NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; CHRC, NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; CINTESIS, NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; CHRC, NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Clin Nutr. 2022 Aug;41(8):1660-1666. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.06.021. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although intermittent energy restriction (IER) seems to be as effective as continuous energy restriction (CER) for weight loss, there is still a need to determine the putative effect of this strategy upon the metabolic-inflammatory status. This study aimed to compare the effects of IER versus CER on cardiometabolic and inflammatory markers, over a 12-week period, in adults with obesity.
Twenty-eight Norwegian adults (20-55 years) with obesity [body mass index: 35.4 (3.7) kg/m] from a clinical trial (NCT02169778) who completed a 12-weeks diet-induced weight loss as IER (n = 14) or CER (n = 14) were included in this study. Cardiometabolic, adipokines and inflammatory markers were evaluated at baseline and after the intervention. Plasma levels of 13 inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (IL-1β, IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17A, IL-18, IL-23, and IL-33) and 4 adipokines (adiponectin, adipsin, leptin and resistin) were measured through multiplex bead-based flow cytometric immunoassays.
Both interventions resulted in comparable reductions in fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, lipid profile biomarkers, and adipokines. There were significant differences in HOMA-IR between interventions, with a more pronounced reduction in the IER group (-3.7 vs -1.6, P = 0.040). Inflammatory cytokines and chemokines decreased significantly in the IER group only. Differences in the relative changes of IL-1β (-48.5 vs 58.2%, P = 0.011), IFN-γ (-53.2 vs 45.1%, P = 0.023), MCP-1 (-22.0 vs 17.4%, P = 0.023), IL-18 (-40.8 vs 10.1%, P = 0.019), IL-23 (-64.8 vs 44.0%, P = 0.011) and IL-33 (-53.4 vs 35.7%, P = 0.028) were statistically significant between groups, with improvements in the inflammatory profile in the IER group.
Our results suggest that a 12-weeks intermittent energy restriction, in comparison to a continuous energy strategy, could be advantageous to reduce inflammation associated with obesity, and consequently improve insulin resistance, regardless of the amount of weight loss. Registered under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier no. NCT02169778.
尽管间歇性能量限制(IER)在减肥方面似乎与连续能量限制(CER)一样有效,但仍需要确定这种策略对代谢炎症状态的潜在影响。本研究旨在比较 IER 与 CER 对肥胖成年人在 12 周内的心脏代谢和炎症标志物的影响。
本研究纳入了 28 名来自一项临床试验(NCT02169778)的挪威肥胖成年人(20-55 岁,体重指数:35.4(3.7)kg/m),他们完成了为期 12 周的饮食诱导减肥,其中 IER 组(n=14)或 CER 组(n=14)。在基线和干预后评估了心脏代谢、脂肪因子和炎症标志物。通过多重珠流式流式细胞术免疫测定法测量了 13 种炎症细胞因子和趋化因子(IL-1β、IFN-α、IFN-γ、TNF-α、MCP-1、IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、IL-12、IL-17A、IL-18、IL-23 和 IL-33)和 4 种脂肪因子(脂联素、adipsin、瘦素和抵抗素)的血浆水平。
两种干预措施均导致空腹血糖和胰岛素浓度、脂质谱生物标志物和脂肪因子的相似降低。IER 组的 HOMA-IR 存在显著差异,IER 组的降低更为明显(-3.7 与-1.6,P=0.040)。IER 组的炎症细胞因子和趋化因子仅显著降低。IL-1β(-48.5 与 58.2%,P=0.011)、IFN-γ(-53.2 与 45.1%,P=0.023)、MCP-1(-22.0 与 17.4%,P=0.023)、IL-18(-40.8 与 10.1%,P=0.019)、IL-23(-64.8 与 44.0%,P=0.011)和 IL-33(-53.4 与 35.7%,P=0.028)的相对变化之间存在统计学差异,IER 组的炎症谱有所改善。
我们的研究结果表明,与连续能量策略相比,12 周的间歇性能量限制可能有利于减轻与肥胖相关的炎症,从而改善胰岛素抵抗,而与体重减轻的量无关。在 ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符下注册为 NCT02169778。