• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猪舍围栏尺寸与设计、垫料、生根材料及环境因素对育肥猪舍围栏和猪只清洁度及空气质量的影响

The Effects of Pen Size and Design, Bedding, Rooting Material and Ambient Factors on Pen and Pig Cleanliness and Air Quality in Fattening Pig Houses.

作者信息

Ocepek Marko, Andersen Inger Lise

机构信息

Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Aas, Norway.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 19;12(12):1580. doi: 10.3390/ani12121580.

DOI:10.3390/ani12121580
PMID:35739916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9219434/
Abstract

There are several environmental and ambient factors that can affect pig eliminative behaviour. The aim of this survey was to investigate factors related to the physical and ambient environment that have the strongest effects on pig and pen cleanliness and ammonia concentration. Data were collected from 87 pig farms and analysed using mixed (ammonia concentration) or generalized linear (pen and pig cleanliness) model in SAS. The pen was cleaner when pen partitions were open compared to closed (p = 0.010) and increased with increasing amount of litter (p = 0.002), using straw (p = 0.002) as rooting material. Pig cleanliness was higher when pen partitions in the eliminative area were open compared to closed (p = 0.007) and increased with increasing space per pig in the resting area (p < 0.001), with decreasing temperature (p < 0.001), and lowering of air velocity (p = 0.003). Other factors that increased cleanliness was using straw as rooting material (p = 0.028) and increasing amount of litter in the resting area (p = 0.002). Ammonia concentration was reduced with increasing floor space in the eliminative area (p < 0.001) and increasing amount of litter (p = 0.006). Our results pinpoint physical and ambient conditions affecting pen and pig cleanliness and air quality.

摘要

有几个环境和周边因素会影响猪的排泄行为。本次调查的目的是研究与物理和周边环境相关的、对猪和猪舍清洁度以及氨气浓度影响最大的因素。从87个猪场收集了数据,并在SAS中使用混合模型(氨气浓度)或广义线性模型(猪舍和猪的清洁度)进行分析。与封闭的猪舍隔板相比,开放的猪舍隔板使猪舍更清洁(p = 0.010),并且随着垫料量的增加而提高(p = 0.002),使用稻草作为拱掘材料时也是如此(p = 0.002)。与封闭的排泄区猪舍隔板相比,开放的排泄区猪舍隔板使猪的清洁度更高(p = 0.007),并且随着休息区每头猪空间的增加(p < 0.001)、温度的降低(p < 0.001)以及风速的降低(p = 0.003)而提高。其他提高清洁度的因素包括使用稻草作为拱掘材料(p = 0.028)以及增加休息区的垫料量(p = 0.002)。随着排泄区占地面积的增加(p < 0.001)和垫料量的增加(p = 0.006),氨气浓度降低。我们的结果明确了影响猪舍和猪的清洁度以及空气质量的物理和周边条件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8979/9219434/2484720dc42f/animals-12-01580-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8979/9219434/40e9f9c481ef/animals-12-01580-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8979/9219434/1359d7669b6e/animals-12-01580-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8979/9219434/34335a47ccbb/animals-12-01580-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8979/9219434/ed4169bd3706/animals-12-01580-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8979/9219434/2484720dc42f/animals-12-01580-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8979/9219434/40e9f9c481ef/animals-12-01580-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8979/9219434/1359d7669b6e/animals-12-01580-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8979/9219434/34335a47ccbb/animals-12-01580-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8979/9219434/ed4169bd3706/animals-12-01580-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8979/9219434/2484720dc42f/animals-12-01580-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effects of Pen Size and Design, Bedding, Rooting Material and Ambient Factors on Pen and Pig Cleanliness and Air Quality in Fattening Pig Houses.猪舍围栏尺寸与设计、垫料、生根材料及环境因素对育肥猪舍围栏和猪只清洁度及空气质量的影响
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 19;12(12):1580. doi: 10.3390/ani12121580.
2
Impact of amount of straw on pig and pen hygiene in partly slatted flooring systems.部分条板地板系统中垫料量对猪只和猪栏卫生的影响。
BMC Vet Res. 2020 Oct 7;16(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02594-y.
3
Gaseous emissions during the fattening of pigs kept either on fully slatted floors or on straw flow.在全漏缝地板或垫料饲养的育肥猪饲养期间的气体排放。
Animal. 2007 Nov;1(10):1515-23. doi: 10.1017/S1751731107000845.
4
Review: Concrete outdoor runs for organic growing-finishing pigs - a legislative, ethological and environmental perspective.综述:从立法、行为学和环境角度看有机育肥猪的室外混凝土畜栏
Animal. 2022 Jan;16(1):100435. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100435. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
5
Provision of straw by a foraging tower -effect on tail biting in weaners and fattening pigs.通过采食塔提供稻草——对断奶仔猪和育肥猪咬尾行为的影响
Porcine Health Manag. 2017 Mar 16;3:4. doi: 10.1186/s40813-017-0052-7. eCollection 2017.
6
The effect of long or chopped straw on pig behaviour.长秸秆或切碎秸秆对猪行为的影响。
Animal. 2015 May;9(5):862-70. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114003024. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
7
Factors affecting excretory behavior of pigs.影响猪排泄行为的因素。
J Anim Sci. 1994 Jun;72(6):1455-60. doi: 10.2527/1994.7261455x.
8
Pen Fouling in Finisher Pigs: Changes in the Lying Pattern and Pen Temperature Prior to Fouling.育肥猪的栏舍污染:污染发生前躺卧模式和栏舍温度的变化
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Apr 16;6:118. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00118. eCollection 2019.
9
Evaluating the effects of bedding materials and elevated platforms on contact dermatitis and plumage cleanliness of commercial broilers and on litter condition in broiler houses.评估垫料和高架平台对商品肉鸡接触性皮炎和羽毛清洁度以及鸡舍垫料状况的影响。
Br Poult Sci. 2017 Oct;58(5):480-489. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2017.1340588. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
10
Effect of pen design on tail biting and tail-directed behaviour of finishing pigs with intact tails.尾巴完整的育肥猪的钢笔设计对咬尾和针对尾巴行为的影响。
Animal. 2020 May;14(5):1034-1042. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119002805. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Seven Measures to Reduce Tail Biting Lesions in Fattening Pigs.七种减少育肥猪咬尾损伤措施的成本效益分析
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Sep 7;8:682330. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.682330. eCollection 2021.
2
Soiling of Pig Pens: A Review of Eliminative Behaviour.猪舍的粪便污染:排泄行为综述
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 3;10(11):2025. doi: 10.3390/ani10112025.
3
Life cycle assessment of segregating fattening pig urine and feces compared to conventional liquid manure management.与传统液态粪肥管理相比,肥育猪尿液和粪便分离的生命周期评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Feb 5;47(3):1589-97. doi: 10.1021/es302951a. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
4
The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing.五种不同生产体系中生长猪的福利:饲养和饲养环境评估。
Animal. 2012 Apr;6(4):656-67. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001868.
5
Temperature and body weight affect fouling of pig pens.温度和体重会影响猪圈的污垢情况。
J Anim Sci. 2006 Aug;84(8):2224-31. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-521.
6
Factors affecting excretory behavior of pigs.影响猪排泄行为的因素。
J Anim Sci. 1994 Jun;72(6):1455-60. doi: 10.2527/1994.7261455x.
7
Quantitative assessment of aerial ammonia toxicity to the nasal mucosa by use of the nasal lavage method in pigs.采用鼻腔灌洗法对猪鼻腔黏膜进行空气中氨毒性的定量评估。
Am J Vet Res. 1994 Sep;55(9):1335-40.
8
The identification of behavioural key features and their incorporation into a housing design for pigs.确定行为关键特征并将其纳入猪的饲养设计中。
Ann Rech Vet. 1984;15(2):287-99.