Suppr超能文献

比较化学发光免疫分析法和液相色谱-串联质谱法在儿童血清总 25-羟维生素 D 浓度中的应用。

Comparison of the Serum Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Using Chemiluminescent Immunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Children.

机构信息

Department of Transfusion, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University.

Wuxi App Tech Co., Ltd.

出版信息

J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2022;68(3):181-188. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.68.181.

Abstract

We aimed to assess the difference and agreement between the CL-series Vitamin D Total assay (Mindray), which was a kind of chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in the measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations in children. We compared the 25(OH)D concentrations of 92 children using the CLIA and LC-MS/MS. Paired samples t-test was used to compare the two groups. Linear regression was used to show the correlation between CLIA and LC-MS/MS. The difference and bias between 2 methods were revealed in Bland-Altman plot. Agreement in classification of deficiency between CLIA and LC-MS/MS was assessed using Cohen's Kappa. p value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Using Shapiro-Wilk Test to assess whether the data follows a normal distribution. Using 95% children's serum 25(OH)D concentrations by LC-MS/MS as the reference interval. The regression equation was CLIA=1.185×LC-MS/MS-3.328. The fitness adjusted r was 0.589. The CLIA showed positive bias compared to LC-MS/MS, p<0.05, bias=(1.94±16.56) ng/mL. Cohen's Kappa=0.53, p<0.001. The agreement of 2 methods in diagnosing "deficiency" was good. According to Shapiro-Wilk Test, the data followed a normal distribution (W=0.99). The reference interval of children's serum 25(OH)D concentrations by LC-MS/MS was 11.35-44.57 ng/mL. In measuring 25(OH)D concentration of children, CLIA represented higher levels than LC-MS/MS. The two methods were consistent in diagnosing vitamin D deficiency. The reference interval of children's serum 25(OH)D concentrations by LC-MS/MS was 11.35-44.57 ng/mL in our area in summer.

摘要

我们旨在评估 CL 系列维生素 D 总检测试剂盒(迈瑞)与液相色谱串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)在测量儿童血清 25-羟维生素 D [25(OH)D]浓度方面的差异和一致性。我们比较了 92 名儿童使用 CLIA 和 LC-MS/MS 的 25(OH)D 浓度。采用配对样本 t 检验比较两组数据。采用线性回归显示 CLIA 与 LC-MS/MS 的相关性。采用 Bland-Altman 图显示两种方法之间的差异和偏差。采用 Cohen's Kappa 评估 CLIA 和 LC-MS/MS 在缺乏分类方面的一致性。p 值<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。采用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验评估数据是否符合正态分布。采用 95%儿童血清 25(OH)D 浓度 LC-MS/MS 作为参考区间。回归方程为 CLIA=1.185×LC-MS/MS-3.328。拟合调整后的 r 值为 0.589。CLIA 与 LC-MS/MS 相比显示出正偏差,p<0.05,偏差=(1.94±16.56)ng/mL。Cohen's Kappa=0.53,p<0.001。两种方法在诊断“缺乏”方面的一致性较好。根据 Shapiro-Wilk 检验,数据呈正态分布(W=0.99)。LC-MS/MS 检测儿童血清 25(OH)D 浓度的参考区间为 11.35-44.57ng/mL。在测量儿童 25(OH)D 浓度方面,CLIA 显示的水平高于 LC-MS/MS。两种方法在诊断维生素 D 缺乏方面一致。在本地区夏季,LC-MS/MS 检测儿童血清 25(OH)D 浓度的参考区间为 11.35-44.57ng/mL。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验