Lazris David, Donovan Heidi S, Scott Paul, Nilsen Marci L, Thomas Teresa Hagan
Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Nov 2. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4.
Understanding gender variations in self-advocacy can help oncology clinicians support the educational needs of cancer survivors. This study aims to examine the role of gender along with additional other sociodemographic variables in how cancer survivors self-advocate including their engagement in decision-making, communication with healthcare providers, and use of social support. Data from two cross-sectional descriptive studies were combined for analyses. Each study used convenience sampling methods to recruit adults (≥ 18 years old) with a history of invasive cancer who had English literacy from cancer clinics and community advocacy groups. The first study recruited women (n = 317), and the second study recruited men (n = 179). In both studies, participants completed two assessments of self-advocacy: Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship (SACS) Scale and the Patient Self-Advocacy Scale. We built a linear regression model to test the association between gender and self-advocacy total and subscale scores controlling for covariates. N = 496 participants completed study procedures between 2014 and 2022. On both self-advocacy scales, women reported higher self-advocacy scores compared to men, with women's higher scores on the SACS subscales of connected strength and informed decision-making driving the gender difference in cancer-specific self-advocacy. Self-advocacy behaviors are associated with gender, most notably by way of individuals' ability to derive strength through social connection. Women tend to have greater engagement in care with larger and more meaningful social networks, while men report less engagement. Educational materials for cancer survivors should leverage gender-associated self-advocacy skills and bolster skills that require support.
了解自我维权方面的性别差异有助于肿瘤临床医生满足癌症幸存者的教育需求。本研究旨在探讨性别以及其他社会人口统计学变量在癌症幸存者自我维权方式中的作用,包括他们参与决策、与医疗服务提供者沟通以及利用社会支持的情况。对两项横断面描述性研究的数据进行了合并分析。每项研究都采用便利抽样方法,从癌症诊所和社区宣传团体中招募有浸润性癌症病史且具备英语读写能力的成年人(≥18岁)。第一项研究招募了女性(n = 317),第二项研究招募了男性(n = 179)。在两项研究中,参与者都完成了两项自我维权评估:癌症幸存者自我维权(SACS)量表和患者自我维权量表。我们建立了一个线性回归模型,以检验在控制协变量的情况下性别与自我维权总分及各子量表得分之间的关联。N = 496名参与者在2014年至2022年期间完成了研究程序。在两项自我维权量表上,女性报告的自我维权得分均高于男性,女性在SACS量表的“联系力量”和“知情决策”子量表上得分较高,这推动了癌症特异性自我维权方面的性别差异。自我维权行为与性别相关,最显著的是通过个人从社会联系中获取力量的能力。女性往往通过更大、更有意义的社交网络更多地参与护理,而男性参与度较低。针对癌症幸存者的教育材料应利用与性别相关的自我维权技能,并加强需要支持的技能。