Rudaizky Daniel, Bebbington Keely, Davis Elizabeth A, Radcliffe Wendy, MacLeod Colin, Hunt Anna, Chen Nigel, Jones Timothy W, Lin Ashleigh
School of Population Health, Curtin University, Australia.
School of Psychological Science, University of Western, Australia.
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2021 Jun 6;7:100065. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100065. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Previous research has established that adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) experience more anxiety symptoms than their healthy peers and are also more likely to develop an anxiety disorder. Research in cognitive psychology has found that selective attention favouring the processing of threatening information causally contributes to elevated levels of anxiety; however, this process has not been investigated in the context of T1D. The current study examined whether selective attention for threatening information contributes to the association between anxiety and glycaemic management in adolescents with T1D.
Participants completed a dot-probe task to assess selective attention for diabetes-related threatening information and general non-diabetes-related threatening information and we examined the associations between these measures and measures of HbA1c and anxiety.
Findings suggest that individual differences in anxiety vulnerability do not predict HbA1c alongside the attentional bias for threatening information.
The attentional bias for threatening information makes a contribution to the relationship between anxiety and glycaemic management and may represent a target for therapeutic intervention to both reduce anxiety and improve glycaemic management.
先前的研究已证实,1型糖尿病(T1D)青少年比健康同龄人经历更多的焦虑症状,且更有可能患上焦虑症。认知心理学研究发现,倾向于处理威胁性信息的选择性注意会导致焦虑水平升高;然而,这一过程尚未在T1D背景下进行研究。本研究调查了对威胁性信息的选择性注意是否有助于解释T1D青少年焦虑与血糖管理之间的关联。
参与者完成了一项点探测任务,以评估对糖尿病相关威胁性信息和一般非糖尿病相关威胁性信息的选择性注意,我们研究了这些测量指标与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测量指标及焦虑之间的关联。
研究结果表明,焦虑易感性的个体差异并不能与对威胁性信息的注意偏向一起预测HbA1c。
对威胁性信息的注意偏向对焦虑与血糖管理之间的关系有影响,可能是减少焦虑和改善血糖管理的治疗干预目标。