Centre for Psychosocial Health, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Centre for Psychosocial Health, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Aug;152:260-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.05.033. Epub 2022 May 24.
This study examined the mediating effects of coping resources in the prospective associations between daily routine disruptions in the acute phase of COVID-19 and persistent probable anxiety and depression. A prospective, population-representative cohort of 1318 Hong Kong Chinese respondents completed a baseline survey between February and July 2020 (T1) and a 1-year follow-up survey between March and August 2021 (T2). Respondents reported demographics and disruptions to primary and secondary daily routines at T1, coping resources (i.e., self-efficacy and meaning making) at T2, and anxiety and depressive symptoms at T1 and T2. We found that 8.1% and 10.0% of respondents reached cutoff scores for probable anxiety and depression respectively at both T1 and T2. Logistic regression showed that T1 daily routine disruptions were positively associated with heightened risk of persistent probable anxiety and depression amid COVID-19. Path analysis showed that 15.3% and 13.1% of the associations of daily routine disruptions with persistent probable anxiety and depression were explained by coping resources, respectively, while the direct routine-outcome associations remained significant. Daily routine disruptions predict higher odds of persistent probable anxiety and depression directly and partially through reducing coping resources. Sustainment of regular daily routines should be advocated and fostered to enhance coping resources and reduce the risk of poorer adjustment among the affected populations amid public health crises.
本研究考察了应对资源在 COVID-19 急性阶段日常活动中断与持续性可能焦虑和抑郁之间的前瞻性关联中的中介作用。一项针对 1318 名香港华人的前瞻性、代表性人群队列研究于 2020 年 2 月至 7 月(T1)和 2021 年 3 月至 8 月(T2)进行了基线调查和 1 年随访调查。受访者在 T1 时报告了人口统计学和主要和次要日常活动的中断、T2 时的应对资源(即自我效能和意义构建)以及 T1 和 T2 时的焦虑和抑郁症状。我们发现,8.1%和 10.0%的受访者在 T1 和 T2 时的可能焦虑和抑郁的截距分数均达到临界值。逻辑回归显示,T1 日常活动中断与 COVID-19 期间持续性可能焦虑和抑郁的风险升高呈正相关。路径分析显示,日常活动中断与持续性可能焦虑和抑郁的关联中有 15.3%和 13.1%分别可以通过应对资源来解释,而日常活动与结果的直接关联仍然显著。日常活动中断直接和部分通过减少应对资源来预测持续性可能焦虑和抑郁的更高几率。在公共卫生危机期间,应倡导和培养规律的日常活动,以增强应对资源并降低受影响人群调整不良的风险。