• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家临终治疗偏好随时间保持稳定:国家健康与老龄化趋势研究。

National End-of-Life-Treatment Preferences are Stable Over Time: National Health and Aging Trends Study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology (L.E.S., C.C.L.), Health Services Research Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Department of Neurology (L.E.S., C.C.L.), Health Services Research Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Oct;64(4):e189-e194. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.06.012
PMID:35764201
Abstract

CONTEXT

Advance Care Planning is a process of understanding and sharing preferences regarding future medical care.

OBJECTIVE

To explore individual and national stability of end-of-life treatment preferences among a sample of older adults.

METHODS

National Health and Aging Trends Study is a nationally representative sample of older adults. In 2012, a random sample, and in 2018, the entire sample were queried on end-of-life treatment preferences defined as acceptance or rejection of life prolonging treatment (LPT) if they had a serious illness and were at the end of their life and in severe pain or had severe disability. Using a cohort design, we explored individual trends in preferences for LPT among those with responses in both waves (pain scenario: N = 606, disability scenario: N = 628) and, using a serial cross-sectional design, national trends in LPT among the entire sample (1702 older adults in wave 2 and 4342 in wave 8).

RESULTS

In the cohort study, individual preferences were stable over time (overall percent agreement = 86% for disability and 76% for pain scenarios), particularly for older adults who would reject LPT in wave 2 (overall agreement 92% for disability and 86% for pain). In the serial cross-sectional study, national trends in preferences for receipt of LPT were stable over time in the pain (27.4% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.80) and disability (15.8% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.99) scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that national trends in preferences for end-of-life treatment did not substantially change over time and may be stable within individual older adults.

摘要

背景

预先医疗照护计划是一个了解和分享未来医疗照护偏好的过程。

目的

探索老年人群样本中临终治疗偏好的个体和国家稳定性。

方法

国家健康老龄化趋势研究是一个具有代表性的老年人群样本。在 2012 年,对一个随机样本进行了调查,在 2018 年,对整个样本进行了调查,询问了临终治疗偏好,即如果他们患有严重疾病,生命即将结束,处于严重疼痛或严重残疾状态,是否接受或拒绝延长生命的治疗(LPT)。使用队列设计,我们在两个波次(疼痛场景:N=606,残疾场景:N=628)中有应答的人群中,探讨了对 LPT 的个体偏好趋势,并且使用系列横断面设计,在整个样本中(波次 2 中为 1702 名老年人,波次 8 中为 4342 名老年人)探讨了 LPT 的国家趋势。

结果

在队列研究中,个体偏好随着时间的推移保持稳定(残疾场景的总体一致性为 86%,疼痛场景的总体一致性为 76%),特别是在波次 2 中拒绝 LPT 的老年人(残疾场景的总体一致性为 92%,疼痛场景的总体一致性为 86%)。在系列横断面研究中,疼痛(27.4%比 27.0%,P=0.80)和残疾(15.8%比 15.7%,P=0.99)场景中,LPT 接受偏好的国家趋势随着时间的推移保持稳定。

结论

我们发现,临终治疗偏好的国家趋势并没有随着时间的推移发生实质性变化,并且在个体老年人中可能是稳定的。

相似文献

1
National End-of-Life-Treatment Preferences are Stable Over Time: National Health and Aging Trends Study.国家临终治疗偏好随时间保持稳定:国家健康与老龄化趋势研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Oct;64(4):e189-e194. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Two-thirds of older people is interested in information meetings on end-of life care to stimulate advance care planning: a national survey.三分之二的老年人对关于临终关怀的信息会议感兴趣,以促进预先护理规划:一项全国性调查。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06231-x.
6
Public preferences for health and non-health outcomes of Universal Basic Income and alternative income-based policies: A mixed-method feasibility study.公众对普遍基本收入和其他基于收入的政策的健康与非健康结果的偏好:一项混合方法可行性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul 30:1-26. doi: 10.3310/ALDS8846.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.
10
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
What's Wrong With Advance Care Planning?预先护理规划存在什么问题?
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1575-1576. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16430.
2
Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel.为成年人定义预先护理计划:多学科德尔菲专家组的共识定义
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):821-832.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
3
Low Completion and Disparities in Advance Care Planning Activities Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries.老年医疗保险受益人中预先护理计划活动的低完成率和差异
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1872-1875. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6751.
4
The Natural History of Changes in Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatments and Implications for Inpatient Mortality in Younger and Older Hospitalized Adults.维持生命治疗偏好变化的自然史及其对年轻和老年住院成年人住院死亡率的影响
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 May;64(5):981-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14048. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
5
The Remarkable Staying Power of "Death Panels".“死亡小组”惊人的持久影响力。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Oct;40(5):1087-101. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3161212. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
6
Stability of end-of-life preferences: a systematic review of the evidence.临终偏好的稳定性:证据的系统综述
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1085-92. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1183.
7
Stages of change for the component behaviors of advance care planning.预先医疗照护计划各组成行为的改变阶段。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Dec;58(12):2329-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03184.x.
8
Using the experiences of bereaved caregivers to inform patient- and caregiver-centered advance care planning.利用丧亲照护者的经验为以患者和照护者为中心的预先护理计划提供信息。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct;23(10):1602-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0748-0. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
9
Inconsistency over time in the preferences of older persons with advanced illness for life-sustaining treatment.晚期疾病老年人对维持生命治疗的偏好随时间的不一致性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jul;55(7):1007-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01232.x.
10
Changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among older persons with advanced illness.晚期疾病老年患者维持生命治疗偏好的变化。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Apr;22(4):495-501. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0104-9.