Suppr超能文献

自我报告的丛集性头痛治疗效果:系统综述调查研究。

Self-Reported Efficacy of Treatments in Cluster Headache: a Systematic Review of Survey Studies.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022 Aug;26(8):623-637. doi: 10.1007/s11916-022-01063-5. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use and efficacy of various substances in the treatment of CH have been studied in several retrospective surveys. The aim of the study is to systematically review published survey studies to evaluate the reported efficacies of both established and unconventional substances in abortive and prophylactic treatment of both episodic and chronic CH, specifically assessing the consistency of the results.

RECENT FINDINGS

No systematic review have been conducted of these studies previously. A systematic literature search with a set of search terms was conducted on PubMed. Retrospective surveys that quantified the self-reported efficacy of two or more CH treatments, published in English during 2000-2020, were included. Several key characteristics and results of the studies were extracted. A total of 994 articles were identified of which 9 were found to be eligible based on the selection criteria. In total, 5419 respondents were included. Oxygen and subcutaneous triptan injections were most reported as effective abortive treatments, while psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide were most commonly reported as effective prophylactic treatments. The reported efficacy of most substances was consistent across different studies, and there were marked differences in the reported efficacies of different substances. The reported order of efficacy is generally in agreement with clinical studies. The findings suggest that retrospective surveys can be used to obtain supporting information on the effects of various substances used in the treatment of CH and to form hypotheses about novel treatment methods. The consistently reported efficacy of psilocybin and LSD in prophylactic treatment indicates need for clinical studies.

摘要

目的综述

已有多项回顾性研究探讨了各种物质在 CH 治疗中的应用和疗效。本研究旨在系统回顾已发表的调查研究,评估已确立和非传统物质在发作性和慢性 CH 的急性发作和预防性治疗中的疗效报告,具体评估结果的一致性。

最新发现

之前尚未对这些研究进行过系统综述。我们在 PubMed 上使用一组搜索词进行了系统文献检索。纳入了在 2000 年至 2020 年间以英文发表的、定量报告了两种或多种 CH 治疗方法的自我报告疗效的回顾性调查。提取了研究的几个关键特征和结果。共确定了 994 篇文章,其中有 9 篇根据选择标准被认为符合条件。共有 5419 名受访者被纳入。氧气和皮下曲普坦注射被报道为最有效的急性发作治疗方法,而裸盖菇素和麦角酸二乙酰胺被报道为最有效的预防性治疗方法。大多数物质的疗效报告在不同研究中是一致的,而不同物质的疗效报告存在显著差异。报告的疗效顺序通常与临床研究一致。研究结果表明,回顾性调查可用于获得有关 CH 治疗中使用的各种物质的疗效的支持信息,并为新的治疗方法形成假设。裸盖菇素和 LSD 在预防性治疗中一致报告的疗效表明需要进行临床研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b77f/9436841/5bc72a6851a3/11916_2022_1063_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验