cigarettes was inversely related to e-cigarette availability. Stores in states with an American Lung Association Smoke-Free Air grade of F (study 1) or D (study 2) compared with A had increased likelihood of having e-cigarettes.
Currently, e-cigarette availability appears more likely in areas with weak tax and smoke-free air policies. Given the substantial availability of e-cigarettes at tobacco retailers nationwide, states and localities should monitor the sales and marketing of e-cigarettes at point of sale (POS).
自2007年电子烟问世以来,其知晓度和使用率迅速增长。对于不同烟草税水平和无烟空气政策地区电子烟可得性的差异,人们知之甚少。本文研究了美国电子烟在零售场所的可得性以及与之相关的商店、社区和政策层面的因素。
2012年收集的实体店审计数据来自美国本土两个全国性烟草零售商样本。研究1从具有全国代表性的烟草零售商样本(n = 2165)中收集数据。研究2从位于8年级、10年级和12年级公立学校学生全国代表性样本的入学区域内的烟草零售商处收集数据(n = 2526)。
2012年,研究1中电子烟的零售可得率为34%,研究2中为31%。烟草店、药店和加油站/便利店比啤酒/葡萄酒/酒类商店更有可能销售电子烟。在家庭收入中位数较高的社区(研究1),以及非裔美国人比例较低(研究1和2)和西班牙裔居民比例较低的社区(研究2),电子烟的零售可得性更高。传统香烟的价格与电子烟的可得性呈负相关。与空气质量等级为A的州相比,美国肺脏协会无烟空气等级为F(研究1)或D(研究2)的州的商店销售电子烟的可能性增加。
目前,在烟草税政策薄弱和无烟空气政策薄弱的地区,电子烟的可得性似乎更高。鉴于全国烟草零售商处电子烟的大量可得性,各州和地方应在销售点(POS)监测电子烟的销售和营销情况。