Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Jul 2;17(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00441-z.
Non-operative management (NOM) of blunt abdominal trauma has become increasingly common in hemodynamically stable patients. There are known complications of NOM from undrained intra-abdominal fluid accumulations including hemorrhage and peritonitis that require delayed operation. Thus, delayed operation can be considered as part of the overall management plan, instead of failure, of NOM. The aim of this scoping review is to establish key concepts regarding delayed laparoscopic peritoneal washout (DLPW) following NOM of blunt abdominal trauma patients.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and gray literature were systematically searched. Studies were included if they investigated or reported on the use of delayed laparoscopy involving peritoneal washout following NOM of blunt abdominal trauma patients. Bibliographies of included studies were manually reviewed to identify additional articles for inclusion.
From 910 citations, 28 studies met inclusion criteria. This included seven case reports, eleven case series or observational cohort studies, six review articles, two management guidelines, one textbook chapter, and one randomized clinical trial. For those reported, medium grade liver injuries proved most common (95.2%). Indications for DLPW were primarily clinical features and changes in imaging findings, highlighting the importance of close observation. Authors reported clinical improvement after DLPW regarding symptomatology, vital signs, and biochemistry. A relatively high transfusion demand was reported with a mean of four units of packed red blood cells pre-operatively. Length of stay and post-operative complications were consistent with previously reported experiences with blunt abdominal injuries.
DLPW is beneficial in blunt abdominal trauma patients following NOM with improvement in symptoms, SIRS features, and a possible reduction in hospital length of stay. This study is limited by low-quality evidence and skewing of data toward isolated hepatic injuries. Future prospective cohort study comparing NOM with and without DLPW is required.
在血流动力学稳定的患者中,钝性腹部创伤的非手术治疗(NOM)已变得越来越普遍。由于未引流的腹腔内液体积聚,NOM 存在已知的并发症,包括需要延迟手术的出血和腹膜炎。因此,延迟手术可以被视为 NOM 整体治疗计划的一部分,而不是 NOM 的失败。本范围综述的目的是确定关于钝性腹部创伤患者 NOM 后延迟腹腔镜腹膜灌洗(DLPW)的关键概念。
系统检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和灰色文献。如果研究调查或报告了钝性腹部创伤患者 NOM 后延迟腹腔镜下腹膜灌洗的使用情况,则纳入研究。纳入研究的参考文献进行了手动审查,以确定其他纳入的文章。
从 910 条引文中,有 28 项研究符合纳入标准。这包括 7 份病例报告、11 份病例系列或观察性队列研究、6 篇综述文章、2 项管理指南、1 本教科书章节和 1 项随机临床试验。报告的结果显示,中等级别的肝损伤最为常见(95.2%)。DLPW 的适应证主要是临床特征和影像学发现的变化,突出了密切观察的重要性。作者报告称,DLPW 后症状、生命体征和生物化学方面有临床改善。术前平均需要输注 4 单位的浓缩红细胞,输血需求较高。住院时间和术后并发症与先前报告的钝性腹部损伤经验一致。
在 NOM 后,DLPW 对钝性腹部创伤患者有益,可以改善症状、SIRS 特征,并可能缩短住院时间。本研究受到低质量证据和数据偏向孤立性肝损伤的限制。需要进行前瞻性队列研究,比较 NOM 加或不加 DLPW 的效果。