• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国血液透析患者慢性病护理患者评估量表(PACIC)的心理测量特性及其对健康结局的影响

Psychometric Properties and Effects on Health Outcomes of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) in Korean Hemodialysis Patients.

作者信息

Seo Ae-Rim, Kim Bo-Kyoung, Park Ki-Soo

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Institute of Health Science, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52727, Korea.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;10(6):1149. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061149.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare10061149
PMID:35742200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9223042/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The satisfaction of patients receiving integrated care with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is widely advocated and patients with ESRD have special health needs, but few studies have investigated whether integrated care was associated with health outcomes. Our aims were to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean-translated patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) in patients with ESRD, and to evaluate whether PACIC evaluated by patients was associated with health outcomes.

METHODS

ESRD patients on hemodialysis (n = 172) at 2 dialysis centers. Data quality, internal consistency and correlation between items and scales were assessed. To test the external validity, the association between PACIC and the health behaviour and outcomes of hemodialysis patients was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean score of the PACIC items was 3.0. The item-scale correlation (0.67-0.85) and test-retest correlation (0.72-0.82) regarding scales for internal consistency showed excellent consistency. Total PACIC score was significantly associated with dietary self-efficacy (β = 0.22) and serum potassium (Exp(B) = 1.65). Higher overall PACIC score was significantly associated with higher physical health status (β = 3.52).

CONCLUSIONS

The Korean-translated PACIC questionnaire is a tool with reliability and validity. Comprehensive treatment strategies for ESRD patients may improve their health behaviors and outcomes.

摘要

背景

终末期肾病(ESRD)患者接受综合护理的满意度得到广泛提倡,且ESRD患者有特殊的健康需求,但很少有研究调查综合护理是否与健康结局相关。我们的目的是评估韩国翻译版慢性病护理患者评估量表(PACIC)在ESRD患者中的心理测量特性,并评估患者评估的PACIC是否与健康结局相关。

方法

选取2个透析中心接受血液透析的172例ESRD患者。评估数据质量、内部一致性以及各条目与量表之间的相关性。为检验外部效度,分析PACIC与血液透析患者健康行为及结局之间的关联。

结果

PACIC各条目的平均得分为3.0。内部一致性量表的条目-量表相关性(0.67 - 0.85)和重测相关性(0.72 - 0.82)显示出极佳的一致性。PACIC总分与饮食自我效能感显著相关(β = 0.22),与血清钾也显著相关(Exp(B)=1.65)。PACIC总体得分越高,与更高的身体健康状况显著相关(β = 3.52)。

结论

韩国翻译版PACIC问卷是一种具有信效度的工具。针对ESRD患者的综合治疗策略可能会改善他们的健康行为和结局。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties and Effects on Health Outcomes of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) in Korean Hemodialysis Patients.韩国血液透析患者慢性病护理患者评估量表(PACIC)的心理测量特性及其对健康结局的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;10(6):1149. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061149.
2
Patients' assessment of chronic illness care: a validation study among patients with type 2 diabetes in Finland.患者对慢性病护理的评估:芬兰2型糖尿病患者的一项验证性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3206-7.
3
Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care measure (PACIC-5A) among patients with obesity.肥胖患者慢性病照护评估量表(PACIC - 5A)的心理测量学特性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 23;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3871-1.
4
Reliability and validity of the Greek translation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care + (PACIC-PLUS GR) survey.希腊语翻译的患者评估慢性病护理+(PACIC-PLUS-GR)调查的可靠性和有效性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 25;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01192-z.
5
Adaptation and psychometric properties of the PACIC short form.PACIC 简短形式的适应性和心理计量学特性。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Feb 1;18(2):e55-60.
6
Psychometric evaluation of patient assessment of chronic illness care among Korean cancer survivors.韩国癌症幸存者慢性病照顾患者评估量表的心理计量学评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0256119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256119. eCollection 2021.
7
Validity and reliability of the patient assessment on chronic illness care (PACIC) questionnaire: the Malay version.慢性病照护患者评估问卷(PACIC)的效度与信度:马来语版本
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0807-5.
8
Adaptation and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care in United States community pharmacies.美国社区药店中慢性病护理的患者评估的适应和验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07697-w.
9
Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment Of Chronic Illness Care measure: acceptability, reliability and validity in United Kingdom patients with long-term conditions.患者评估慢性疾病护理量表的心理测量特性:英国长期疾病患者的可接受性、信度和效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 31;12:293. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-293.
10
Factorial validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and PACIC short version (PACIC-S) among cardiovascular disease patients in the Netherlands.在荷兰心血管疾病患者中对慢性病患者评估慢性病照护(PACIC)及其简短版(PACIC-S)进行析因验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Aug 31;10:104. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-104.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Its Influence on Patient Compliance With Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study.患者评估慢性疾病护理 (PACIC) 及其对高血压患者依从性的影响:一项横断面研究。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241277445. doi: 10.1177/00469580241277445.
2
Content validity of patient-reported measures evaluating experiences of the quality of transitions in healthcare settings-a scoping review.评估患者在医疗保健环境中经历的过渡质量的报告测量的内容效度:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11298-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Management of Non-communicable Chronic Diseases in Primary Healthcare Centres in The Saudi Health Care System.改善沙特医疗保健系统中初级医疗保健中心的非传染性慢性病管理
Health Serv Insights. 2022 Mar 23;15:11786329221088694. doi: 10.1177/11786329221088694. eCollection 2022.
2
Association between Satisfaction with Dialysis Treatment and Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study.透析治疗满意度与生活质量的关系:一项横断面研究。
Blood Purif. 2021;50(2):188-195. doi: 10.1159/000509787. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
3
Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家慢性肾脏病负担,1990-2017 年:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):709-733. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
4
Identifying Needs for Self-management Interventions for Adults With CKD and Their Caregivers: A Qualitative Study.识别慢性肾脏病患者及其照顾者自我管理干预需求的定性研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Oct;74(4):474-482. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
5
Patients' assessment of chronic illness care: a validation study among patients with type 2 diabetes in Finland.患者对慢性病护理的评估:芬兰2型糖尿病患者的一项验证性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3206-7.
6
Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) in Type 2 Diabetes: A Longitudinal Study.2型糖尿病患者慢性病照护评估(PACIC):一项纵向研究
Eval Health Prof. 2016 Jun;39(2):185-203. doi: 10.1177/0163278714556674. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
7
Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence.辅导和指导患者决策辅助工具:理论和实证证据的回顾。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S11. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
8
Effects of self-management support on structure, process, and outcomes among vulnerable patients with diabetes: a three-arm practical clinical trial.自我管理支持对糖尿病弱势患者的结构、过程和结局的影响:一项三臂实用性临床试验。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Apr;32(4):559-66. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0787. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
9
The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire in The Netherlands: a validation study in rural general practice.荷兰的患者慢性病护理评估(PACIC)问卷:一项农村全科医疗中的效度研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 1;8:182. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-182.
10
German diabetes disease management programs are appropriate for restructuring care according to the chronic care model: an evaluation with the patient assessment of chronic illness care instrument.德国糖尿病疾病管理项目适用于根据慢性病护理模式进行护理重组:使用慢性病护理患者评估工具进行的一项评估
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jun;31(6):1150-4. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2104. Epub 2008 Feb 25.