Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Sport and Health University Research Center (iMUDS), Granada, Spain.
Sports Biomech. 2023 Mar;22(3):388-409. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2022.2089589. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
This systematic review aims to synthesise the effects of current shoe models in each shoe category and their specific features on running economy, performance and biomechanics. Electronic databases such as Web of Science, SPORTDiscuss, PubMed and Scopus were used to identify studies from 2015 to date. Due to the existing lack of consensus to define running shoes, only studies that specified the shoe brand and models used to assess their effect over runners with a certain level of fitness and training routine were included. Quality assessment of cross-sectional and intervention studies was conducted by three independent raters using a modified version of the Quality Index and the PEDro scale, respectively. A total of 36 articles were finally included, involving the analysis of 61 different shoe models over 10 different topics (i.e., running economy, running performance, spatiotemporal parameters, ground reaction forces, joint stiffness, achilles tendon, plantar pressure, tibiofemoral load, foot strike pattern and joint coordination). With this review, runners and practitioners in the field that are concerned about selecting a suitable shoe for performance, training, or injury prevention functionality have clear information about the effects of the current shoe models and their specific features.
本系统综述旨在综合当前各鞋类鞋款及其特定功能对跑步经济性、性能和生物力学的影响。使用电子数据库（如 Web of Science、SPORTDiscuss、PubMed 和 Scopus）从 2015 年至今检索研究。由于目前对于跑鞋的定义尚未达成共识，仅纳入了明确指定所使用鞋类品牌和型号以评估其对特定健康水平和训练常规的跑步者的影响的研究。使用改良后的质量指数（Quality Index）和 PEDro 量表，由三位独立评估者对横断面研究和干预研究进行质量评估。最终共纳入 36 篇文章，涉及 10 个不同主题（即跑步经济性、跑步性能、时空参数、地面反作用力、关节刚度、跟腱、足底压力、胫股关节负荷、足触地模式和关节协调性）共 61 种不同鞋款的分析。通过本次综述，关注为提高表现、训练或预防损伤而选择合适鞋类的跑步者和领域从业者可以获得有关当前鞋款及其特定功能的影响的明确信息。
