Suppr超能文献

已故器官捐赠强制选择同意程序的伦理辩护

An Ethical Defense of a Mandated Choice Consent Procedure for Deceased Organ Donation.

作者信息

Symons Xavier, Poulden Billy

机构信息

Plunkett Centre for Ethics, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW Australia.

The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Australia.

出版信息

Asian Bioeth Rev. 2022 Apr 29;14(3):259-270. doi: 10.1007/s41649-022-00206-5. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Organ transplant shortages are ubiquitous in healthcare systems around the world. In response, several commentators have argued for the adoption of an opt-out policy for organ transplantation, whereby individuals would by default be registered as organ donors unless they informed authorities of their desire to opt-out. This may potentially lead to an increase in donation rates. An opt-out system, however, presumes consent even when it is evident that a significant minority are resistant to organ donation. In this article, we defend a mandated choice framework for consent to deceased organ donation. A mandated choice framework, coupled with good public education, would likely increase donation rates. More importantly, however, a mandated choice framework would respect the autonomous preferences of people who do not wish to donate. We focus in particular on the Australian healthcare context, and consider how a mandated choice system could function as an ethical means to increase the organ donation rate in Australia. We make the novel proposal that all individuals who vote at an Australian federal election be required to state their organ donation preferences when voting.

摘要

器官移植短缺在世界各地的医疗系统中普遍存在。对此,一些评论家主张采用器官移植的选择退出政策,即除非个人告知当局其选择退出的意愿,否则默认将其登记为器官捐赠者。这可能会导致捐赠率上升。然而,选择退出系统即使在明显有相当一部分人抵制器官捐赠的情况下也假定存在同意。在本文中,我们捍卫一种关于死后器官捐赠同意的强制选择框架。一个强制选择框架,再加上良好的公众教育,可能会提高捐赠率。然而,更重要的是,一个强制选择框架将尊重那些不想捐赠的人的自主偏好。我们特别关注澳大利亚的医疗环境,并考虑强制选择系统如何能够作为一种道德手段来提高澳大利亚的器官捐赠率。我们提出一个新颖的建议,即所有在澳大利亚联邦选举中投票的个人在投票时都必须表明其器官捐赠偏好。

相似文献

1
An Ethical Defense of a Mandated Choice Consent Procedure for Deceased Organ Donation.已故器官捐赠强制选择同意程序的伦理辩护
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2022 Apr 29;14(3):259-270. doi: 10.1007/s41649-022-00206-5. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Opt-out, mandated choice and informed consent.选择退出、强制选择和知情同意。
Bioethics. 2023 Nov;37(9):862-868. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13228. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
7
Opt-out defaults do not increase organ donation rates.选择退出默认选项并不会提高器官捐献率。
Public Health. 2024 Nov;236:436-440. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.08.009. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

2
What blood and organ donation can tell us about cooperation?血液和器官捐献能告诉我们什么是合作?
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:202-207. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
4
Assessing Global Organ Donation Policies: Opt-In vs Opt-Out.评估全球器官捐赠政策:选择加入与选择退出。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 May 13;14:1985-1998. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S270234. eCollection 2021.
5
Nudging to donate organs: do what you like or like what we do?推动器官捐献:做你喜欢的还是喜欢我们做的?
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Sep;24(3):329-340. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10007-6. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
10
Underlying wishes and nudged choices.潜在愿望与引导性选择。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2018 Dec;24(4):459-475. doi: 10.1037/xap0000183. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验