• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑死亡后器官捐赠强制选择系统在数学模型中的伦理合法性及潜在效果

The effect of a mandatory choice systemfor organ donation after brain death onethical legitimacy and potential efficacyin a mathematical model.

作者信息

Cho In Soo, Lee Hyun Yong, Park Ui Jun, Kim Hyoung Tae, Roh Young-Nam

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

Division of Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Transplant. 2020 Mar 31;34(1):2-7. doi: 10.4285/kjt.2020.34.1.2.

DOI:10.4285/kjt.2020.34.1.2
PMID:35770263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9188930/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The "mandatory choice" system is an organ donation system that forces individuals to clearly express their choice about organ donation. Although this system is widely practiced in western countries, it has not yet been implemented in many Asian countries. This study aimed to compare the possible outcomes of a mandatory choice system and the current system in Korea.

METHODS

A mathematical model was used to predict outcomes under each system. A structured questionnaire assuming two systems (current opt-in and mandatory choice) was developed to investigate participants' decisions on organ donation and the family's consent after brain death in each system. Participants who enrolled in this survey were 100 couples (200 people).

RESULTS

The total number of donors decreased slightly from 102 (51.0%) in the current opt-in system to 93 (46.5%) in the mandatory choice system. The rate of achieving autonomy was increased from 62.5% (125/200) in the current system to 68.0% (136/200) in the mandatory choice system. The achievement of negative autonomy was relatively higher in the mandatory choice system (73.6% [67/91] vs. 63.2% [55/87]).

CONCLUSIONS

The mandatory choice system can supplement the weak ethical point of the current system by increasing the achievement of autonomy.

摘要

背景

“强制选择”系统是一种迫使个人明确表达其器官捐赠选择的器官捐赠系统。尽管该系统在西方国家广泛实行,但在许多亚洲国家尚未实施。本研究旨在比较韩国强制选择系统和现行系统可能产生的结果。

方法

使用数学模型预测每个系统下的结果。设计了一份假设两种系统(现行选择加入和强制选择)的结构化问卷,以调查参与者在每个系统中关于器官捐赠的决定以及脑死亡后家属的同意情况。参与本次调查的是100对夫妇(200人)。

结果

捐赠者总数略有下降,从现行选择加入系统中的102人(51.0%)降至强制选择系统中的93人(46.5%)。自主达成率从现行系统中的62.5%(125/200)提高到强制选择系统中的68.0%(136/200)。在强制选择系统中,消极自主的达成相对较高(73.6% [67/91] 对63.2% [55/87])。

结论

强制选择系统可以通过提高自主达成率来补充现行系统薄弱的伦理要点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f715/9188930/ed09b9ebcf40/KJT-34-1-002-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f715/9188930/ed09b9ebcf40/KJT-34-1-002-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f715/9188930/ed09b9ebcf40/KJT-34-1-002-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of a mandatory choice systemfor organ donation after brain death onethical legitimacy and potential efficacyin a mathematical model.脑死亡后器官捐赠强制选择系统在数学模型中的伦理合法性及潜在效果
Korean J Transplant. 2020 Mar 31;34(1):2-7. doi: 10.4285/kjt.2020.34.1.2.
2
Effect of Opt-out System for Organ Donation After Brain Death on Ethical Legitimacy and Potential Efficacy in a Mathematical Model.脑死亡后器官捐献选择退出系统对数学模型中伦理合法性和潜在功效的影响。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2020 Oct;18(5):626-632. doi: 10.6002/ect.2019.0420. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
3
'It's like being conscripted, one volunteer is better than 10 pressed men': A qualitative study into the views of people who plan to opt-out of organ donation.“这就像被征召入伍一样,一个自愿者比 10 个被迫入伍的人要好”:对计划选择退出器官捐献的人的观点的定性研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):257-274. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12406. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
4
An Ethical Defense of a Mandated Choice Consent Procedure for Deceased Organ Donation.已故器官捐赠强制选择同意程序的伦理辩护
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2022 Apr 29;14(3):259-270. doi: 10.1007/s41649-022-00206-5. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
General public's view on opt-in, opt-out, and mandated choice organ donation policies: a qualitative study involving Swiss French-speaking citizens favourably disposed towards organ donation.公众对选择加入、选择退出和强制选择器官捐赠政策的看法:一项涉及对器官捐赠持积极态度的瑞士法语区公民的定性研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Nov 6;151:w30037. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.w30037. eCollection 2021 Nov 8.
6
Australian Perspectives on Opt-In and Opt-Out Consent Systems for Deceased Organ Donation.澳大利亚对已故器官捐赠的选择加入和选择退出同意系统的看法。
Prog Transplant. 2021 Dec;31(4):357-367. doi: 10.1177/15269248211046023. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
7
Recovery of transplantable organs after cardiac or circulatory death: transforming the paradigm for the ethics of organ donation.心脏死亡或循环死亡后可移植器官的恢复:转变器官捐赠伦理范式
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2007 May 22;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-2-8.
8
Non-therapeutic intensive care for organ donation: A healthcare professionals' opinion survey.用于器官捐献的非治疗性重症监护:一项医疗保健专业人员意见调查。
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Mar;23(2):191-202. doi: 10.1177/0969733014558969. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
9
Who are the donors in organ donation? The family's perspective in mandated choice.器官捐赠中的捐赠者是谁?家庭在强制选择中的观点。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jul 1;125(1):70-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-1-199607010-00011.
10
'If I donate my organs it's a gift, if you take them it's theft': a qualitative study of planned donor decisions under opt-out legislation.“如果我捐献器官,那是一份礼物;如果你们拿走,那就是盗窃”:一项关于默认捐献立法下计划捐献者决策的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):1463. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7774-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Global transplantation: Lessons from organ transplantation organizations worldwide.全球移植:来自全球器官移植组织的经验教训。
World J Transplant. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):99683. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i1.99683.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of phased education on attitudes toward organ donation and willingness to donate after brain death in an Asian country.分阶段教育对亚洲国家脑死亡后器官捐献态度和意愿的影响。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):256-266. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 May 24.
2
Factors influencing the family consent rate for organ donation in the UK.影响英国器官捐献家庭同意率的因素。
Anaesthesia. 2016 Sep;71(9):1053-63. doi: 10.1111/anae.13535. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
3
Current progress in public health models addressing the critical organ shortage.
当前解决关键器官短缺问题的公共卫生模型的进展。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1363-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
4
Comparing the effects of defaults in organ donation systems.比较器官捐赠系统中默认设置的效果。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Apr;106:137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.052. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
5
Nudge, nudge or shove, shove-the right way for nudges to increase the supply of donated cadaver organs.轻推、轻推还是猛推——推动捐献尸体器官供应量增加的正确方式。
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(2):32-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634484.
6
The potential impact of an opt-out system for organ donation in the UK.英国选择退出式器官捐赠制度的潜在影响。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Sep;36(9):534-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.031757.
7
Perceived support among families deciding about organ donation for their loved ones: donor vs nondonor next of kin.家属在决定是否捐献亲人器官时的感知支持:供者与非供者的近亲属。
Am J Crit Care. 2010 Sep;19(5):e52-61. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010396.
8
Producing organ donors.制造器官捐献者。
J Econ Perspect. 2007 Summer;21(3):25-36. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.3.25.
9
Modifiable factors influencing relatives' decision to offer organ donation: systematic review.影响亲属决定提供器官捐赠的可改变因素:系统评价
BMJ. 2009 Apr 21;338:b991. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b991.
10
The reasons families donate organs for transplantation: implications for policy and practice.家庭捐赠器官用于移植的原因:对政策和实践的影响。
J Trauma. 2007 Apr;62(4):969-78. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000205220.24003.51.