Suppr超能文献

奥地利新冠疫情封锁期间与封锁后6个月的心理健康状况比较:一项纵向研究

Comparing Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown and 6 Months After the Lockdown in Austria: A Longitudinal Study.

作者信息

Pieh Christoph, Budimir Sanja, Humer Elke, Probst Thomas

机构信息

Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria.

Department of Work, Organization and Society, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 30;12:625973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.625973. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has repeatedly been reported to impair mental health. This longitudinal study evaluated mental health at the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic (t1) and 6 months later (t2) in Austria. Indicators of mental health were depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), sleep quality (ISI), perceived stress (PSS-10), as well as quality of life (WHO-QOL BREF) and well-being (WHO-5). In total, = 437 individuals participated in both surveys (52.9% women). The number of participants with clinically relevant depressive, anxiety, or insomnia symptoms did not differ statistically significantly between t1 and t2 ( ≥ 0.48). The prevalence of moderate or severe (clinically relevant) (1) depressive symptoms changed from 18.3% to 19.7% ( = 0.48), (2) anxiety symptoms from 16.5 to 15.6% ( = 0.67), and insomnia from 14.6 to 15.6% ( = 0.69) from t1 to t2. Bonferroni-corrected -tests showed that the stress level (PSS-10) decreased, and well-being (WHO-5) increased. However, effect sizes do not seem to be clinically relevant (Cohen's < 0.2). Results suggest that detrimental health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic persisted several months after its outbreak and the end of the lockdown measures, respectively. Regarding well-being and stress, there is a slight trend toward improvement.

摘要

新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)多次被报道会损害心理健康。这项纵向研究评估了奥地利在COVID-19大流行出现时(t1)和6个月后(t2)的心理健康状况。心理健康指标包括抑郁(PHQ-9)、焦虑(GAD-7)、睡眠质量(ISI)、感知压力(PSS-10),以及生活质量(WHO-QOL BREF)和幸福感(WHO-5)。共有437人参与了两项调查(女性占52.9%)。在t1和t2之间,有临床相关抑郁、焦虑或失眠症状的参与者数量在统计学上没有显著差异(P≥0.48)。从t1到t2,中度或重度(临床相关)(1)抑郁症状的患病率从18.3%变为19.7%(P = 0.48),(2)焦虑症状从16.5%变为15.6%(P = 0.67),失眠从14.6%变为15.6%(P = 0.69)。经Bonferroni校正的t检验表明,压力水平(PSS-10)下降,幸福感(WHO-5)增加。然而,效应大小似乎在临床上并不显著(科恩d<0.2)。结果表明,COVID-19大流行的有害健康后果分别在疫情爆发和封锁措施结束后的几个月内持续存在。在幸福感和压力方面,有轻微的改善趋势。

相似文献

4
Coping strategies and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown.应对 COVID-19 封锁期间的策略和心理健康。
J Ment Health. 2021 Apr;30(2):156-163. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1875412. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown.新冠疫情封锁期间的人际关系质量与心理健康
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238906. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Diminished well-being persists beyond the end of the COVID-19 lockdown.新冠疫情封锁结束后,幸福感降低的情况依然存在。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021 May-Jun;70:137-138. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.01.004. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
4
Psychological distress and adaptation to the COVID-19 crisis in the United States.美国民众的心理困扰与对新冠危机的适应。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Apr;136:603-609. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.10.035. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验