Tso Heather H, Galindo-González Leonardo, Locke Troy, Strelkov Stephen E
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada.
Present Address: Ottawa Plant Laboratory, Science Branch, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 3851 Fallowfield Road, Ottawa, ON, K2H 8P9, Canada.
Plant Methods. 2022 Jul 2;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13007-022-00923-w.
Clubroot of canola (Brassica napus), caused by the soilborne pathogen Plasmodiophora brassicae, has become a serious threat to canola production in Canada. The deployment of clubroot-resistant (CR) cultivars is the most commonly used management strategy; however, the widespread cultivation of CR canola has resulted in the emergence of new pathotypes of P. brassicae capable of overcoming resistance. Several host differential sets have been reported for pathotype identification, but such testing is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and based on phenotypic classifications. The development of rapid and objective methods that allow for efficient, cost-effective and convenient pathotyping would enable testing of a much larger number of samples in shorter times. The aim of this study was to develop two pathotyping assays, an RNase H2-dependent PCR (rhPCR) assay and a SNaPshot assay, which could quickly differentiate P. brassicae pathotypes.
Both assays clearly distinguished between pathotype clusters in a collection of 38 single-spore isolates of P. brassicae. Additional isolates pathotyped from clubbed roots and samples from blind testing also were correctly clustered. The rhPCR assay generated clearly differentiating electrophoretic bands without non-specific amplification. The SNaPshot assay was able to detect down to a 10% relative allelic proportion in a 10:90 template mixture with both single-spore isolates and field isolates when evaluated in a relative abundance test.
This study describes the development of two rapid and sensitive technologies for P. brassicae pathotyping. The high-throughput potential and accuracy of both assays makes them promising as SNP-based pathotype identification tools for clubroot diagnostics. rhPCR is a highly sensitive approach that can be optimized into a quantitative assay, while the main advantages of SNaPshot are its ability to multiplex samples and alleles in a single reaction and the detection of up to four allelic variants per target site.
油菜(甘蓝型油菜)根肿病由土壤传播病原菌芸薹根肿菌引起,已对加拿大的油菜生产构成严重威胁。部署抗根肿病(CR)品种是最常用的管理策略;然而,CR油菜的广泛种植导致了能够克服抗性的芸薹根肿菌新致病型的出现。已经报道了几种用于致病型鉴定的寄主鉴别系,但这种检测耗时、费力且基于表型分类。开发快速、客观的方法以实现高效、经济高效且便捷的致病型分型,将能够在更短时间内检测大量样本。本研究的目的是开发两种致病型分型检测方法,即核糖核酸酶H2依赖性聚合酶链反应(rhPCR)检测法和SNaPshot检测法,它们能够快速区分芸薹根肿菌致病型。
两种检测方法都能清楚地区分38个芸薹根肿菌单孢分离株集合中的致病型簇。从根肿根部鉴定出致病型的其他分离株以及盲测样本也被正确聚类。rhPCR检测法产生了清晰可区分的电泳条带,没有非特异性扩增。在相对丰度测试中评估时,SNaPshot检测法能够在10:90的模板混合物中检测到低至10%的相对等位基因比例,无论是单孢分离株还是田间分离株。
本研究描述了两种用于芸薹根肿菌致病型分型的快速、灵敏技术的开发。两种检测方法的高通量潜力和准确性使其有望成为基于单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的根肿病诊断致病型鉴定工具。rhPCR是一种高度灵敏的方法,可以优化为定量检测,而SNaPshot的主要优点是能够在单个反应中对样本和等位基因进行多重检测,并且每个靶位点最多可检测四个等位基因变体。