Zingela Zukiswa, Stroud Louise, Cronje Johan, Fink Max, van Wyk Stephan
Executive Dean's Office, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, South Africa.
Department of Psychology, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, South Africa.
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Jun 20;10:20503121221105579. doi: 10.1177/20503121221105579. eCollection 2022.
Rapid intervention for catatonia with benzodiazepines and electroconvulsive therapy can prevent fatal complications. We describe the management and treatment response of 44 patients with catatonia in a psychiatric unit in urban South Africa. The objective was to screen admissions for catatonia and investigate management, treatment response, and treatment outcomes.
We used a prospective, descriptive, observational study design and collected data using a data collection sheet, the Bush Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument, the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale, and the -5 to assess catatonia in new admissions from September 2020 to August 2021.
Of the 241 participants screened on admission, 44 (18.3% of 241) screened positive for catatonia on the Bush Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument, while 197 (81.7% of 241) did not. Thirty-eight (86.4% of 44) received lorazepam, seven (15.9%) received clonazepam, and two (4.6%) received diazepam, implying that three (6.8%) of the 44 participants with catatonia received more than one benzodiazepine sequentially. Ten (22.7% of 44) patients received electroconvulsive therapy. Seven of those treated with electroconvulsive therapy (15.9% of 44 and 70% of 10) responded well and were discharged, whereas 22 (50% of 44 and 64.7% of 34) of those given lorazepam were discharged. Patients treated with electroconvulsive therapy had a higher initial Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale score. One patient (2.3%) relapsed within 4 weeks of discharge. Twenty (45.5%) of the 44 patients with catatonia had low average iron levels, 14 (31.8%) had low vitamin B12, and 24 (54.6%) had high creatinine kinase.
Both lorazepam and electroconvulsive therapy were found to be effective treatments for catatonia with good response and outcomes. The length of hospital stay of patients with catatonia was similar to that of patients without catatonia. Treatment guidelines for catatonia need to include the role and timing of electroconvulsive therapy to augment current treatment protocols for the use of lorazepam.
使用苯二氮䓬类药物和电休克疗法对紧张症进行快速干预可预防致命并发症。我们描述了南非城市一家精神病科44例紧张症患者的管理及治疗反应。目的是筛查入院患者是否患有紧张症,并调查管理情况、治疗反应及治疗结果。
我们采用前瞻性、描述性观察性研究设计,使用数据收集表、布什-弗朗西斯紧张症筛查工具、布什-弗朗西斯紧张症评定量表以及-5量表,对2020年9月至2021年8月新入院患者进行紧张症评估并收集数据。
在241名入院时接受筛查的参与者中,44名(占241名的18.3%)在布什-弗朗西斯紧张症筛查工具上筛查出紧张症呈阳性,而197名(占241名的81.7%)未呈阳性。38名(占44名的86.4%)接受了劳拉西泮治疗,7名(15.9%)接受了氯硝西泮治疗,2名(4.6%)接受了地西泮治疗,这意味着44名紧张症患者中有3名(6.8%)先后接受了不止一种苯二氮䓬类药物治疗。10名(占44名的22.7%)患者接受了电休克疗法。接受电休克疗法的患者中有7名(占44名的15.9%,占10名的70%)反应良好并出院,而接受劳拉西泮治疗的患者中有22名(占44名的50%,占34名的64.7%)出院。接受电休克疗法的患者初始布什-弗朗西斯紧张症评定量表得分较高。1名患者(2.3%)在出院后4周内复发。44名紧张症患者中有20名(45.5%)平均铁水平较低,14名(31.8%)维生素B12水平较低,24名(54.6%)肌酸激酶水平较高。
劳拉西泮和电休克疗法均被发现是治疗紧张症的有效方法,反应和结果良好。紧张症患者的住院时间与非紧张症患者相似。紧张症的治疗指南需要纳入电休克疗法的作用及时机,以完善当前使用劳拉西泮的治疗方案。