Research Program on Children and Global Adversity, François-Xavier Bagnoud (FXB) Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard School of Public Health, 651 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;51(12):1284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
We assessed the validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC) as a screen for depression in Rwandan children and adolescents. Although the CES-DC is widely used for depression screening in high-income countries, its validity in low-income and culturally diverse settings, including sub-Saharan Africa, is unknown.
The CES-DC was selected based on alignment with local expressions of depression-like problems in Rwandan children and adolescents. To examine criterion validity, we compared CES-DC scores to depression diagnoses on a structured diagnostic interview, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children (MINI KID), in a sample of 367 Rwandan children and adolescents aged 10 through 17 years. Caregiver and child or adolescent self-reports endorsing the presence of local depression-like problems agahinda kenshi (persistent sorrow) and kwiheba (severe hopelessness) were also examined for agreement with MINI KID diagnosis.
The CES-DC exhibited good internal reliability (α = .86) and test-retest reliability (r = .85). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the CES-DC was 0.825 when compared to MINI KID diagnoses, indicating a strong ability to distinguish between depressed and nondepressed children and adolescents in Rwanda. A cut point of≥30 corresponded with a sensitivity of 81.9% and a specificity of 71.9% in this referred sample. MINI KID diagnosis was well aligned with local expressions of depression-like problems.
The CES-DC demonstrates good psychometric properties for clinical screening and evaluation in Rwanda, and should be considered for use in this and other low-resource settings. Population samples are needed to determine a generalizable cut point in nonreferred samples.
我们评估了儿童流行病学研究抑郁量表(CES-DC)作为卢旺达儿童和青少年抑郁筛查工具的有效性。虽然 CES-DC 在高收入国家广泛用于抑郁筛查,但它在包括撒哈拉以南非洲在内的低收入和文化多样化环境中的有效性尚不清楚。
根据 CES-DC 与卢旺达儿童和青少年中类似抑郁问题的当地表现相一致的情况,选择了该量表。为了检验效标效度,我们在 367 名 10 至 17 岁的卢旺达儿童和青少年样本中,将 CES-DC 评分与结构化诊断访谈——儿童迷你国际神经精神访谈(MINI KID)的抑郁诊断进行了比较。还检查了照顾者和儿童或青少年报告的当地类似抑郁问题 agahinda kenshi(持续悲伤)和 kwiheba(极度绝望)与 MINI KID 诊断的一致性。
CES-DC 表现出良好的内部可靠性(α=0.86)和重测信度(r=0.85)。与 MINI KID 诊断相比,CES-DC 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.825,表明其在卢旺达区分抑郁和非抑郁儿童和青少年的能力较强。在该转诊样本中,得分≥30 对应的灵敏度为 81.9%,特异性为 71.9%。MINI KID 诊断与当地类似抑郁问题的表达高度一致。
CES-DC 在卢旺达具有良好的心理测量学特性,可用于临床筛查和评估,应考虑在这一和其他资源匮乏的环境中使用。需要进行人群样本研究,以确定在非转诊样本中具有普遍性的切点。