Suppr超能文献

小学生福利脆弱性研究:英国布拉德福德的横断面研究。

Vulnerabilities in child well-being among primary school children: a cross-sectional study in Bradford, UK.

机构信息

Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 30;12(6):e049416. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049416.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of factors related to well-being among primary school children in a deprived multiethnic community in the UK.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Cross-sectional survey of 15 641 children aged 7-10 years in Born in Bradford's Primary School Years study: whole-classroom samples in 89 Bradford primary schools between 2016 and 2019.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence estimates by ethnicity (%, 95% CI) of single and multiple vulnerabilities in child well-being within and across four domains (Home, Family, Relationships; Material Resources; Friends and School; Subjective Well-being).

RESULTS

Only 10% of children had no vulnerabilities in any domain of well-being; 10% had one or more vulnerabilities in all four domains. The highest prevalence estimates were for being bullied some or all of the time (52.7%, 95% CI: 51.9% to 53.4%), keeping worries to oneself (31.2%, 95% CI: 30.5% to 31.9%), having no park near home (30.8%, 95% CI: 30.1% to 31.5%) and worrying all the time about how much money their family has (26.3%, 95% CI: 25.6% to 27%). Boys were consistently significantly more likely than girls to report all of the vulnerabilities in the Home, Family and Family Relationships domain, and the majority of indicators in the other domains, and in all domains except Friends and School, boys were significantly more likely to have at least one vulnerability. Girls were significantly more likely to report not having many friends (16.7%, 95% CI: 15.9% to 17.6% vs 12.5%, 95% CI: 11.8% to 13.2%), being bullied some or all of the time (55.8%, 95% CI: 54.7% to 56.9% vs 49.7%, 95% CI: 48.6% to 50.8%) and feeling left out all the time (12.1%, 95% CI: 11.4% to 12.8%) versus (10.3%, 95% CI: 9.7% to 11.0%). Variations in vulnerabilities by ethnicity were complex, with children in black, Asian and minority ethnic groups sometimes reporting more vulnerabilities and sometimes fewer than white British children. For example, compared with children of Pakistani heritage, white British children were more likely to say that their family never gets along well (6.3%, 95% CI: 5.6% to 7.1% vs 4.1%, 95% CI: 3.6% to 4.6%) and to have no access to the internet at home (22.3%, 95% CI: 21% to 23.6% vs 18%, 95% CI: 17% to 18.9%). Children with Pakistani heritage were more likely than white British children to say they had no park near their home where they can play with friends (32.7%, 95% CI: 31.6% to 33.9% vs 29.9%, 95% CI: 28.6% to 31.3%), to report not having three meals a day (17.9%, 95% CI: 16.9% to 18.8% vs 11.9%, 95% CI: 10.9% to 12.9%) and to worry all the time about how much money their families have (29.3%, 95% CI: 28.2% to 30.3%) vs (21.6%, 95% CI: 20.4% to 22.9%). Gypsy/Irish Traveller children were less likely than white British children to say they were bullied some or all of the time (42.2%, 95% CI: 35.4% to 49.4% vs 53.8%, 95% CI: 52.3% to 55.3%), but more likely to say they were mean to others all the time (9.9%, 95% CI: 6.3% to 15.2% vs 4%, 95% CI: 3.5% to 4.7%) and can never work out what to do when things are hard (15.2%, 95% CI: 10.6% to 21.2% vs 9%, 95% CI: 8.2% to 9.9%). We considered six vulnerabilities to be of particular concern during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated national and local lockdowns: family never gets along well together; no garden where child can play; no nearby park where they can play; not having three meals a day; no internet at home; worried about money all the time. Pre-pandemic, 37.4% (95% CI: 36.6% to 38.3%) of Bradford children had one of these vulnerabilities and a further 29.6% (95% CI: 28.9% to 30.4%) had more than one.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most primary school children aged 7-10 in our study had good levels of well-being on most indicators across multiple domains, fewer than 10% had no vulnerabilities at all, a worrying 10% had at least one vulnerability in all the four domains we studied and two-thirds had vulnerabilities of particular concern during the COVID-19 lockdowns.

摘要

目的

描述英国一个贫困的多族裔社区中,小学生的幸福相关因素的流行情况。

设计和参与者

2016 年至 2019 年在布拉德福德的小学年间研究中对 15641 名 7-10 岁的儿童进行了横断面调查:89 所布拉德福德小学的整班样本。

主要结果测量

在家庭、家庭关系、物质资源、朋友和学校、主观幸福感这四个领域内和跨领域,按种族(%,95%置信区间)描述儿童幸福感的单一和多重脆弱性的流行率估计。

结果

只有 10%的儿童在任何一个幸福感领域都没有脆弱性;10%的儿童在所有四个领域都有一个或多个脆弱性。最高的流行率估计是经常被欺负(52.7%,95%置信区间:51.9%至 53.4%)、独自担忧(31.2%,95%置信区间:30.5%至 31.9%)、家附近没有公园(30.8%,95%置信区间:30.1%至 31.5%)和一直担心家里的钱(26.3%,95%置信区间:25.6%至 27%)。男孩在家庭、家庭和家庭关系领域,以及其他大多数领域的所有脆弱性,以及除朋友和学校之外的所有领域,都比女孩更频繁地报告所有脆弱性,而且男孩更有可能至少有一个脆弱性。女孩更有可能报告没有很多朋友(16.7%,95%置信区间:15.9%至 17.6%比 12.5%,95%置信区间:11.8%至 13.2%)、经常被欺负(55.8%,95%置信区间:54.7%至 56.9%比 49.7%,95%置信区间:48.6%至 50.8%)和总是被冷落(12.1%,95%置信区间:11.4%至 12.8%),而男孩的这三个指标分别为(10.3%,95%置信区间:9.7%至 11.0%)。脆弱性按种族的差异是复杂的,黑人、亚裔和少数族裔群体的儿童有时报告的脆弱性更多,有时则更少。例如,与有巴基斯坦血统的白人英国儿童相比,白人英国儿童更有可能说他们的家人相处不好(6.3%,95%置信区间:5.6%至 7.1%比 4.1%,95%置信区间:3.6%至 4.6%),并且家里没有互联网(22.3%,95%置信区间:21%至 23.6%比 18%,95%置信区间:17%至 18.9%)。有巴基斯坦血统的儿童比白人英国儿童更有可能说他们家附近没有公园可以和朋友一起玩耍(32.7%,95%置信区间:31.6%至 33.9%比 29.9%,95%置信区间:28.6%至 31.3%)、不能每天吃三顿饭(17.9%,95%置信区间:16.9%至 18.8%比 11.9%,95%置信区间:10.9%至 12.9%)和一直担心家里的钱(29.3%,95%置信区间:28.2%至 30.3%比 21.6%,95%置信区间:20.4%至 22.9%)。吉普赛/爱尔兰旅行者的孩子比白人英国孩子更不可能经常被欺负(42.2%,95%置信区间:35.4%至 49.4%比 53.8%,95%置信区间:52.3%至 55.3%),但更有可能一直对别人刻薄(9.9%,95%置信区间:6.3%至 15.2%比 4%,95%置信区间:3.5%至 4.7%)和遇到困难时永远不知道该做什么(15.2%,95%置信区间:10.6%至 21.2%比 9%,95%置信区间:8.2%至 9.9%)。我们认为,在 COVID-19 大流行及其相关的国家和地方封锁期间,有六个脆弱性特别值得关注:家人相处不好;孩子不能玩耍的花园;附近没有孩子可以玩耍的公园;不能每天吃三顿饭;家里没有互联网;一直担心钱。大流行前,布拉德福德的 37.4%(95%置信区间:36.6%至 38.3%)的儿童有一个这样的脆弱性,另有 29.6%(95%置信区间:28.9%至 30.4%)有多个这样的脆弱性。

结论

尽管我们研究中的大多数 7-10 岁的小学生在大多数幸福感指标上都有良好的水平,但是,不到 10%的儿童完全没有脆弱性,有 10%的儿童在我们研究的四个领域中至少有一个脆弱性,还有三分之二的儿童在 COVID-19 封锁期间存在特别值得关注的脆弱性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21cb/9247690/27d15685fb36/bmjopen-2021-049416f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验