• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种患者决策辅助工具,以支持复发性高级别胶质瘤患者的共同决策。

Development of a Patient Decision Aid to Support Shared Decision Making for Patients with Recurrent High-Grade Glioma.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Kloevervaenget 47, Indgang 44, 46, 1. sal, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark.

Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsloews Vej 19, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 16;19(12):7396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127396.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19127396
PMID:35742644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9223526/
Abstract

When high-grade gliomas recur, patients, their families, and clinicians face difficult medical decisions. There is no curable treatment, and the treatment options all come with a risk of complications and adverse effects. The patients are often cognitively affected, and they need tailored decision support. The objective of this study was to develop a patient decision aid (PtDA) targeted at patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. Based on existing knowledge and the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, the PtDA was developed through an iterative process. The PtDA was alpha-tested by potential users to assess its acceptability and usability. The development team comprised three clinicians, two patients, two family members, and a researcher. The fifth version of the PtDA was submitted to the alpha test. Eleven patients, nine family members, and eleven clinicians assessed the PtDA and found it acceptable. Three changes were made during the alpha test. Most participants perceived the PtDA to prepare patients for decision making and improve consultations. The involvement of potential users was emphasized during the development and alpha test process. The PtDA was assessed as useful and acceptable by patients, family members, and clinicians in the decision-making situation of recurrent high-grade glioma.

摘要

当高级别胶质瘤复发时,患者、家属和临床医生都会面临艰难的医疗决策。目前尚无治愈方法,且所有治疗方案都伴随着并发症和不良反应的风险。患者通常存在认知障碍,需要量身定制的决策支持。本研究旨在开发一种针对复发性高级别胶质瘤患者的患者决策辅助工具(PtDA)。基于现有知识和国际患者决策辅助工具标准,通过迭代过程开发了 PtDA。通过潜在用户的α测试评估其可接受性和可用性。开发团队由三名临床医生、两名患者、两名家属和一名研究人员组成。PtDA 的第五版提交了α测试。11 名患者、9 名家属和 11 名临床医生评估了 PtDA,并认为其可以接受。在α测试期间进行了三项更改。大多数参与者认为 PtDA 可以帮助患者做好决策准备并改善咨询。在开发和α测试过程中强调了潜在用户的参与。PtDA 在复发性高级别胶质瘤的决策情况下被患者、家属和临床医生评估为有用且可接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c57/9223526/7d0b5e11c337/ijerph-19-07396-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c57/9223526/746f33dcc744/ijerph-19-07396-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c57/9223526/e2b25c52dc4d/ijerph-19-07396-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c57/9223526/7d0b5e11c337/ijerph-19-07396-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c57/9223526/746f33dcc744/ijerph-19-07396-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c57/9223526/e2b25c52dc4d/ijerph-19-07396-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c57/9223526/7d0b5e11c337/ijerph-19-07396-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a Patient Decision Aid to Support Shared Decision Making for Patients with Recurrent High-Grade Glioma.开发一种患者决策辅助工具,以支持复发性高级别胶质瘤患者的共同决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 16;19(12):7396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127396.
2
Development of an online patient decision aid for kidney failure treatment modality decisions.开发一种在线患者决策辅助工具,用于治疗肾衰竭治疗方式的决策。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Jul 6;23(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02853-0.
3
The impact of a patient decision aid on shared decision-making behaviour in oncology care and pulmonary medicine-A field study based on real-life observations.患者决策辅助工具对肿瘤学和肺病学护理中共同决策行为的影响-基于真实观察的现场研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1121-1130. doi: 10.1111/jep.13196. Epub 2019 May 29.
4
Evaluation of a patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.一种用于启动改善病情抗风湿药物的患者决策辅助工具的评估
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Oct 28;18(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1138-3.
5
Development and usability testing of a patient decision aid for newly diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis patients.新发复发型多发性硬化症患者决策辅助工具的开发与可用性测试
BMC Neurol. 2019 Jul 20;19(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1382-7.
6
A 'combined framework' approach to developing a patient decision aid: the PANDAs model.一种用于开发患者决策辅助工具的“综合框架”方法:熊猫模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 24;14:503. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0503-7.
7
Shared decision making when patients consider surgery for lumbar herniated disc: development and test of a patient decision aid.当患者考虑接受腰椎间盘突出症手术时的共同决策:患者决策辅助工具的制定和测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Oct 4;19(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0906-9.
8
Development of a web-based patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs using user-centred design methods.使用以用户为中心的设计方法开发一种基于网络的患者决策辅助工具,用于启动改善病情抗风湿药物治疗。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0433-5.
9
'A good decision is the one that feels right for me': Codesign with patients to inform theoretical underpinning of a decision aid website.“一个好的决策是对我来说感觉正确的决策”:与患者共同设计以提供决策辅助网站的理论基础。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13844. doi: 10.1111/hex.13844. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
10
Supporting Shared Decision-making About Surveillance After Breast Cancer With Personalized Recurrence Risk Calculations: Development of a Patient Decision Aid Using the International Patient Decision AIDS Standards Development Process in Combination With a Mixed Methods Design.通过个性化复发风险计算支持乳腺癌术后监测的共同决策:结合国际患者决策辅助工具标准制定流程和混合方法设计开发患者决策辅助工具
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Nov 14;8(4):e38088. doi: 10.2196/38088.

引用本文的文献

1
From Paper to Pixels: Digital Transition of a Patient Decision Aid-A Pilot Study.从纸质到电子:患者决策辅助工具的数字化转型——一项试点研究
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024 Dec 24;3(1):100190. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.100190. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Shared decision-making in neuro-oncology: Existing practices and future steps.神经肿瘤学中的共同决策:现有实践与未来步骤。
Neurooncol Pract. 2025 Jan 10;12(2):179-180. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaf005. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Large language models as decision aids in neuro-oncology: a review of shared decision-making applications.

本文引用的文献

1
Decisional needs of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma and their families.复发性高级别胶质瘤患者及其家属的决策需求。
Neurooncol Pract. 2022 Jun 11;9(5):402-410. doi: 10.1093/nop/npac046. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
The European Code of Cancer Practice.欧洲癌症实践准则。
J Cancer Policy. 2021 Jun;28:100282. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100282. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
Practitioners' views on shared decision-making implementation: A qualitative study.从业者对共同决策实施的看法:一项定性研究。
大语言模型在神经肿瘤学中的决策辅助作用:综述共享决策应用。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 19;150(3):139. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05673-x.
4
Strategies for meaningful patient and public involvement in neuro-oncological research.让患者和公众切实参与神经肿瘤学研究的策略。
Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Jan 3;11(2):109-110. doi: 10.1093/nop/npad080. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Have a vital end-user been overlooked? Developing a shared decision intervention for patients with potential pancreatic cancer regarding the choice of surgery.是否有重要的终端用户被忽视了?为潜在胰腺癌患者就手术选择制定一项共同决策干预措施。
PEC Innov. 2024 Feb 23;4:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100269. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Treatment of Adult Gliomas: A Current Update.成人胶质瘤的治疗:最新进展
Brain Neurorehabil. 2022 Nov 29;15(3):e24. doi: 10.12786/bn.2022.15.e24. eCollection 2022 Nov.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 11;16(11):e0259844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259844. eCollection 2021.
4
The Importance of Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Glioblastoma.共同决策对胶质母细胞瘤患者的重要性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Sep 10;15:2009-2016. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S314792. eCollection 2021.
5
Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.系统开发患者决策辅助工具:来自 IPDAS 合作组织的最新更新。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):736-754. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211014163. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
6
Shared decision-making in neurosurgery: a scoping review.神经外科中的共享决策:范围综述。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Sep;163(9):2371-2382. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04867-3. Epub 2021 May 3.
7
'What happens if I do nothing?' A Systematic Review of the Inclusion and Quantitative Description of a 'No Active Intervention' Option in Patient Decision Aids.“如果我什么都不做会怎样?”患者决策辅助工具中“无积极干预”选项的纳入及定量描述的系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):3897-3899. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06444-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
8
How much time do we have? Longitudinal perception of prognosis in newly-diagnosed high grade glioma patients and caregivers compared to clinicians.我们还有多少时间?与临床医生相比,新诊断的高级别胶质瘤患者及其照顾者对预后的纵向感知。
J Neurooncol. 2021 Apr;152(2):313-323. doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03700-2. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
9
What Works in Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Routine Clinical Settings? A Rapid Realist Review and Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration.在常规临床环境中实施患者决策辅助工具的有效方法有哪些?国际患者决策辅助标准协作的快速务实综述和更新。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):907-937. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20978208. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
10
Shared decision making in high-grade glioma patients-a systematic review.高级别胶质瘤患者的共同决策——一项系统综述
Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Jul 24;7(6):589-598. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaa042. eCollection 2020 Dec.