School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
NatureMetrics Ltd, Guildford, UK.
Mol Ecol Resour. 2022 Nov;22(8):2956-2966. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13677. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
Large and hyperdiverse marine ecosystems pose significant challenges to biodiversity monitoring. While environmental DNA (eDNA) promises to meet many of these challenges, recent studies suggested that sponges, as "natural samplers" of eDNA, could further streamline the workflow for detecting marine vertebrates. However, beyond pilot studies demonstrating the ability of sponges to capture eDNA, little is known about the dynamics of eDNA particles in sponge tissue, and the effectiveness of the latter compared to water samples. Here, we present the results of a controlled aquarium experiment to examine the persistence and detectability of eDNA captured by three encrusting sponge species and compare the sponge's eDNA capturing ability with established water filtration techniques. Our results indicate that sponges and water samples have highly similar detectability for fish of different sizes and abundances, but different sponge species exhibit considerable variance in performance. Interestingly, one sponge appeared to mirror the eDNA degradation profile of water samples, while another sponge retained eDNA throughout the experiment. A third sponge yielded virtually no DNA sequences at all. Overall, our study suggests that some sponges will be suitable as natural samplers, while others will introduce significant problems for laboratory processing. We suggest that an initial optimization phase will be required in any future studies aiming to employ sponges for biodiversity assessment. With time, factoring in technical and natural accessibility, it is expected that specific sponge taxa may become the "chosen" natural samplers in certain habitats and regions.
大型且高度多样化的海洋生态系统对生物多样性监测提出了重大挑战。尽管环境 DNA(eDNA)有望应对其中的许多挑战,但最近的研究表明,海绵作为 eDNA 的“天然采样器”,可以进一步简化检测海洋脊椎动物的工作流程。然而,除了证明海绵能够捕获 eDNA 的试点研究之外,人们对海绵组织中 eDNA 颗粒的动态以及与水样相比后者的有效性知之甚少。在这里,我们展示了一项受控水族馆实验的结果,该实验旨在研究三种固着海绵物种捕获的 eDNA 的持久性和可检测性,并比较海绵的 eDNA 捕获能力与已建立的水过滤技术。我们的结果表明,海绵和水样对不同大小和丰度的鱼类具有高度相似的可检测性,但不同的海绵物种在性能上存在相当大的差异。有趣的是,一种海绵似乎反映了水样的 eDNA 降解情况,而另一种海绵在整个实验过程中保留了 eDNA。第三种海绵几乎没有产生任何 DNA 序列。总的来说,我们的研究表明,一些海绵将适合作为天然采样器,而其他海绵将在实验室处理过程中带来重大问题。我们建议,在任何旨在利用海绵进行生物多样性评估的未来研究中,都需要进行初始优化阶段。随着时间的推移,考虑到技术和自然的可及性,预计某些海绵类群将成为某些栖息地和地区的“首选”天然采样器。