Suppr超能文献

感染性心内膜炎合并急性脑梗死的外科治疗——使用改良Rankin量表和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的术前管理

Surgical Management of Infective Endocarditis Complicated With Acute Cerebral Infarction - Preoperative Management Using Modified Rankin Scale and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score.

作者信息

Maze Yasumi, Tokui Toshiya, Murakami Masahiko, Inoue Ryosai, Hirano Koji, Toyoshima Hirokazu

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ise Red Cross Hospital Ise Japan.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Ise Red Cross Hospital Ise Japan.

出版信息

Circ Rep. 2022 Apr 29;4(6):248-254. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0038. eCollection 2022 Jun 10.

Abstract

The optimal timing of surgery for infective endocarditis (IE) with acute cerebral infarction (CI) remains controversial. We examined the surgery policy at Ise Red Cross Hospital after negative blood cultures and antibiotic administration for at least 2 weeks. Thirty-nine IE patients who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2020 were divided into Groups S (n=13; with acute CI) and N (n=26; without acute CI). Patients with IE who underwent conservative treatment were classified as group C (n=16). At the time of IE diagnosis, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was significantly higher in Group S than Group N (mean [±SD] 3.9±0.6 vs. 2.8±1.3; P=0.009). However, there was no significant difference between Groups S and N moments before surgery (3.0±1.5 vs. 2.1±1.5, respectively; P=0.10) or at discharge (2.7±0.8 vs. 2.6±0.9, respectively; P=0.89). There were no significant differences in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between groups. There were no differences in intra- and postoperative outcomes between Groups S and N. In Group C, the mRS score was significantly higher at discharge than in Group S (2.7±0.8 vs. 4.4±0.8, respectively; P<0.001), and long-term results were poor (P=0.004). Preoperative management and the timing of surgery for IE patients using the mRS and SOFA scores at our institution were reasonable.

摘要

感染性心内膜炎(IE)合并急性脑梗死(CI)时的最佳手术时机仍存在争议。我们在血培养阴性且使用抗生素至少2周后,对伊势红十字医院的手术策略进行了研究。2012年至2020年间接受手术的39例IE患者被分为S组(n = 13;合并急性CI)和N组(n = 26;无急性CI)。接受保守治疗的IE患者被归为C组(n = 16)。在IE诊断时,S组的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分显著高于N组(均值[±标准差]3.9±0.6 vs. 2.8±1.3;P = 0.009)。然而,S组和N组在手术前即刻(分别为3.0±1.5 vs. 2.1±1.5;P = 0.10)或出院时(分别为2.7±0.8 vs. 2.6±0.9;P = 0.89)并无显著差异。各组间序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分无显著差异。S组和N组在术中及术后结果方面无差异。在C组中,出院时的mRS评分显著高于S组(分别为2.7±0.8 vs. 4.4±0.8;P<0.001),且长期结果较差(P = 0.004)。在我们机构,使用mRS和SOFA评分对IE患者进行术前管理及确定手术时机是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/9168501/8273faaee3fb/circrep-4-248-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验