Suppr超能文献

[在德国获取第二诊疗意见:对东北健康保险公司(AOK Nordost)计费数据的分析]

[Obtaining a Second Opinion in Germany: an Analysis of the Billing Data of the Health Insurer AOK Nordost].

作者信息

Bruch Dunja, Resch Olga, Sehlen Stephanie, Prediger Barbara, Schröter Filip, Franzen Achim, Ronckers Cecile, Neugebauer Edmund, May Susann

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Bernau bei Berlin, Germany.

Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Bernau bei Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Jul;86(7):494-498. doi: 10.1055/a-2304-5361. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this billing data analysis was to examine the implementation of the second opinion directive in Germany and to investigate how often informing patients about their right to a second opinion (SO) and obtaining a SO are documented.

METHODS

To examine the frequency of "informing about SO" and "obtaining an SO", insured patients who received an indication for tonsillectomy, tonsillotomy or hysterectomy in 2019 or 2020 were included, as well as insured patients who received an indication for shoulder arthroscopy in Q2-Q3 2020. Data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

During the study period, 5307 surgeries were reported for the above-mentioned indications. "Informing about SO" was documented for 121 patients with surgery and "obtaining an SO" was documented for 12 patients with surgery. The proportion of documented "informing about SO" compared to the number of surgeries was highest for tonsillectomy/tonsillotomy<18 years (4%) and lowest for shoulder arthroscopy (0.6%). In total, no patient was documented for both "informing about SO" and "obtaining an SO".

CONCLUSIONS

The present billing data analysis shows that information about the right to an SO according to the directive as well as the obtaining of such an SO has not yet been implemented in standard care as required by law.

摘要

目的

本次计费数据分析的目的是研究德国第二诊疗意见指令的实施情况,并调查记录告知患者其享有第二诊疗意见(SO)权利以及获取第二诊疗意见的频率。

方法

为了研究“告知第二诊疗意见”和“获取第二诊疗意见”的频率,纳入了在2019年或2020年接受扁桃体切除术、扁桃体切开术或子宫切除术指征的参保患者,以及在2020年第二季度至第三季度接受肩关节镜检查指征的参保患者。对数据进行描述性分析。

结果

在研究期间,报告了上述指征的5307例手术。121例手术患者记录了“告知第二诊疗意见”,12例手术患者记录了“获取第二诊疗意见”。扁桃体切除术/扁桃体切开术(<18岁)记录的“告知第二诊疗意见”与手术例数的比例最高(4%),肩关节镜检查记录的比例最低(0.6%)。总体而言,没有患者同时记录了“告知第二诊疗意见”和“获取第二诊疗意见”。

结论

本次计费数据分析表明,根据指令关于第二诊疗意见权利的信息以及获取第二诊疗意见的情况尚未按照法律要求在标准医疗中得到落实。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验