Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, U-Vet Werribee Animal Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Animalius Vet, 6 Focal Way, Bayswater, Western Australia.
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Sep;35(5):321-330. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749398. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
The aim of this study was to compare a 3-loop pulley (3LP) suture pattern with a 4-loop pulley (4LP) suture pattern for the tenorrhaphy of the canine gastrocnemius tendon STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, cadaveric, biomechanical study of 30 canine gastrocnemius tendons. Tendons were transected and repaired with either 3LP or 4LP suture pattern with 2-0 polypropylene. A tensile load was applied at 25 mm/min until construct failure. The load required to form a 1 mm gap, 3 mm gap and maximum load at failure was recorded and compared between groups.
The estimated mean load to form a 1 mm gap for the 3LP and 4LP was 28.4 N (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.0-32.6N) and 45.5 N (95% CI: 40.7-50.1N) respectively. The 4LP mean load to form a 1 mm gap was 17.1 N (95% CI: 11.7-22.5N) greater than the 3LP. The estimated mean load to form a 3mm gap for the 3LP and 4LP was 39.7 N (95% CI: 34.1-45.4N) and 55.0 N (95% CI: 49.3-60.9N) respectively. The mean load to form a 3mm gap was 15.3 N (95% CI: 8.5-21.9N) greater in the 4LP than the 3LP. The estimated mean load for failure in the 3LP and 4LP was 41.2 N (95% CI: 35.6-46.9 N) and 54.3 N (95% CI: 48.7-60.3 N) respectively.
A 4LP pattern was biomechanically superior to a 3LP pattern, as demonstrated by a greater load required to form both a 1 and 3 mm gap and a greater load for failure CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A 4LP suture pattern better resists gap formation and requires greater load prior to construct failure compared with a 3LP, in this canine gastrocnemius model.
本研究旨在比较三圈(3LP)缝线和四圈(4LP)缝线在犬腓肠肌腱修复中的应用。
对 30 条犬腓肠肌腱进行随机、尸体、生物力学研究。肌腱用 2-0 聚丙烯缝线以 3LP 或 4LP 缝线缝合。以 25mm/min 的速度施加拉伸载荷,直至结构失效。记录并比较两组之间形成 1mm 间隙、3mm 间隙和最大失效载荷所需的载荷。
3LP 和 4LP 形成 1mm 间隙的估计平均载荷分别为 28.4N(95%置信区间[CI]:24.0-32.6N)和 45.5N(95%CI:40.7-50.1N)。4LP 形成 1mm 间隙的平均载荷比 3LP 高 17.1N(95%CI:11.7-22.5N)。3LP 和 4LP 形成 3mm 间隙的估计平均载荷分别为 39.7N(95%CI:34.1-45.4N)和 55.0N(95%CI:49.3-60.9N)。4LP 形成 3mm 间隙的平均载荷比 3LP 高 15.3N(95%CI:8.5-21.9N)。3LP 和 4LP 的失效平均载荷分别为 41.2N(95%CI:35.6-46.9N)和 54.3N(95%CI:48.7-60.3N)。
与 3LP 相比,4LP 模式在生物力学上更具优势,表现为形成 1mm 和 3mm 间隙所需的载荷更大,以及结构失效前所需的载荷更大。
在这种犬腓肠肌模型中,与 3LP 相比,4LP 缝线模式在形成间隙方面表现更好,在结构失效前需要更大的载荷。