• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烧伤患者转诊标准的依从性;一项系统评价。

Adherence to Referral Criteria for Burn Patients; a Systematic Review.

作者信息

Bazzi Ali, Ghazanfari Mohammad Javad, Norouzi Masoumeh, Mobayen Mohammadreza, Jafaraghaee Fateme, Emami Zeydi Amir, Osuji Joseph, Karkhah Samad

机构信息

Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Burn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 2;10(1):e43. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1534. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1534
PMID:35765610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9206830/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Burn injuries are under-appreciated trauma, associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. It is necessary to refer patients in need of specialized care to more specialized centers for treatment and rehabilitation of burn injuries. This systematic review aimed to assess the adherence to referral criteria for burn patients.

METHODS

An extensive search was conducted on Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science online databases using the relevant keywords from the earliest to October 7, 2021. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies (AXIS tool).

RESULTS

Among a total of 7,455 burn patients included in the nine studies, 60.95% were male. The most frequently burned areas were the hands (n=3) and the face (n=2). The most and least common burn mechanisms were scalds (62.76%) and electrical or chemical (2.88%), respectively. 51.88% of burn patients had met ≥ 1 referral criteria. The overall adherence to the referral criteria for burn patients was 58.28% (17.37 to 93.39%). The highest and lowest adherence rates were related to Western Cape Provincial (WCP) (26.70%) and National Burn Care Review (NBCR) (4.97%) criteria, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The overall adherence to the referral criteria for burn patients was relatively desirable. Therefore, well-designed future studies are suggested in order to uncover approaches to improve adherence to referral criteria for burn patients.

摘要

引言

烧伤是一种未得到充分重视的创伤,会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。有必要将需要专科护理的患者转至更专业的中心,以接受烧伤治疗和康复。本系统评价旨在评估烧伤患者转诊标准的依从性。

方法

使用相关关键词,在Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science在线数据库中进行了广泛检索,检索时间从最早到2021年10月7日。使用横断面研究评估工具(AXIS工具)对纳入研究的质量进行评估。

结果

在九项研究纳入的总共7455例烧伤患者中,60.95%为男性。最常烧伤的部位是手部(n=3)和面部(n=2)。最常见和最不常见的烧伤机制分别是烫伤(62.76%)和电击或化学烧伤(2.88%)。51.88%的烧伤患者符合≥1条转诊标准。烧伤患者转诊标准的总体依从率为58.28%(17.37%至93.39%)。最高和最低依从率分别与西开普省(WCP)标准(26.70%)和国家烧伤护理审查(NBCR)标准(4.97%)相关。

结论

烧伤患者转诊标准的总体依从性相对较好。因此,建议开展精心设计的未来研究,以发现提高烧伤患者转诊标准依从性的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c086/9206830/70596bece244/aaem-10-e43-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c086/9206830/70596bece244/aaem-10-e43-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c086/9206830/70596bece244/aaem-10-e43-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Adherence to Referral Criteria for Burn Patients; a Systematic Review.烧伤患者转诊标准的依从性;一项系统评价。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 2;10(1):e43. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1534. eCollection 2022.
2
Adherence to the emergency management of severe burns referral criteria in burn patients admitted to a hospital with or without a specialized burn center.在有或没有专门烧伤中心的医院中,烧伤患者入院时是否遵循严重烧伤转诊标准的紧急管理。
Burns. 2021 Dec;47(8):1810-1817. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
3
Adherence to burn center referral criteria: are patients appropriately being referred?对烧伤中心转诊标准的依从性:患者是否得到了恰当的转诊?
J Burn Care Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):26-30. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181cb8efb.
4
Clinical decision-support for acute burn referral and triage at specialized centres - Contribution from routine and digital health tools.临床决策支持在急性烧伤专科中心的转诊和分诊中的应用——常规和数字健康工具的贡献。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2067389. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2067389.
5
Caregivers' knowledge with burned children and related factors towards burn first aid: A systematic review.照顾者对烧伤儿童的知识及与烧伤急救相关的因素:系统评价。
Int Wound J. 2023 Sep;20(7):2887-2897. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14130. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
6
A systematic review of life satisfaction and related factors among burns patients.一项针对烧伤患者生活满意度及相关因素的系统评价。
Int Wound J. 2023 Sep;20(7):2830-2842. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14120. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
7
A systematic review of social support and related factors among burns patients.烧伤患者社会支持及相关因素的系统评价
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3349-3361. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14166. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
8
Adherence to National Burn Care Review referral criteria in a paediatric Emergency Department.遵守国家烧伤护理审查转诊标准在儿科急诊室。
Burns. 2010 Dec;36(8):1165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 May 21.
9
Burn Center Referral Practice Evaluation and Treatment Outcomes Comparison Among Verified, Nonverified Burn Centers, and Nonburn Centers: A Statewide Perspective.烧伤中心转诊实践评估及验证烧伤中心、未验证烧伤中心与非烧伤中心治疗结局比较:全州视角。
J Burn Care Res. 2021 May 7;42(3):439-447. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa167.
10
Adherence to Referral Criteria at Admission and Patient Management at a Specialized Burns Centre: The Case of the Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa.南非开普敦红十字会战争纪念儿童医院在烧伤专科医院的入院转诊标准遵循及患者管理情况
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 6;14(7):732. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070732.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Herbal Bioactive Compounds on the Angiogenic Factors and Modulation of Inflammatory Mediators in the Patients with the Deep Second-Degree Burn: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial.草药生物活性化合物对深二度烧伤患者血管生成因子及炎症介质调节的影响:一项单盲随机临床试验
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2025 Jan 28;39:16. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.39.16. eCollection 2025.
2
Post-traumatic growth and its explanatory factors in burn patients: A systematic review.烧伤患者的创伤后成长及其影响因素:系统评价。
Int Wound J. 2024 Oct;21(10):e70066. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70066.
3
Chemical burn wounds as a risk factor for gastric cancer: in-silico analyses-experimental research.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of cell appendages for the management of burn wounds.细胞附属器在烧伤创面处理中的应用。
Burns. 2022 Aug;48(5):1272-1273. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 7.
2
Exercise as a rehabilitation intervention for severe burn survivors: Benefits & barriers.运动作为重度烧伤幸存者的康复干预措施:益处与障碍
Burns. 2022 Aug;48(5):1269-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.04.016. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
Intraoperative three-dimensional bioprinting: A transformative technology for burn wound reconstruction.术中三维生物打印:烧伤创面重建的变革性技术。
化学性烧伤创面作为胃癌的一个危险因素:计算机模拟分析-实验研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Jul 17;86(9):5162-5169. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002240. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Prediction of immune molecules activity during burn wound healing among elderly patients: in-silico analyses: experimental research.老年患者烧伤创面愈合过程中免疫分子活性的预测:计算机模拟分析:实验研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Apr 16;86(7):3972-3983. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002055. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Prevalence of anxiety and its risk factors in burn patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.烧伤患者焦虑的患病率及其危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Feb;21(2):e14705. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14705.
6
Antibiofilm and antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus cell free supernatant against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wounds.乳酸菌无细胞上清液对烧伤创面分离的铜绿假单胞菌的抗生物膜和抗菌活性。
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4112-4121. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14305. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
7
Prevalence of non-accidental burns and related factors in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童非意外伤害性烧伤的患病率及相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3855-3870. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14236. Epub 2023 May 24.
8
Perceived stigmatisation and reliability of questionnaire in the survivors with burns wound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.烧伤幸存者感知的污名化和问卷的可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3391-3403. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14176. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
9
A systematic review of medical science students' knowledge and related factors towards burns first aids.医学专业学生烧伤急救知识及相关因素的系统评价
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3380-3390. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14174. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
10
A systematic review of social support and related factors among burns patients.烧伤患者社会支持及相关因素的系统评价
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3349-3361. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14166. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
Burns. 2022 Jun;48(4):1023-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.03.014. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
4
Machine learning for burned wound management.用于烧伤创面管理的机器学习
Burns. 2022 Aug;48(5):1261-1262. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
5
Antibiotics as a two-edged sword: The probability of endotoxemia during burned wound treatment.抗生素:一把双刃剑——烧伤创面治疗期间发生内毒素血症的可能性
Burns. 2022 May;48(3):730-731. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.02.012. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
6
Machine learning for burns clinical care: Opportunities & challenges.用于烧伤临床护理的机器学习:机遇与挑战。
Burns. 2022 May;48(3):734-735. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
7
Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on burns care.2019年冠状病毒病疫情对烧伤护理的影响。
Burns. 2022 Jun;48(4):1020-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.01.020. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
8
Adherence of Burn Outpatient Clinic Referrals to ABA Criteria in a Tertiary Center: Creating Unnecessary Referrals?烧伤门诊转诊至三级中心遵循 ABA 标准的情况:是否造成了不必要的转诊?
J Burn Care Res. 2021 Nov 24;42(6):1275-1279. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab117.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
10
Adherence to the emergency management of severe burns referral criteria in burn patients admitted to a hospital with or without a specialized burn center.在有或没有专门烧伤中心的医院中,烧伤患者入院时是否遵循严重烧伤转诊标准的紧急管理。
Burns. 2021 Dec;47(8):1810-1817. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.02.023. Epub 2021 Mar 1.