• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子医疗干预对护士心理健康的有效性:一项符合 PRISMA 标准的随机对照试验的系统评价。

The effectiveness of e-healthcare interventions for mental health of nurses: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Dong-eui University, 52-57 Yangjeong-ro, Busanjin-gu, Busan, Republic of Korea.

KM Science Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriebtal Medicine, 1672 Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jun 24;101(25):e29125. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029125.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000029125
PMID:35758346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9276241/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mental health problems, including burnout among nurses, are common and important. With the rapid development of information and communication technologies and the rise in use of smartphones, the use of e-mental health strategies is increasing in public and clinical settings, and initial clinical trials using this intervention have been conducted. This systematic review evaluated whether e-healthcare interventions improve burnout and other mental health aspects in nurses.

METHODS

Six electronic databases including MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (via Elsevier), the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and PsycARTICLES were searched to collect relevant randomized controlled trials up to January 28, 2021, using e-healthcare interventions for mental health in nurses. The e-healthcare intervention was classified as web-based, smartphone-based, and real-time online interventions. The primary outcome was burnout in this population. Due to the heterogeneity of the interventions used in the included studies, quantitative synthesis was not performed, but included studies were analyzed qualitatively. Also, the details of e-healthcare for the mental health of nurses were analyzed. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials were included in this study. The 20-minute session of an online form of the emotional freedom technique was reported to significantly improve burnout severity compared to no intervention (P < .001). Other outcomes, such as career identity, quality of work life, workplace bullying, job stress, turnover intention, distress, anxiety, and resilience in nurses, were also reported to be improved by e-healthcare interventions. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally poor.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, there was some evidence that e-healthcare interventions may improve mental health outcomes, including burnout in nurses, compared with no intervention. However, due to the poor methodological quality and wide heterogeneity of the interventions and outcomes in the included studies, we were not able to reach sufficiently reliable conclusions. E-healthcare intervention for nurses in the new coronavirus disease era was discussed. High-quality clinical trials in this area should be conducted in the future.

摘要

背景

心理健康问题,包括护士的职业倦怠,是常见且重要的。随着信息和通信技术的快速发展以及智能手机的广泛应用,电子心理健康策略在公共和临床环境中的使用不断增加,并且已经进行了初步的临床试验。本系统评价评估了电子医疗干预措施是否可以改善护士的职业倦怠和其他心理健康方面。

方法

检索了 6 个电子数据库,包括 MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、EMBASE(通过 Elsevier)、Cochrane 图书馆对照试验中心注册库、护理学和联合健康文献累积索引、联合与补充医学数据库以及 PsycARTICLES,以收集截至 2021 年 1 月 28 日有关护士心理健康的电子医疗干预措施的相关随机对照试验。将电子医疗干预措施分为基于网络、基于智能手机和实时在线干预措施。主要结局是该人群中的职业倦怠。由于纳入研究中使用的干预措施存在异质性,因此未进行定量综合,但对纳入研究进行了定性分析。同时,还分析了护士心理健康的电子医疗详细信息。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。

结果

本研究纳入了 7 项随机对照试验。与无干预相比,在线形式的情感自由技术 20 分钟疗程报告显示职业倦怠严重程度显著改善(P<0.001)。其他结果,如护士的职业认同、工作生活质量、工作场所欺凌、工作压力、离职意向、困扰、焦虑和恢复力,也报告通过电子医疗干预得到改善。纳入研究的方法学质量普遍较差。

结论

总之,有一些证据表明,与无干预相比,电子医疗干预措施可能会改善心理健康结果,包括护士的职业倦怠。然而,由于纳入研究中干预措施和结果的方法学质量差且异质性大,我们无法得出足够可靠的结论。讨论了在新冠病毒疾病时代对护士的电子医疗干预。未来应在该领域进行高质量的临床试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa62/9276241/bbaba1d88b25/medi-101-e29125-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa62/9276241/00b0fa1fff5d/medi-101-e29125-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa62/9276241/514e936025eb/medi-101-e29125-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa62/9276241/bbaba1d88b25/medi-101-e29125-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa62/9276241/00b0fa1fff5d/medi-101-e29125-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa62/9276241/514e936025eb/medi-101-e29125-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa62/9276241/bbaba1d88b25/medi-101-e29125-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of e-healthcare interventions for mental health of nurses: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of randomized controlled trials.电子医疗干预对护士心理健康的有效性:一项符合 PRISMA 标准的随机对照试验的系统评价。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jun 24;101(25):e29125. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029125.
2
The effectiveness of mindfulness based programs in reducing stress experienced by nurses in adult hospital settings: a systematic review of quantitative evidence protocol.基于正念的项目在减轻成人医院环境中护士所经历压力方面的有效性:定量证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):21-9. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2380.
3
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.针对成年癌症患者症状管理的电话干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2.
4
Interventions to reduce burnout and improve the mental health of nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-analysis.COVID-19大流行期间减轻护士职业倦怠并改善其心理健康的干预措施:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Apr;33(2):324-343. doi: 10.1111/inm.13251. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Preventive staff-support interventions for health workers.针对卫生工作者的预防性员工支持干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD003541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003541.pub2.
7
Art therapy-based interventions to address burnout and psychosocial distress in healthcare workers-a systematic review.基于艺术治疗的干预措施,以解决医护人员的倦怠和心理社会困扰:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 4;23(1):1059. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09958-8.
8
The Effectiveness and Safety of Mind-Body Modalities for Mental Health of Nurses in Hospital Setting: A Systematic Review.身心模式对医院护士心理健康的有效性和安全性:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 23;18(16):8855. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168855.
9
The use of mHealth apps to improve hospital nurses' mental health and well-being: A systematic review.使用移动医疗应用程序改善医院护士的心理健康和幸福感:系统评价。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024 Apr;21(2):110-119. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12716. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
10
Psychoeducational Burnout Intervention for Nurses: Protocol for a Systematic Review.护士心理教育性耗竭干预:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 30;13:e58692. doi: 10.2196/58692.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Digital Interventions in Occupational Health Care: A Systematic Review.数字干预措施在职业卫生保健中的影响:一项系统评价
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025 Mar 18;3(2):100216. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100216. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Understanding turnover in healthcare and welfare sectors of high-income countries: an umbrella review.理解高收入国家医疗保健和福利部门的人员更替:一项综合综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jun 5;25(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12966-5.
3
Digital Wellness Programs in the Workplace: Meta-Review.
工作场所的数字健康计划:元综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 14;27:e70982. doi: 10.2196/70982.
4
Effectiveness of Digital Mental Health Interventions in the Workplace: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.数字心理健康干预措施在工作场所的有效性:系统评价的伞状综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jan 24;12:e67785. doi: 10.2196/67785.
5
Managing the work stress of inpatient nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of organizational interventions.应对新冠疫情期间住院部护士的工作压力:组织干预措施的系统评价
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 27;23(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02358-1.
6
Effects of interventions implemented by occupational health professionals to prevent work-related stress complaints: a systematic review.职业健康专业人员实施的干预措施对预防与工作相关的压力投诉的影响:系统评价。
Occup Environ Med. 2024 Jul 10;81(6):321-328. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109454.
7
Modeling inter-individual differences in ambulatory-based multimodal signals via metric learning: a case study of personalized well-being estimation of healthcare workers.通过度量学习对基于动态的多模态信号中的个体差异进行建模:以医护人员个性化幸福感估计为例
Front Digit Health. 2023 Jun 9;5:1195795. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1195795. eCollection 2023.
8
Interventions on Well-being, Occupational Health, and Aging of Healthcare Workers: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews.医护人员福祉、职业健康与老龄化干预措施:系统评价的范围综述
Saf Health Work. 2023 Mar;14(1):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2022.12.003. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
9
Lack of Interventional Studies on Suicide Prevention among Healthcare Workers: Research Gap Revealed in a Systematic Review.缺乏医护人员预防自杀的干预研究:系统评价揭示的研究空白。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 12;19(20):13121. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013121.