Suppr超能文献

精神科研究中的数字生物标志物:复杂生态系统中的数据保护资质

Digital Biomarkers in Psychiatric Research: Data Protection Qualifications in a Complex Ecosystem.

作者信息

Parziale Andrea, Mascalzoni Deborah

机构信息

Institute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 9;13:873392. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.873392. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Psychiatric research traditionally relies on subjective observation, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. The widespread use of digital devices, such as smartphones and wearables, enables the collection and use of vast amounts of user-generated data as "digital biomarkers." These tools may also support increased participation of psychiatric patients in research and, as a result, the production of research results that are meaningful to them. However, sharing mental health data and research results may expose patients to discrimination and stigma risks, thus discouraging participation. To earn and maintain participants' trust, the first essential requirement is to implement an appropriate data governance system with a clear and transparent allocation of data protection duties and responsibilities among the actors involved in the process. These include sponsors, investigators, operators of digital tools, as well as healthcare service providers and biobanks/databanks. While previous works have proposed practical solutions to this end, there is a lack of consideration of positive data protection law issues in the extant literature. To start filling this gap, this paper discusses the GDPR legal qualifications of controller, processor, and joint controllers in the complex ecosystem unfolded by the integration of digital biomarkers in psychiatric research, considering their implications and proposing some general practical recommendations.

摘要

传统上,精神病学研究依赖于主观观察,这种方法既耗时又费力。智能手机和可穿戴设备等数字设备的广泛使用,使得收集和使用大量用户生成的数据作为“数字生物标志物”成为可能。这些工具还可能有助于提高精神病患者参与研究的程度,从而产生对他们有意义的研究结果。然而,分享心理健康数据和研究结果可能会使患者面临歧视和污名化风险,从而降低他们参与的积极性。为了赢得并维持参与者的信任,首要的基本要求是实施适当的数据治理系统,在参与这一过程的各方(包括赞助商、研究人员、数字工具运营商以及医疗服务提供商和生物样本库/数据库)之间明确且透明地分配数据保护职责。虽然之前的工作已经为此提出了切实可行的解决方案,但现有文献中缺乏对积极数据保护法律问题的考虑。为了开始填补这一空白,本文讨论了在精神病学研究中数字生物标志物整合所展现的复杂生态系统中,数据控制者、处理者和联合控制者的通用数据保护条例(GDPR)法律资质,考虑了它们的影响并提出了一些一般性的实用建议。

相似文献

4
Towards trust-based governance of health data research.迈向基于信任的健康数据研究治理。
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Jun;26(2):185-200. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10134-8. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
5
Ethical and Legal Implications of Remote Monitoring of Medical Devices.医疗器械远程监测的伦理和法律问题
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1257-1289. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12481. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
8
Identification of IoT Actors.物联网参与者的识别
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;21(6):2093. doi: 10.3390/s21062093.

引用本文的文献

4
Mapping the ethical landscape of digital biomarkers: A scoping review.绘制数字生物标志物的伦理版图:一项范围综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 May 16;3(5):e0000519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000519. eCollection 2024 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital/computational phenotyping: What are the differences in the science and the ethics?数字/计算表型分析:科学与伦理方面有哪些差异?
Big Data Soc. 2021 Dec 23;8(2):20539517211062885. doi: 10.1177/20539517211062885. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
9
The Future of Digital Health: Meeting Report.数字健康的未来:会议报告
Digit Biomark. 2021 Apr 16;5(1):74-77. doi: 10.1159/000515355. eCollection 2021 Jan-Apr.
10
From multivariate methods to an AI ecosystem.从多元方法到人工智能生态系统。
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;26(11):6116-6120. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01116-y. Epub 2021 May 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验