• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型冠状病毒检测试剂盒的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kits.

作者信息

Mulahuseinovic Naida, Salihefendic Lana, Durgut Selma, Kandic Enis, Konjhodzic Rijad

机构信息

Alea Genetic Center, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

Acta Inform Med. 2022 Jun;30(2):110-114. doi: 10.5455/aim.2022.30.110-114.

DOI:10.5455/aim.2022.30.110-114
PMID:35774833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9233452/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 is a coronavirus that causes a respiratory disease, COVID-19. For COVID-19 testing, real-time PCR is considered gold standard and therefore many commercial SARS-Cov-2 detection kits are available.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to determine diagnostic values of 10 different commercially available SARS-CoV-2 detection kits, based on their Ct value.

METHODS

For this study thirty clinical nasopharyngeal samples were collected in ALEA Genetic Center. Twenty four of them were positive, while six were negative and used as a negative control. Positive samples were selected based on the day when first symptoms appeared. RNA was extracted using the same extraction method for all samples. For amplification and comparison of detection kits, the same RT- PCR instrument was used.

RESULTS

Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and Cohen's kappa coefficient were estimated to evaluate diagnostic values of the tested kits. This study showed that all kits showed 100% specificity. Accuracy, sensitivity and kappa coefficient varied among examined assays. Based on clinical features, LabGun COVID-19 Assay by LabGenomics proved to be the most sensitive, the most accurate and most specific. Therefore this assay was used as a reference kit.

CONCLUSION

If things from practice are taken into account, accuracy and reliability of the tested commercial kits can vary compared to those obtained in this study where results were based on ideal functioning of the kits. When choosing the convenient commercial SARS-CoV-2 detection kit using RT-PCR method, many parameters need to be considered.

摘要

背景

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)是一种可引发呼吸道疾病——冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)的冠状病毒。对于COVID-19检测,实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)被视为金标准,因此有许多商用SARS-CoV-2检测试剂盒可供使用。

目的

本研究旨在根据10种不同商用SARS-CoV-2检测试剂盒的Ct值确定其诊断价值。

方法

本研究在阿莱亚基因中心收集了30份临床鼻咽样本。其中24份为阳性,6份为阴性,用作阴性对照。根据首次出现症状的日期选择阳性样本。所有样本均采用相同的提取方法提取RNA。对于检测试剂盒的扩增和比较,使用相同的逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)仪器。

结果

估计准确性、敏感性、特异性和科恩kappa系数以评估受试试剂盒的诊断价值。本研究表明,所有试剂盒的特异性均为100%。准确性、敏感性和kappa系数在各检测方法中有所不同。根据临床特征,LabGenomics公司的LabGun COVID-19检测试剂盒被证明是最敏感、最准确和最特异的。因此,该检测方法被用作参考试剂盒。

结论

如果考虑实际情况,受试商用试剂盒的准确性和可靠性可能与本研究结果有所不同,本研究结果基于试剂盒的理想运行情况。在选择方便的商用SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测试剂盒时,需要考虑许多参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c77/9233452/2740be8ab7e4/AIM-30-110-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c77/9233452/03a795b1463e/AIM-30-110-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c77/9233452/2740be8ab7e4/AIM-30-110-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c77/9233452/03a795b1463e/AIM-30-110-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c77/9233452/2740be8ab7e4/AIM-30-110-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kits.新型冠状病毒检测试剂盒的对比分析
Acta Inform Med. 2022 Jun;30(2):110-114. doi: 10.5455/aim.2022.30.110-114.
2
Comparison and Sensitivity Evaluation of Three Different Commercial Real-Time Quantitative PCR Kits for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.三种不同商业实时荧光定量 PCR 试剂盒用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的比较和敏感性评估。
Viruses. 2021 Jul 8;13(7):1321. doi: 10.3390/v13071321.
3
Performance verification of five commercial RT-qPCR diagnostic kits for SARS-CoV-2.五种用于 SARS-CoV-2 的商业 RT-qPCR 诊断试剂盒的性能验证。
Clin Chim Acta. 2022 Jan 15;525:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
4
[Evaluation of a Visually-Read Rapid Antigen Test Kit (SGA V-Chek) for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus].[用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒的视觉读取快速抗原检测试剂盒(SGA V-Chek)的评估]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2021 Jul;55(3):461-464. doi: 10.5578/mb.20219815.
5
Comparative performances of seven quantitative Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction assays (RT-qPCR) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in samples from individuals suspected of COVID-19 in São Paulo, Brazil.七种定量逆转录聚合酶链反应检测法(RT-qPCR)在巴西圣保罗对疑似新型冠状病毒肺炎患者样本中检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染的比较性能
J Clin Virol Plus. 2021 Jun;1(1):100012. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2021.100012. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
6
An Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Three COVID-19 Rapid Immunochromatographic Test Kits Compared to Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) Among Clinical Samples.三种新型冠状病毒肺炎快速免疫层析检测试剂盒与实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)相比在临床样本中的敏感性和特异性评估
Cureus. 2024 Jun 27;16(6):e63294. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63294. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
[Evaluation of the Rapid Antigen Detection Kit with the Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples].[用于呼吸道样本中检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的快速抗原检测试剂盒与聚合酶链反应的评估]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Apr;56(2):263-273. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229806.
8
Comparative effects of viral-transport-medium heat inactivation upon downstream SARS-CoV-2 detection in patient samples.比较病毒运输介质热失活对患者样本中 SARS-CoV-2 后续检测的影响。
J Med Microbiol. 2021 Mar;70(3). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001301. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
9
Comparison of seven commercial RT-PCR diagnostic kits for COVID-19.七种用于 COVID-19 的商业 RT-PCR 诊断试剂盒的比较。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104412. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104412. Epub 2020 May 8.
10
Evaluation of Three Multiplex Real-time Reverse Transcription PCR Assays for Simultaneous Detection of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A/B, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Nasopharyngeal Swabs.评价三种多重实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测试剂盒在鼻咽拭子标本中同时检测新型冠状病毒、甲型/乙型流感病毒和呼吸道合胞病毒的效果。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Dec 13;36(48):e328. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e328.

本文引用的文献

1
Engineering a Reliable and Convenient SARS-CoV-2 Replicon System for Analysis of Viral RNA Synthesis and Screening of Antiviral Inhibitors.工程化可靠便捷的 SARS-CoV-2 复制子系统,用于分析病毒 RNA 合成和筛选抗病毒抑制剂。
mBio. 2021 Jan 19;12(1):e02754-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02754-20.
2
Current methods for diagnosis of human coronaviruses: pros and cons.目前用于诊断人类冠状病毒的方法:优缺点。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021 Apr;413(9):2311-2330. doi: 10.1007/s00216-020-03046-0. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
3
Comparative Analysis of Primer-Probe Sets for RT-qPCR of COVID-19 Causative Virus (SARS-CoV-2).
新型冠状病毒肺炎致病病毒(严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2)逆转录定量聚合酶链反应引物-探针组的比较分析
ACS Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 11;6(9):2513-2523. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00464. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
4
SARS-CoV-2: characteristics and current advances in research.SARS-CoV-2:特性及研究进展。
Virol J. 2020 Jul 29;17(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01369-z.
5
Systematic review with meta-analysis of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for COVID-19.针对 COVID-19 的诊断测试准确性的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jan;49(1):21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
6
Risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission by aerosols, the rational use of masks, and protection of healthcare workers from COVID-19.气溶胶传播 SARS-CoV-2 的风险、口罩的合理使用以及保护医护人员免受 COVID-19 感染。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jul 6;9(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00763-0.
7
Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19.确定空气传播是 COVID-19 传播的主要途径。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 30;117(26):14857-14863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009637117. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
8
Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality.空气传播 SARS-CoV-2:全世界应正视现实。
Environ Int. 2020 Jun;139:105730. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105730. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
9
Droplets and Aerosols in the Transmission of SARS-CoV-2.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)传播中的飞沫和气溶胶
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2063. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2009324. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
An updated estimation of the risk of transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCov).新型冠状病毒(2019-nCov)传播风险的最新评估。
Infect Dis Model. 2020 Feb 11;5:248-255. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.02.001. eCollection 2020.