• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国实施第二诊疗意见指令的医生观点——探索性序贯混合方法研究。

Physicians' Perspectives on the Implementation of the Second Opinion Directive in Germany-An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), 15562 Rüdersdorf, Germany.

Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7426. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127426.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19127426
PMID:35742675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9224158/
Abstract

A new Second Opinion Directive (SOD) was introduced in Germany in December 2018 for hysterectomy, tonsillotomy, and tonsillectomy to support shared decision making and to avoid unnecessary surgeries. Owing to its recent implementation, evidence and insights regarding outcomes and challenges encountered with the SOD are lacking, notably from the physicians' perspective. To assess this, we undertook an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design with an initial qualitative phase followed by a quantitative evaluation. A qualitative analysis of 22 interviews with specialists in gynecology and otorhinolaryngology was followed by a statistical analysis of a survey of 136 physicians in those disciplines. The specialists expressed a generally positive opinion of the new SOD, emphasizing the aspects of patient orientation, support in decision making, and patient safety. However, they also highlighted the following structural problems regarding the SOD implementation: In addition to an increased organisational effort, the specialists criticised the SOD with regard to its implementation in rural regions with a low availability of specialists for referral. Barriers that impede the implementation of the current directive, such as the adaptation of the qualifying requirements for authorized second opinion physicians, as well as the inclusion of relevant indications, need focused consideration to obtain better alignment with everyday practice.

摘要

德国于 2018 年 12 月引入了新的第二诊疗意见指令(SOD),用于子宫切除术、扁桃体切除术和扁桃体切除术,以支持共同决策并避免不必要的手术。由于该指令最近才实施,因此缺乏关于其结果和所遇到挑战的证据和见解,特别是来自医生的角度。为了评估这一点,我们采用了探索性顺序混合方法设计,首先进行定性分析,然后进行定量评估。对 22 名妇科和耳鼻喉科专家的访谈进行了定性分析,随后对这两个学科的 136 名医生进行了调查的统计分析。专家们对新的 SOD 总体持积极态度,强调了以患者为中心、决策支持和患者安全等方面。然而,他们也强调了 SOD 实施方面的以下结构问题:除了组织工作量增加之外,专家们还批评了 SOD 在农村地区的实施情况,因为那里的转诊专家资源匮乏。目前指令的实施存在障碍,例如授权第二诊疗意见医生的资格要求的调整,以及相关适应症的纳入,需要重点考虑,以更好地与日常实践保持一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977b/9224158/17f0699be234/ijerph-19-07426-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977b/9224158/fa65f7cb0bc6/ijerph-19-07426-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977b/9224158/40ebad08e066/ijerph-19-07426-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977b/9224158/17f0699be234/ijerph-19-07426-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977b/9224158/fa65f7cb0bc6/ijerph-19-07426-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977b/9224158/40ebad08e066/ijerph-19-07426-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/977b/9224158/17f0699be234/ijerph-19-07426-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Physicians' Perspectives on the Implementation of the Second Opinion Directive in Germany-An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.德国实施第二诊疗意见指令的医生观点——探索性序贯混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7426. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127426.
2
Does the second opinion directive in Germany reach the patient? A parallel-convergent mixed-methods study.德国的第二诊疗意见指令是否能传达给患者?一项平行汇聚混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 3;23(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10197-0.
3
Second opinion programmes in Germany: a mixed-methods study protocol.德国第二诊疗意见项目:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 10;11(2):e045264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045264.
4
Second opinion opportunity declined: patient typology and experiences regarding the decision-making process preceding elective surgeries in Germany.二次诊断机会被拒绝:德国患者在选择手术前的决策过程中的类型学和经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):1329. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08742-4.
5
[Second opinion process for tonsillectomy and tonsillotomy: analysis of the quantitative and qualitative justifying conditions].扁桃体切除术和扁桃体切开术的二次诊断流程:对定量和定性论证条件的分析
Laryngorhinootologie. 2021 Jul;100(7):556-561. doi: 10.1055/a-1341-9564. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
6
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
7
[Obtaining a Second Opinion in Germany: an Analysis of the Billing Data of the Health Insurer AOK Nordost].[在德国获取第二诊疗意见:对东北健康保险公司(AOK Nordost)计费数据的分析]
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Jul;86(7):494-498. doi: 10.1055/a-2304-5361. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
8
Beyond Known Barriers-Assessing Physician Perspectives and Attitudes Toward Introducing Open Health Records in Germany: Qualitative Study.突破已知障碍——评估德国医生对引入开放健康记录的观点和态度:定性研究
J Particip Med. 2020 Nov 6;12(4):e19093. doi: 10.2196/19093.
9
Perspectives of Medical Specialists on Sharing Decisions in Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study Concerning Chemotherapy Decisions With Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma.医学专家对癌症治疗中共同决策的看法:一项关于复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者化疗决策的定性研究
Oncologist. 2015 Oct;20(10):1182-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0095. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
10
The development of incorpoRATE: A measure of physicians' willingness to incorporate shared decision making into practice. incorpoRATE 的制定:一项衡量医生将共同决策纳入实践意愿的指标。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2327-2337. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.040. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the second opinion directive in Germany reach the patient? A parallel-convergent mixed-methods study.德国的第二诊疗意见指令是否能传达给患者?一项平行汇聚混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 3;23(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10197-0.
2
Second opinion opportunity declined: patient typology and experiences regarding the decision-making process preceding elective surgeries in Germany.二次诊断机会被拒绝:德国患者在选择手术前的决策过程中的类型学和经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):1329. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08742-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Second opinion programmes in Germany: a mixed-methods study protocol.德国第二诊疗意见项目:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 10;11(2):e045264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045264.
2
[Second opinion process for tonsillectomy and tonsillotomy: analysis of the quantitative and qualitative justifying conditions].扁桃体切除术和扁桃体切开术的二次诊断流程:对定量和定性论证条件的分析
Laryngorhinootologie. 2021 Jul;100(7):556-561. doi: 10.1055/a-1341-9564. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
[Is the number of tonsillectomies and tonsillotomies a relevant issue? German version].
扁桃体切除术和扁桃体切开术的数量是一个相关问题吗?[德语版]
HNO. 2020 Jun;68(6):426-432. doi: 10.1007/s00106-019-00796-x.
4
Seeking a second medical opinion: composition, reasons and perceived outcomes in Israel.寻求第二种医学意见:以色列的构成、原因及感知结果
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017 Dec 8;6(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13584-017-0191-y.
5
Patient-Driven Second Opinions in Oncology: A Systematic Review.肿瘤患者导向的第二诊疗意见:系统评价。
Oncologist. 2017 Oct;22(10):1197-1211. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0429. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
6
Information Deficits and Second Opinion Seeking - A Survey on Cancer Patients.信息不足与寻求第二种意见——一项针对癌症患者的调查
Cancer Invest. 2017 Jan 2;35(1):62-69. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2016.1242012. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
7
The Health Care Strengthening Act: The next level of integrated care in Germany.《医疗保健强化法案》:德国综合医疗的新高度。
Health Policy. 2016 May;120(5):445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
8
Achieving change in primary care--causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews.实现初级保健变革——证据与实践差距的成因:综述的系统评价
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 22;11:40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0396-4.
9
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
10
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察研究报告的强化(STROBE)声明:观察研究报告指南》。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 18.