Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Breast. 2022 Oct;65:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
Breast density has become a topic of international discussion due to its associated risk of breast cancer. As online is often a primary source of women's health information it is therefore essential that breast density information it is understandable, accurate and reflects the best available evidence. This study aimed to systematically assess online international breast density information including recommendations to women.
Searches were conducted from five different English-speaking country-specific Google locations. Relevant breast density information was extracted from the identified websites. Readability was assessed using the SHeLL Editor, and understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). A content analysis of specific recommendations to women was also conducted.
Forty-two eligible websites were identified and systematically assessed. The included informational content varied across websites. The average grade reading level across all websites was 12.4 (range 8.9-15.4). The mean understandability was 69.9% and the mean actionability was 40.1%, with 18/42 and 39/42 websites respectively scoring lower than adequate (70%). Thirty-six (85.7%) of the websites had breast density-related recommendation to women, with 'talk to your doctor' (n = 33, 78.6%) the most common.
Online information about breast density varies widely and is not generally presented in a way that women can easily understand and act on, therefore greatly reducing the ability for informed decision-making. International organisations and groups disseminating breast density information need to ensure that women are presented with health literacy-sensitive and balanced information, and be aware of the impact that recommendations may have on practice.
由于乳腺癌的相关风险,乳房密度已成为国际讨论的话题。由于在线通常是女性健康信息的主要来源,因此至关重要的是,乳房密度信息应易于理解、准确,并反映最佳现有证据。本研究旨在系统评估国际在线乳房密度信息,包括向女性提出的建议。
从五个不同的英语国家特定的谷歌搜索位置进行搜索。从确定的网站中提取相关的乳房密度信息。使用 SHeLL 编辑器评估可读性,使用患者教育材料评估工具 (PEMAT) 评估可理解性和可操作性。还对女性特定建议的内容进行了分析。
确定了 42 个符合条件的网站,并对其进行了系统评估。所包括的信息内容因网站而异。所有网站的平均阅读水平为 12.4(范围 8.9-15.4)。平均可理解性为 69.9%,平均可操作性为 40.1%,分别有 18/42 和 39/42 个网站的评分低于 60%(70%)。有 36 个(85.7%)网站向女性提供了与乳房密度相关的建议,其中“与您的医生交谈”(n=33,78.6%)最为常见。
关于乳房密度的在线信息差异很大,通常不以女性易于理解和采取行动的方式呈现,因此大大降低了知情决策的能力。传播乳房密度信息的国际组织和团体需要确保向女性提供具有健康素养意识和平衡的信息,并意识到建议可能对实践产生的影响。