• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度肝损伤:创伤外科与肝脏外科协作方法的治疗结果

High-grade liver injury: outcomes with a trauma surgery-liver surgery collaborative approach.

作者信息

Ramos-Jimenez Rafael G, Deeb Andrew-Paul, Truong Evelyn I, Newhouse David, Narayanan Sowmya, Alarcon Louis, Bauza Graciela M, Brown Joshua B, Forsythe Raquel, Leeper Christine, Mohan Deepika, Neal Matthew D, Puyana Juan Carlos, Rosengart Matthew R, Schuchert Vaishali Dixit, Sperry Jason L, Watson Gregory, Zuckerbraun Brian, Marsh J Wallis, Humar Abhinav, Geller David A, Billiar Timothy R, Peitzman Andrew B, Tevar Amit D

机构信息

Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jan 16;10(1):e001611. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001611. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001611
PMID:39845994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11749442/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Operative mortality for high-grade liver injury (HGLI) remains 42% to 66%, with near-universal mortality after retrohepatic caval injury. The objective of this study was to evaluate mortality and complications of operative and nonoperative management (OM and NOM) of HGLI at our institution, characterized by a trauma surgery-liver surgery collaborative approach to trauma care.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study of adult patients (age ≥16) with HGLI (The American Association for Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades IV and V) admitted to an urban level I trauma center from January 2010 to November 2021. Data were obtained from the electronic medical record and state trauma registry. Patients were categorized by management strategy: immediate OM or planned NOM. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Our institution treated 179 patients with HGLI (78% blunt, 22% penetrating); 122 grade IV (68%) and 57 grade V (32%) injuries. All abdominal gunshot wounds and 49% of blunt injuries underwent initial OM; 51% of blunt injuries were managed initially by NOM. Procedures at the initial operation included hepatorrhaphy±packing (66.4%), nonanatomic resection (5.6%), segmentectomy (9.3%), and hepatic lobectomy (7.5%). Thirty-day mortality in the OM group was substantially lower than prior reports (23.4%). Operative mortality attributable to the liver injury was 15.7%. 19.4% of patients failed NOM with one death (1.4%).

CONCLUSION

We report an operative mortality of 23.4% for HGLI in a trauma care system characterized by a collaborative approach by trauma surgeons and liver surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

高级别肝损伤(HGLI)的手术死亡率仍为42%至66%,肝后腔静脉损伤后的死亡率几乎是100%。本研究的目的是评估在我们机构中,以创伤外科-肝脏外科协作治疗创伤的方法为特征的HGLI手术治疗和非手术治疗(OM和NOM)的死亡率及并发症。

方法

这是一项对2010年1月至2021年11月入住城市一级创伤中心的成年患者(年龄≥16岁)HGLI(美国创伤外科协会(AAST)IV级和V级)的观察性队列研究。数据来自电子病历和州创伤登记处。患者按治疗策略分类:立即手术治疗或计划非手术治疗。主要结局是30天死亡率。

结果

我们机构治疗了179例HGLI患者(78%为钝性伤,22%为穿透伤);122例IV级损伤(68%)和57例V级损伤(32%)。所有腹部枪伤和49%的钝性伤接受了初始手术治疗;51%的钝性伤最初采用非手术治疗。初次手术的术式包括肝缝合术±填塞(66.4%)、非解剖性切除术(5.6%)、肝段切除术(9.3%)和肝叶切除术(7.5%)。手术治疗组的30天死亡率远低于先前报告(23.4%)。肝损伤导致的手术死亡率为15.7%。19.4%的患者非手术治疗失败,1例死亡(1.4%)。

结论

我们报告了在一个以创伤外科医生和肝脏外科医生协作方法为特征的创伤治疗系统中,HGLI的手术死亡率为23.4%。

证据级别

III级

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9be/11749442/b422a928ef5e/tsaco-10-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9be/11749442/94a18022ed6c/tsaco-10-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9be/11749442/c533b07c1943/tsaco-10-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9be/11749442/b422a928ef5e/tsaco-10-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9be/11749442/94a18022ed6c/tsaco-10-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9be/11749442/c533b07c1943/tsaco-10-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9be/11749442/b422a928ef5e/tsaco-10-1-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
High-grade liver injury: outcomes with a trauma surgery-liver surgery collaborative approach.重度肝损伤:创伤外科与肝脏外科协作方法的治疗结果
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Jan 16;10(1):e001611. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001611. eCollection 2025.
2
Hepatic resection in the management of complex injury to the liver.肝切除术在复杂肝损伤处理中的应用
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1264-9; discussion 1269-70. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181904749.
3
Surgical management and outcome of blunt major liver injuries: experience of damage control laparotomy with perihepatic packing in one trauma centre.钝性严重肝损伤的手术治疗及结果:某创伤中心采用肝周填塞损伤控制剖腹术的经验
Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.022. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
4
Non-operative management of solid organ injuries in a middle-income country, how does it stack up?中低收入国家的实体器官损伤非手术治疗:情况如何?
Injury. 2022 Sep;53(9):2992-2997. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.036. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
5
Survival Secrets: Unmasking the Factors Predicting Failure of Non-operative Management (NOM) in Splenic Injuries.生存秘诀:揭示预测脾损伤非手术治疗(NOM)失败的因素
Cureus. 2023 Oct 19;15(10):e47332. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47332. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Blunt liver trauma: a descriptive analysis from a level I trauma center.钝性肝外伤:来自一级创伤中心的描述性分析
BMC Surg. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0369-4.
7
Non-operative management versus operative management in high-grade blunt hepatic injury.重度钝性肝损伤的非手术治疗与手术治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 24;2015(8):CD010989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010989.pub2.
8
Outcomes of Nonoperative Management of Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Injury: A Retrospective Study.穿透性腹部创伤非手术治疗的结果:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2024 Apr 19;16(4):e58599. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58599. eCollection 2024 Apr.
9
Management of liver injuries: predictors for the need of operation and damage control surgery.肝损伤的管理:手术需求及损伤控制手术的预测因素
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1373-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
10
Contemporary management and outcomes of blunt traumatic American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grades III and IV pancreatic injuries in children: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program analysis.当代儿童钝性创伤性美国外科创伤协会器官损伤分级 III 和 IV 级胰腺损伤的处理方法和结果:创伤质量改进计划分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Sep 1;97(3):365-370. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004270. Epub 2024 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative Transcatheter Arterial Embolization and Modified Hepatorrhaphy for Severe Liver Trauma: An Emerging Damage-Control Strategy.术前经导管动脉栓塞术联合改良肝缝合术治疗严重肝外伤:一种新兴的损伤控制策略
Cureus. 2025 Jun 26;17(6):e86812. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86812. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Advancing care in high-grade liver injuries: the transformative impact of multidisciplinary collaboration.推进高级别肝损伤的治疗:多学科协作的变革性影响。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Feb 6;10(1):e001744. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001744. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Adult blunt hepatic injury: A Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm.成人钝性肝损伤:西部创伤协会关键决策算法
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jan 1;96(1):123-128. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004141. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
Primary angioembolization in liver trauma: major hepatic necrosis as a severe complication of a minimally invasive treatment-a narrative review.原发性肝动脉栓塞术治疗肝外伤:微创治疗的严重并发症——肝大片坏死:病例报告。
Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1511-1519. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01372-9. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
3
Predictive factors of non-operative management failure in 494 blunt liver injuries: a multicenter retrospective study.
494 例钝性肝损伤非手术治疗失败的预测因素:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Updates Surg. 2022 Dec;74(6):1901-1913. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01367-6. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
4
Delayed laparoscopic peritoneal washout in non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma: a scoping review.延迟腹腔镜腹腔灌洗在钝性腹部创伤非手术治疗中的应用:范围综述。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Jul 2;17(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00441-z.
5
Outcomes of Highest Grade (IV and V) Liver Injuries in Blunt and Penetrating Trauma.钝性和穿透性创伤中最严重等级(IV级和V级)肝损伤的预后
Am Surg. 2022 Oct;88(10):2551-2555. doi: 10.1177/00031348221103653. Epub 2022 May 19.
6
Definitive Surgery for Liver Trauma in a Tertiary HPB Center (with video).肝胆胰中心肝脏创伤确定性手术(附视频)
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2021 Dec;116(6):678-688. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.116.6.678.
7
Hepatobiliary and pancreatic hemorrhage: Technical tools and tricks.肝胆胰出血:技术工具与技巧
Surg Open Sci. 2021 Oct 14;7:22-25. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2021.10.001. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Contemporary Management and Outcomes of Injuries to the Inferior Vena Cava: A Prospective Multicenter Trial From PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment.当代下腔静脉损伤的管理与结局:来自 PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment 的前瞻性多中心试验。
Am Surg. 2023 Apr;89(4):714-719. doi: 10.1177/00031348211038556. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
9
Intra-abdominal Inferior Vena Cava Injuries: Operative Strategies and Outcomes.腹腔下腔静脉损伤:手术策略与结果。
Am Surg. 2021 Aug;87(8):1316-1326. doi: 10.1177/0003134820973395. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
10
Optimal treatments for hepato-pancreato-biliary trauma in severely injured patients: a narrative scoping review.严重创伤患者肝胰胆创伤的最佳治疗方法:叙述性范围综述。
Can J Surg. 2020 Sep-Oct;63(5):E431-E434. doi: 10.1503/cjs.013919.